Influence of ILA and RTM on the Achievement of Students on the Topic: Cells and Simple Circuits

Samuel Inzahuli
{"title":"Influence of ILA and RTM on the Achievement of Students on the Topic: Cells and Simple Circuits","authors":"Samuel Inzahuli","doi":"10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i9/hs2108-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The main purpose of this study was to compare the achievement of students in Physics when Integrated Learning Approach (ILA) and Regular Teaching Methods (RTM) are used on the topic: cells and simple circuits. The study was quantitative, utilizing quasi experimental design of pre- test, post- test, and non-equivalent groups. A sample of 395 respondents from ten secondary schools was selected using multi stage and simple random sampling techniques. Two Physics Assessment Tests (PAT) were used to gauge students’ achievement in Physics: PAT 1 and PAT 2. The validity of the items, by three Physics- subject experts, was classified as good. The reliability coefficients of 0.803 and 0.791 were obtained for PAT1 and PAT2 respectively. Data analysis utilized t- test and ANOVA. The results obtained show there was significant difference between ILA and RTM. The results of the study showed that ILA enhanced higher academic achievement in Physics compared to RTM.","PeriodicalId":443596,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i9/hs2108-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The main purpose of this study was to compare the achievement of students in Physics when Integrated Learning Approach (ILA) and Regular Teaching Methods (RTM) are used on the topic: cells and simple circuits. The study was quantitative, utilizing quasi experimental design of pre- test, post- test, and non-equivalent groups. A sample of 395 respondents from ten secondary schools was selected using multi stage and simple random sampling techniques. Two Physics Assessment Tests (PAT) were used to gauge students’ achievement in Physics: PAT 1 and PAT 2. The validity of the items, by three Physics- subject experts, was classified as good. The reliability coefficients of 0.803 and 0.791 were obtained for PAT1 and PAT2 respectively. Data analysis utilized t- test and ANOVA. The results obtained show there was significant difference between ILA and RTM. The results of the study showed that ILA enhanced higher academic achievement in Physics compared to RTM.
ILA和RTM对学生“细胞与简单电路”题目成绩的影响
本研究的主要目的是比较学生在“细胞与简单电路”这一主题上使用整合学习方法(ILA)和常规教学方法(RTM)的成绩。本研究为定量研究,采用准实验设计,分为前测组、后测组和非等效组。采用多阶段和简单随机抽样的方法,选取了来自10所中学的395名受访者。两种物理评估测试(PAT)被用来衡量学生的物理成绩:PAT 1和PAT 2。三名物理学科专家将试题的效度评定为“良好”。PAT1和PAT2的信度系数分别为0.803和0.791。数据分析采用t检验和方差分析。结果表明,ILA与RTM有显著性差异。研究结果表明,与RTM相比,ILA提高了物理方面的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信