Self-Fulfilling Fire Sales: Fragility of Collateralised Short-Term Debt Markets

J. Kuong
{"title":"Self-Fulfilling Fire Sales: Fragility of Collateralised Short-Term Debt Markets","authors":"J. Kuong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2506661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows that collateralised short-term debt, although privately optimal for reducing borrowers’ moral hazard, can cause fragility (multiple equilibria) when the collateral market is illiquid. A new form of coordination failure between borrowers’ ex ante margin and risk-taking decisions engenders a systemic run in the collateralised debt market: large changes in credit rationing, margins, repo spreads, etc. The model also captures the large (small) crosssectional differences between safe and risky collateral in bad (good) times. Finally, I show that asset price guarantees could improve welfare and promote stability but repealing repo contracts’ “automatic stay” exemption might do the opposite.","PeriodicalId":122208,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2506661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This paper shows that collateralised short-term debt, although privately optimal for reducing borrowers’ moral hazard, can cause fragility (multiple equilibria) when the collateral market is illiquid. A new form of coordination failure between borrowers’ ex ante margin and risk-taking decisions engenders a systemic run in the collateralised debt market: large changes in credit rationing, margins, repo spreads, etc. The model also captures the large (small) crosssectional differences between safe and risky collateral in bad (good) times. Finally, I show that asset price guarantees could improve welfare and promote stability but repealing repo contracts’ “automatic stay” exemption might do the opposite.
自我实现的甩卖:短期债务抵押市场的脆弱性
本文表明,尽管短期债务抵押对降低借款人的道德风险是最优的,但当抵押市场缺乏流动性时,它可能导致脆弱性(多重均衡)。借款人事前保证金与冒险决策之间的一种新形式的协调失灵,导致了债务抵押市场的系统性挤兑:信贷配给、保证金、回购价差等方面发生了巨大变化。该模型还捕捉到了安全抵押品和风险抵押品在经济低迷时期(经济繁荣时期)的大(小)横截面差异。最后,我表明,资产价格担保可以改善福利并促进稳定,但废除回购合约的“自动停留”豁免可能会适得其反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信