Characterization and analysis of HMMER and SVM-RFE parallel bioinformatics applications

U. Srinivasan, Peng-Sheng Chen, Q. Diao, C. Lim, E. Li, Yongjian Chen, R. Ju, Yimin Zhang
{"title":"Characterization and analysis of HMMER and SVM-RFE parallel bioinformatics applications","authors":"U. Srinivasan, Peng-Sheng Chen, Q. Diao, C. Lim, E. Li, Yongjian Chen, R. Ju, Yimin Zhang","doi":"10.1109/IISWC.2005.1526004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bioinformatics applications constitute an emerging data-intensive, high-performance computing (HPC) domain. While there is much research on algorithmic improvements, (2004), the actual performance of an application also depends on how well the program maps to the target hardware. This paper presents a performance study of two parallel bioinformatics applications HMMER (sequence alignment) and SVM-RFE (gene expression analysis), on Intel x86 based hyperthread-capable (2002) shared-memory multiprocessor systems. The performance characteristics varied according to the application and target hardware characteristics. For instance, HMMER is compute intensive and showed better scalability on a 3.0 GHz system versus a 2.2 GHz system. However, SVM-RFE is memory intensive and showed better absolute performance on the 2.2 GHz machine which has better memory bandwidth. The performance is also impacted by processor features, e.g. hyperthreading (HT) (2002) and prefetching. With HMMER we could obtain -75% of the performance with HT enabled with respect to doubling the number of CPUs. While load balancing optimizations can provide speedup of -30% for HMMER on a hyperthreading-enabled system, the load balancing has to adapt to the target number of processors and threads. SVM-RFE benefits differently from the same load-balancing and thread scheduling tuning. We conclude that compiler and runtime optimizations play an important role to achieve the best performance for a given bioinformatics algorithm.","PeriodicalId":275514,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International. 2005 Proceedings of the IEEE Workload Characterization Symposium, 2005.","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International. 2005 Proceedings of the IEEE Workload Characterization Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISWC.2005.1526004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Bioinformatics applications constitute an emerging data-intensive, high-performance computing (HPC) domain. While there is much research on algorithmic improvements, (2004), the actual performance of an application also depends on how well the program maps to the target hardware. This paper presents a performance study of two parallel bioinformatics applications HMMER (sequence alignment) and SVM-RFE (gene expression analysis), on Intel x86 based hyperthread-capable (2002) shared-memory multiprocessor systems. The performance characteristics varied according to the application and target hardware characteristics. For instance, HMMER is compute intensive and showed better scalability on a 3.0 GHz system versus a 2.2 GHz system. However, SVM-RFE is memory intensive and showed better absolute performance on the 2.2 GHz machine which has better memory bandwidth. The performance is also impacted by processor features, e.g. hyperthreading (HT) (2002) and prefetching. With HMMER we could obtain -75% of the performance with HT enabled with respect to doubling the number of CPUs. While load balancing optimizations can provide speedup of -30% for HMMER on a hyperthreading-enabled system, the load balancing has to adapt to the target number of processors and threads. SVM-RFE benefits differently from the same load-balancing and thread scheduling tuning. We conclude that compiler and runtime optimizations play an important role to achieve the best performance for a given bioinformatics algorithm.
HMMER与SVM-RFE并行生物信息学应用的表征与分析
生物信息学应用构成了一个新兴的数据密集型、高性能计算(HPC)领域。虽然有很多关于算法改进的研究(2004),但应用程序的实际性能还取决于程序与目标硬件的映射程度。本文介绍了两个并行生物信息学应用HMMER(序列比对)和SVM-RFE(基因表达分析)在Intel x86超线程(2002)共享内存多处理器系统上的性能研究。性能特征根据应用程序和目标硬件特征而变化。例如,HMMER是计算密集型的,在3.0 GHz系统上比在2.2 GHz系统上表现出更好的可伸缩性。然而,SVM-RFE是内存密集型的,在具有更好内存带宽的2.2 GHz机器上表现出更好的绝对性能。性能也受到处理器特性的影响,例如超线程(HT)(2002)和预取。对于HMMER,我们可以在启用HT的情况下获得-75%的性能,并且cpu数量增加一倍。虽然负载平衡优化可以在启用超线程的系统上为HMMER提供-30%的加速,但负载平衡必须适应处理器和线程的目标数量。SVM-RFE从相同的负载平衡和线程调度调优中获得的好处不同。我们得出结论,编译器和运行时优化在实现给定生物信息学算法的最佳性能方面起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信