Artificial Well Engineering Intelligence (AweI): Is It Drilling Engineer's Dream or Driller's Nightmare?

Robello Samuel, K. Kumar
{"title":"Artificial Well Engineering Intelligence (AweI): Is It Drilling Engineer's Dream or Driller's Nightmare?","authors":"Robello Samuel, K. Kumar","doi":"10.2118/213686-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Applying artificial intelligence (AI) is exceedingly difficult for drilling operations as the system is overly complex and dynamic. As a result, more comprehensive domain-general engineering mapping, also known as \"artificial well engineering intelligence,\" is required to predict operating parameters and problems with reasonable accuracy. This paper presents a detailed overview of engineering models that are interconnected in the form of microservices to provide a more logical solution as the well is drilled. It draws out some important findings and discusses ways that results can be infused with the work on explainable artificial engineering intelligence in realtime. The results argue the logical reasoning and mathematical proof.\n Drilling Engineer–Driller–Rig system interaction through AweI with interconnected subdomains requires tighter integration between various engineering models. To some extent, tractable abstract knowledge at the human level is derived from analytical reasoning through engineering models. Various engineering models are connected in the form of microservices, which can be called any number of times when the optimization is carried out. The results are transferred for physical actions either to the driller or control as set points. The method presented does not claim to address all the issues as a whole. This methodology attempts, however, to present a coherent adaptive model that provides more transparency to the algorithms that can be used as operational parameters for the driller.\n The analysis results have shown that the convergence was very quick in obtaining an optimal solution and the predictability in the test wells has shown the best solution results under uncertainty. It has also been found that the results provide reasonable threshold values when increased data is used as the well is drilled. As long as the driller stays within the operational region, the results have shown that the operating parameters are satisfying and good enough for the desirable outcome. In other words, a near-normal engineering solution is achieved.\n The two major interacting bottlenecks observed in the study are (1) the absence of domain-expertise and mapping the conceptual space and (2) the valuation of the results, which can be translated into practical operational parameters.\n The engineering microservices to derive engineering intelligence include the following: Torsional and lateral instabilities ROP coupled bit wear Hole cleaning Casing wear BHA Drill ahead Mechanical specific energy Hydro mechanical specific energy Motor stall weight (if motor present)","PeriodicalId":249245,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213686-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Applying artificial intelligence (AI) is exceedingly difficult for drilling operations as the system is overly complex and dynamic. As a result, more comprehensive domain-general engineering mapping, also known as "artificial well engineering intelligence," is required to predict operating parameters and problems with reasonable accuracy. This paper presents a detailed overview of engineering models that are interconnected in the form of microservices to provide a more logical solution as the well is drilled. It draws out some important findings and discusses ways that results can be infused with the work on explainable artificial engineering intelligence in realtime. The results argue the logical reasoning and mathematical proof. Drilling Engineer–Driller–Rig system interaction through AweI with interconnected subdomains requires tighter integration between various engineering models. To some extent, tractable abstract knowledge at the human level is derived from analytical reasoning through engineering models. Various engineering models are connected in the form of microservices, which can be called any number of times when the optimization is carried out. The results are transferred for physical actions either to the driller or control as set points. The method presented does not claim to address all the issues as a whole. This methodology attempts, however, to present a coherent adaptive model that provides more transparency to the algorithms that can be used as operational parameters for the driller. The analysis results have shown that the convergence was very quick in obtaining an optimal solution and the predictability in the test wells has shown the best solution results under uncertainty. It has also been found that the results provide reasonable threshold values when increased data is used as the well is drilled. As long as the driller stays within the operational region, the results have shown that the operating parameters are satisfying and good enough for the desirable outcome. In other words, a near-normal engineering solution is achieved. The two major interacting bottlenecks observed in the study are (1) the absence of domain-expertise and mapping the conceptual space and (2) the valuation of the results, which can be translated into practical operational parameters. The engineering microservices to derive engineering intelligence include the following: Torsional and lateral instabilities ROP coupled bit wear Hole cleaning Casing wear BHA Drill ahead Mechanical specific energy Hydro mechanical specific energy Motor stall weight (if motor present)
人工井工程智能:是钻井工程师的梦想还是司钻的噩梦?
由于系统过于复杂和动态,在钻井作业中应用人工智能(AI)非常困难。因此,需要更全面的领域通用工程测绘,也称为“人工井工程智能”,以合理的精度预测操作参数和问题。本文详细介绍了以微服务的形式相互连接的工程模型,以便在钻井过程中提供更合乎逻辑的解决方案。它得出了一些重要的发现,并讨论了如何将结果实时注入可解释的人工工程智能的工作中。结果证明了逻辑推理和数学证明。钻井工程师-钻工-钻机系统通过AweI与相互关联的子域进行交互,要求各种工程模型之间进行更紧密的集成。在某种程度上,人类层面上可处理的抽象知识是通过工程模型的分析推理得来的。各种工程模型以微服务的形式连接在一起,在进行优化时可以调用微服务任意次数。结果作为设定值传递给司钻或控制人员,以进行物理操作。所提出的方法并不能作为一个整体解决所有问题。然而,该方法试图提供一个连贯的自适应模型,为算法提供更多的透明度,可作为司钻的操作参数。分析结果表明,该方法收敛速度快,得到最优解,测试井的可预测性在不确定条件下得到最优解。还发现,当钻井时使用增加的数据时,结果提供了合理的阈值。结果表明,只要司钻停留在作业区域内,作业参数是令人满意的,足以达到预期的效果。换句话说,实现了接近正常的工程解决方案。研究中观察到的两个主要相互作用的瓶颈是:(1)缺乏领域专业知识和映射概念空间;(2)结果的评估,这可以转化为实际的操作参数。用于获取工程智能的工程微服务包括:扭转和侧向不稳定性ROP耦合钻头磨损井眼清洗套管磨损BHA预钻机械比能水力机械比能马达失速重量(如果有马达)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信