Optimal Portfolio Strategy to Control Maximum Drawdown - The Case of Risk Based Dynamic Asset Allocation

Z. George Yang, Liang Zhong
{"title":"Optimal Portfolio Strategy to Control Maximum Drawdown - The Case of Risk Based Dynamic Asset Allocation","authors":"Z. George Yang, Liang Zhong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2053854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a discrete quantitative trading strategy to directly control a portfolio's maximum percentage of drawdown losses while trying to maximize the portfolio's long-term growth rate. Design/methodology/approach - The loss control target is defined through a Rolling Economic Drawdown (REDD) with a constant look-back time window. The authors specify risk aversion in the power-law portfolio wealth utility function as the complement of maximum percentage loss limit and assume long-term stable Sharpe ratios for asset class indexes while updating volatility estimation in dynamic asset allocation implementation. Findings - Over a test period of the past 20 years (1992-2011), a risk-based out-of-sample dynamic asset allocation among three broad based indexes (equity, fixed income and commodities) and a risk free asset, is robust against variations in capital market expectation inputs, and out-performs the in-the-sample calibrated model and traditional asset allocation significantly. Research limitations/implications - The current proposal can lead to a new mathematical framework for portfolio selection. Besides investors' liquidity and behavioural constraints, macroeconomic and market cycle, and the potential of central bank interventions following a market crash, could be additionally considered for a more rigorous dynamic asset allocation model. Practical implications - Besides the benefit of a clear mandate to construct suitable client portfolios, the portfolio approach can be applied to design invest-able securities, such as principal-guaranteed investment products, target risk asset allocation ETFs, and target-date mutual funds with a glide path, etc. The formulation can also be implemented as a managed futures hedge fund portfolio. Originality/value - The paper introduces the Rolling Economic Drawdown (REDD) concept and specifies risk aversion as the floor of maximum percentage loss tolerance. Dynamic asset allocation is implemented through updating estimation of asset class volatilities.","PeriodicalId":242545,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Econometric Studies of Capital Markets (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Econometric Studies of Capital Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2053854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a discrete quantitative trading strategy to directly control a portfolio's maximum percentage of drawdown losses while trying to maximize the portfolio's long-term growth rate. Design/methodology/approach - The loss control target is defined through a Rolling Economic Drawdown (REDD) with a constant look-back time window. The authors specify risk aversion in the power-law portfolio wealth utility function as the complement of maximum percentage loss limit and assume long-term stable Sharpe ratios for asset class indexes while updating volatility estimation in dynamic asset allocation implementation. Findings - Over a test period of the past 20 years (1992-2011), a risk-based out-of-sample dynamic asset allocation among three broad based indexes (equity, fixed income and commodities) and a risk free asset, is robust against variations in capital market expectation inputs, and out-performs the in-the-sample calibrated model and traditional asset allocation significantly. Research limitations/implications - The current proposal can lead to a new mathematical framework for portfolio selection. Besides investors' liquidity and behavioural constraints, macroeconomic and market cycle, and the potential of central bank interventions following a market crash, could be additionally considered for a more rigorous dynamic asset allocation model. Practical implications - Besides the benefit of a clear mandate to construct suitable client portfolios, the portfolio approach can be applied to design invest-able securities, such as principal-guaranteed investment products, target risk asset allocation ETFs, and target-date mutual funds with a glide path, etc. The formulation can also be implemented as a managed futures hedge fund portfolio. Originality/value - The paper introduces the Rolling Economic Drawdown (REDD) concept and specifies risk aversion as the floor of maximum percentage loss tolerance. Dynamic asset allocation is implemented through updating estimation of asset class volatilities.
控制最大回撤的最优投资组合策略——基于风险的动态资产配置案例
目的-本文的目的是提出一种离散的量化交易策略,以直接控制投资组合的最大回吐损失百分比,同时试图最大化投资组合的长期增长率。设计/方法论/方法-通过滚动经济递减(REDD)定义损失控制目标,并具有恒定的回顾时间窗口。将幂律组合财富效用函数中的风险厌恶作为最大百分比损失限制的补充,并假设资产类别指数的夏普比率长期稳定,同时更新了动态资产配置实施中的波动率估计。在过去20年的测试期间(1992-2011),基于风险的样本外动态资产配置在三个广泛基础指数(股票,固定收益和商品)和无风险资产之间,对资本市场预期输入的变化具有稳健性,并且显着优于样本内校准模型和传统资产配置。研究限制/启示-当前的建议可以导致一个新的数学框架的投资组合选择。除了投资者的流动性和行为约束之外,宏观经济和市场周期以及市场崩溃后央行干预的潜力,可以额外考虑更严格的动态资产配置模型。实际意义-除了构建合适的客户投资组合的明确任务之外,投资组合方法还可以应用于设计可投资证券,例如本金保证投资产品,目标风险资产配置etf和目标日期滑动路径共同基金等。该公式也可以作为管理期货对冲基金组合来实施。原创性/价值——本文引入了滚动经济递减(REDD)概念,并将风险厌恶作为最大损失容忍百分比的下限。通过对资产类别波动率的更新估计实现动态资产配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信