Measuring the Ideology of Audiences for Web Links and Domains Using Differentially Private Engagement Data

C. Buntain, Richard Bonneau, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker
{"title":"Measuring the Ideology of Audiences for Web Links and Domains Using Differentially Private Engagement Data","authors":"C. Buntain, Richard Bonneau, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker","doi":"10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper demonstrates the use of differentially private hyperlink-level engagement data for measuring ideologies of audiences for web domains, individual links, or aggregations thereof.\nWe examine a simple metric for measuring this ideological position and assess the conditions under which the metric is robust to injected, privacy-preserving noise.\nThis assessment provides insights into and constraints on the level of activity one should observe when applying this metric to privacy-protected data.\nGrounding this work is a massive dataset of social media engagement activity where privacy-preserving noise has been injected into the activity data, provided by Facebook and the Social Science One (SS1) consortium.\nUsing this dataset, we validate our ideology measures by comparing to similar, published work on sharing-based, homophily- and content-oriented measures, where we show consistently high correlation (>0.87).\nWe then apply this metric to individual links from several popular news domains and demonstrate how one can assess link-level distributions of ideological audiences.\nWe further show this estimator is robust to selection of engagement types besides sharing, where domain-level audience-ideology assessments based on views and likes show no significant difference compared to sharing-based estimates.\nEstimates of partisanship, however, suggest the viewing audience is more moderate than the audiences who share and like these domains.\nBeyond providing thresholds on sufficient activity for measuring audience ideology and comparing three types of engagement, this analysis provides a blueprint for ensuring robustness of future work to differential privacy protections.","PeriodicalId":175641,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Web and Social Media","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Web and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the use of differentially private hyperlink-level engagement data for measuring ideologies of audiences for web domains, individual links, or aggregations thereof. We examine a simple metric for measuring this ideological position and assess the conditions under which the metric is robust to injected, privacy-preserving noise. This assessment provides insights into and constraints on the level of activity one should observe when applying this metric to privacy-protected data. Grounding this work is a massive dataset of social media engagement activity where privacy-preserving noise has been injected into the activity data, provided by Facebook and the Social Science One (SS1) consortium. Using this dataset, we validate our ideology measures by comparing to similar, published work on sharing-based, homophily- and content-oriented measures, where we show consistently high correlation (>0.87). We then apply this metric to individual links from several popular news domains and demonstrate how one can assess link-level distributions of ideological audiences. We further show this estimator is robust to selection of engagement types besides sharing, where domain-level audience-ideology assessments based on views and likes show no significant difference compared to sharing-based estimates. Estimates of partisanship, however, suggest the viewing audience is more moderate than the audiences who share and like these domains. Beyond providing thresholds on sufficient activity for measuring audience ideology and comparing three types of engagement, this analysis provides a blueprint for ensuring robustness of future work to differential privacy protections.
使用不同的私人参与数据测量网络链接和领域的受众意识形态
本文演示了使用不同的私有超链接级参与数据来测量网络域、单个链接或聚合的受众意识形态。我们研究了一个简单的度量来衡量这种意识形态的立场,并评估了该度量对注入的保护隐私的噪声具有鲁棒性的条件。此评估提供了在将此度量应用于受隐私保护的数据时应该观察的活动级别的见解和约束。这项工作的基础是一个庞大的社交媒体参与活动数据集,其中隐私保护噪声被注入到活动数据中,由Facebook和社会科学一号(SS1)财团提供。使用该数据集,我们通过比较基于共享的、同质性的和面向内容的类似的已发表的测量来验证我们的意识形态测量,在这些测量中我们显示出一致的高相关性(>0.87)。然后,我们将这一指标应用于来自几个流行新闻领域的单个链接,并演示如何评估意识形态受众的链接级分布。我们进一步表明,除了分享之外,该估计器对参与类型的选择具有鲁棒性,其中基于观点和喜欢的领域级受众意识形态评估与基于分享的估计相比没有显着差异。然而,对党派偏见的估计表明,观看这些域名的观众比分享和喜欢这些域名的观众更温和。除了为衡量受众意识形态和比较三种类型的参与提供足够的活动阈值之外,该分析还为确保未来工作对不同隐私保护的稳健性提供了蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信