Rig-Assisted Snubbing: Drillpipe Pressure Control in MPD/UBD

J. Aasen, J. Svensson
{"title":"Rig-Assisted Snubbing: Drillpipe Pressure Control in MPD/UBD","authors":"J. Aasen, J. Svensson","doi":"10.1115/omae2020-18168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An important pressure control issue during live well work is the expulsion force acting on the drillpipe. Wellhead pressure multiplied by drillpipe sealing area in the blowout preventor must be overcome before entering the well. The highest snubbing force (compression) is applied when running the first joint into the well since pipe weight is at its lowest at this time. Focus of this paper is the mechanical analysis of the drillpipe as a well barrier element during live well entry. We look at normal operation (primary well barrier) and contingency (secondary well barrier). Load cases include critical unsupported buckling, helical buckling inside tubing guide, collapse and burst. In critical unsupported buckling there is no radial confinement of the pipe and the critical buckling limit is determined at the onset of lateral deflection. On the other hand, inside the tubing guide the pipe is allowed to buckle into a helix and the buckling limit is related to permanent corkscrewing of the pipe.\n Technical contributions in this paper include engineering design formulas for unsupported buckling and helical buckling. Also presented are experimental buckling results from pipe up to 3½ inch (8.9 cm) diameter. Design calculations for primary and secondary well barriers are explained and analyzed using a field case. All load calculations are based on zero neutral axial stress as stress reference datum, which produces a yield circle that is conveniently deployed for three-dimensional well tubular design. The use of the dimensionless yield circle is found to be an efficient method to assess helical buckling loading and the combined effects of pressure and axial stresses.","PeriodicalId":403225,"journal":{"name":"Volume 11: Petroleum Technology","volume":"317 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 11: Petroleum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2020-18168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important pressure control issue during live well work is the expulsion force acting on the drillpipe. Wellhead pressure multiplied by drillpipe sealing area in the blowout preventor must be overcome before entering the well. The highest snubbing force (compression) is applied when running the first joint into the well since pipe weight is at its lowest at this time. Focus of this paper is the mechanical analysis of the drillpipe as a well barrier element during live well entry. We look at normal operation (primary well barrier) and contingency (secondary well barrier). Load cases include critical unsupported buckling, helical buckling inside tubing guide, collapse and burst. In critical unsupported buckling there is no radial confinement of the pipe and the critical buckling limit is determined at the onset of lateral deflection. On the other hand, inside the tubing guide the pipe is allowed to buckle into a helix and the buckling limit is related to permanent corkscrewing of the pipe. Technical contributions in this paper include engineering design formulas for unsupported buckling and helical buckling. Also presented are experimental buckling results from pipe up to 3½ inch (8.9 cm) diameter. Design calculations for primary and secondary well barriers are explained and analyzed using a field case. All load calculations are based on zero neutral axial stress as stress reference datum, which produces a yield circle that is conveniently deployed for three-dimensional well tubular design. The use of the dimensionless yield circle is found to be an efficient method to assess helical buckling loading and the combined effects of pressure and axial stresses.
钻机辅助缓压:MPD/UBD中的钻杆压力控制
在油井工作中,一个重要的压力控制问题是作用在钻杆上的排斥力。井口压力乘以防喷器中的钻杆密封面积必须在入井前克服。由于此时管柱重量最低,因此在下入第一个接头时施加的压井力(压缩力)最大。本文的重点是钻杆作为油井进入时的井障元件的力学分析。我们考察了正常操作(一次井屏障)和意外情况(二次井屏障)。载荷情况包括临界无支撑屈曲、油管内螺旋屈曲、坍塌和爆裂。在临界无支撑屈曲中,管道没有径向约束,临界屈曲极限是在横向挠曲开始时确定的。另一方面,在油管导流器内部,允许油管屈曲成螺旋形,屈曲极限与油管的永久旋塞有关。本文的技术贡献包括无支撑屈曲和螺旋屈曲的工程设计公式。还介绍了直径达3.5英寸(8.9厘米)的管道的实验屈曲结果。通过现场实例,对一次井和二次井屏障的设计计算进行了解释和分析。所有载荷计算都基于零中性轴向应力作为应力参考基准,从而产生一个屈服圈,方便用于三维井管柱设计。利用无量纲屈服圆是评估螺旋屈曲载荷以及压力和轴向应力联合作用的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信