The Influence of Communication and Cosmopoliteness on Quality of Life Perceptions

Leo W. Jeffres, K. Neuendorf, C. Bracken, D. Atkin
{"title":"The Influence of Communication and Cosmopoliteness on Quality of Life Perceptions","authors":"Leo W. Jeffres, K. Neuendorf, C. Bracken, D. Atkin","doi":"10.2174/1874916X00802010017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the impact of a sequence of variables that includes people's communication activity and quality of life assessments. Survey results indicate that more cosmopolitan people, those with more diverse interests, those with stronger patterns of media use, and those with higher levels of community knowledge hold stronger assessments of the quality of life available in their community. No such relationships are found for people's assessment of whether the country is headed in the right direction. The growing body of quality of life research often ig- nores the work conducted by communication researchers (see Andrews, 1986; Campbell, 1981; Sirgy, 2001; Sirgy & Samli, 1995). People's subjective assessments of their qual- ity of life may be affected not only by the objective envi- ronment (Andrews & Withey, 1976 (1974 in Refs.); Headley et al., 1991) but also by their personal assessments based on information gained through media and interpersonal chan- nels. This process involves a comparative element, as people make judgments based not only on their own experiences and circumstances but also on messages about their situation and how things are going elsewhere (Campbell et al., 1976). Inglehart and Rabier (1986), Michalos (1986), and others propose an aspiration-adjustment model where the perceived quality of life reflects a gap between aspirations and one's perceived situation. Although aspirations may be internally derived, we also conclude what's possible--or what's desir- able--by learning about the quality of life elsewhere. Thus, quality of life assessments are affected by personal experi- ences, aspirations and hopes that reflect our assessment of what's achievable elsewhere, and messages that tell us about our own immediate environment. i","PeriodicalId":297766,"journal":{"name":"The Open Communication Journal","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874916X00802010017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article examines the impact of a sequence of variables that includes people's communication activity and quality of life assessments. Survey results indicate that more cosmopolitan people, those with more diverse interests, those with stronger patterns of media use, and those with higher levels of community knowledge hold stronger assessments of the quality of life available in their community. No such relationships are found for people's assessment of whether the country is headed in the right direction. The growing body of quality of life research often ig- nores the work conducted by communication researchers (see Andrews, 1986; Campbell, 1981; Sirgy, 2001; Sirgy & Samli, 1995). People's subjective assessments of their qual- ity of life may be affected not only by the objective envi- ronment (Andrews & Withey, 1976 (1974 in Refs.); Headley et al., 1991) but also by their personal assessments based on information gained through media and interpersonal chan- nels. This process involves a comparative element, as people make judgments based not only on their own experiences and circumstances but also on messages about their situation and how things are going elsewhere (Campbell et al., 1976). Inglehart and Rabier (1986), Michalos (1986), and others propose an aspiration-adjustment model where the perceived quality of life reflects a gap between aspirations and one's perceived situation. Although aspirations may be internally derived, we also conclude what's possible--or what's desir- able--by learning about the quality of life elsewhere. Thus, quality of life assessments are affected by personal experi- ences, aspirations and hopes that reflect our assessment of what's achievable elsewhere, and messages that tell us about our own immediate environment. i
交流和世界性对生活质量感知的影响
本文考察了一系列变量的影响,包括人们的交流活动和生活质量评估。调查结果表明,更国际化的人、兴趣更多样化的人、媒体使用模式更强的人以及社区知识水平更高的人对其社区的生活质量有更强的评价。在人们对国家是否朝着正确方向前进的评估中,没有发现这种关系。越来越多的生活质量研究往往忽视了传播研究人员所做的工作(见Andrews, 1986;坎贝尔,1981;Sirgy, 2001;Sirgy & Samli, 1995)。人们对生活质量的主观评价可能不仅受到客观环境的影响(Andrews & Withey, 1976 (1974 in Refs.);Headley et al., 1991),但也依赖于他们基于通过媒体和人际渠道获得的信息的个人评估。这个过程涉及比较因素,因为人们不仅根据自己的经验和环境,而且根据有关自己的情况和其他地方的情况的信息做出判断(Campbell et al., 1976)。Inglehart和Rabier (1986), Michalos(1986)等人提出了一个期望-调整模型,其中感知到的生活质量反映了期望和感知到的情况之间的差距。虽然抱负可能来自内部,但通过了解其他地方的生活质量,我们也能得出什么是可能的——或者什么是可取的。因此,生活质量评估受到个人经历、抱负和希望的影响,这些影响反映了我们对其他地方可以实现的评估,以及告诉我们自己当前环境的信息。我
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信