The Legality of Oil & Gas Production Sharing Contract Gross Split Scheme

Fakharsyah Hanif Sugiyartomo
{"title":"The Legality of Oil & Gas Production Sharing Contract Gross Split Scheme","authors":"Fakharsyah Hanif Sugiyartomo","doi":"10.33116/IJE.V2I1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an oil producing nation, Indonesia embodied its authority to manage its oil resources through article 33 paragraphs 3 of The Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. Regarding the article, this means that the state has the authority to manage Indonesian natural resources, directly or indirectly, through other public and/or private institutions and the profit of such activity shall be for the benefit of the people. This granted the state to appoint other institution, including a National/International Oil Company (NOC/IOC), to manage the exploration and production of oil, as that particular activity is regarded as a high risk and high capital business. In order to do so, according to Law no. 22 2001, the state may appoint a NOC/IOC through a production sharing contract. In this research, it is founded that the regulation that governed a production sharing contract with the gross split mechanism—Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 8 2017 jo. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources No. 52 2017—does not have a strong legal basis. In overall, the management of oil and gas through the gross split mechanism does not gives a maximum benefit for the state, and does not attract the IOC/NOC interest to explore and produce oil and gas in Indonesia. Therefore, in this paper, the reviewing of oil and gas management through a gross split mechanism is recommended. \nKeywords: management, gross split scheme, income taxes","PeriodicalId":119876,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33116/IJE.V2I1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an oil producing nation, Indonesia embodied its authority to manage its oil resources through article 33 paragraphs 3 of The Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. Regarding the article, this means that the state has the authority to manage Indonesian natural resources, directly or indirectly, through other public and/or private institutions and the profit of such activity shall be for the benefit of the people. This granted the state to appoint other institution, including a National/International Oil Company (NOC/IOC), to manage the exploration and production of oil, as that particular activity is regarded as a high risk and high capital business. In order to do so, according to Law no. 22 2001, the state may appoint a NOC/IOC through a production sharing contract. In this research, it is founded that the regulation that governed a production sharing contract with the gross split mechanism—Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 8 2017 jo. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources No. 52 2017—does not have a strong legal basis. In overall, the management of oil and gas through the gross split mechanism does not gives a maximum benefit for the state, and does not attract the IOC/NOC interest to explore and produce oil and gas in Indonesia. Therefore, in this paper, the reviewing of oil and gas management through a gross split mechanism is recommended. Keywords: management, gross split scheme, income taxes
油气产量分成合同总分割方案的合法性
作为一个石油生产国,印度尼西亚通过1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第33条第3款体现了其管理其石油资源的权力。关于该条,这意味着国家有权通过其他公共和/或私人机构直接或间接地管理印度尼西亚的自然资源,这种活动的利润应有利于人民。该法案允许国家指定其他机构,包括国家/国际石油公司(NOC/IOC),来管理石油勘探和生产,因为该活动被认为是高风险和高资本的业务。为了做到这一点,根据法律第。2001年22日,国家可以通过产量分成合同指定国家石油公司/国际奥委会。本研究发现,对生产分成合同实行总量分割机制的规定——能源矿产部2017年第8号条例。能源和矿产资源部2017年第52号文件并没有强有力的法律依据。总的来说,通过总分割机制管理石油和天然气并没有给国家带来最大的利益,也没有吸引IOC/NOC在印度尼西亚勘探和生产石油和天然气的兴趣。在此基础上,提出了利用总分裂机制进行油气管理的新思路。关键词:管理,分红方案,所得税
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信