Going in the "Right" Direction? Promotion of Democracy in Rwanda Since 1990

R. Hayman
{"title":"Going in the \"Right\" Direction? Promotion of Democracy in Rwanda Since 1990","authors":"R. Hayman","doi":"10.29654/TJD.200907.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using diplomacy, military intervention, and aid, external actors have played an important role in brokering peace and fostering democracy in Rwanda since 1990. Rwanda is now stable and at peace, with democratic institutions in place. However, concerns about ethnicity and security underpin a democratic system based on consensus, not competition. External intervention has had both positive and negative impacts, leaving donors with limited bargaining power. Governance is important within donor programs, but activities of promoting democracy are limited. Donors appear to accept the general direction in which Rwanda is going with regard to democracy, yet it is questionable that the endpoint is a liberal democracy along Western lines.","PeriodicalId":403398,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan journal of democracy","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan journal of democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29654/TJD.200907.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Using diplomacy, military intervention, and aid, external actors have played an important role in brokering peace and fostering democracy in Rwanda since 1990. Rwanda is now stable and at peace, with democratic institutions in place. However, concerns about ethnicity and security underpin a democratic system based on consensus, not competition. External intervention has had both positive and negative impacts, leaving donors with limited bargaining power. Governance is important within donor programs, but activities of promoting democracy are limited. Donors appear to accept the general direction in which Rwanda is going with regard to democracy, yet it is questionable that the endpoint is a liberal democracy along Western lines.
走在“正确”的方向上?自1990年以来在卢旺达促进民主
自1990年以来,通过外交、军事干预和援助,外部行动者在促成和平和促进卢旺达民主方面发挥了重要作用。卢旺达现在是稳定和和平的,民主机构已经到位。然而,对种族和安全的关切是建立在共识而不是竞争基础上的民主制度的基础。外部干预既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响,使捐助者的议价能力有限。治理在捐赠项目中很重要,但促进民主的活动有限。捐助者似乎接受卢旺达在民主方面的总体方向,但终点是否会是西方路线上的自由民主,这一点值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信