Machine learning and statistical techniques. An application to the prediction of insolvency in spanish non-life insurance companies

Zuleyka Díaz Martínez, María Jesús Segovia Vargas, J. Hernández, Eva del Pozo
{"title":"Machine learning and statistical techniques. An application to the prediction of insolvency in spanish non-life insurance companies","authors":"Zuleyka Díaz Martínez, María Jesús Segovia Vargas, J. Hernández, Eva del Pozo","doi":"10.4192/1577-8517-V5_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prediction of insurance companies insolvency has arisen as an important problem in the field of financial research. Most methods applied in the past to tackle this issue are traditional statistical techniques which use financial ratios as explicative variables. However, these variables often do not satisfy statistical assumptions, which complicates the application of the mentioned methods. In this paper, a comparative study of the performance of two non-parametric machine learning techniques (See5 and Rough Set) is carried out. We have applied the two methods to the problem of the prediction of insolvency of Spanish non-life insurance companies, upon the basis of a set of financial ratios. We also compare these methods with three classical and well-known techniques: one of them belonging to the field of Machine Learning (Multilayer Perceptron) and two statistical ones (Linear Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression). Results indicate a higher performance of the machine learning techniques. Furthermore, See5 and Rough Set provide easily understandable and interpretable decision models, which shows that these methods can be a useful tool to evaluate insolvency of insurance firms.","PeriodicalId":404481,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-V5_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Prediction of insurance companies insolvency has arisen as an important problem in the field of financial research. Most methods applied in the past to tackle this issue are traditional statistical techniques which use financial ratios as explicative variables. However, these variables often do not satisfy statistical assumptions, which complicates the application of the mentioned methods. In this paper, a comparative study of the performance of two non-parametric machine learning techniques (See5 and Rough Set) is carried out. We have applied the two methods to the problem of the prediction of insolvency of Spanish non-life insurance companies, upon the basis of a set of financial ratios. We also compare these methods with three classical and well-known techniques: one of them belonging to the field of Machine Learning (Multilayer Perceptron) and two statistical ones (Linear Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression). Results indicate a higher performance of the machine learning techniques. Furthermore, See5 and Rough Set provide easily understandable and interpretable decision models, which shows that these methods can be a useful tool to evaluate insolvency of insurance firms.
机器学习和统计技术。西班牙非寿险公司破产预测的应用
保险公司破产预测已成为金融研究领域的一个重要问题。过去用于解决这一问题的大多数方法是使用财务比率作为解释变量的传统统计技术。然而,这些变量通常不满足统计假设,这使得上述方法的应用变得复杂。本文对两种非参数机器学习技术(See5和Rough Set)的性能进行了比较研究。我们已将这两种方法应用于西班牙非寿险公司破产预测的问题,基于一套财务比率。我们还将这些方法与三种经典的知名技术进行了比较:其中一种属于机器学习领域(多层感知器),另两种属于统计领域(线性判别分析和逻辑回归)。结果表明机器学习技术具有更高的性能。此外,See5和粗糙集提供了易于理解和解释的决策模型,这表明这些方法可以成为评估保险公司破产的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信