Protection of Well-Known Trademarks in Malaysia: Compliant with Paris Convention, TRIPS and TPP?

Pankhuri Agarwal
{"title":"Protection of Well-Known Trademarks in Malaysia: Compliant with Paris Convention, TRIPS and TPP?","authors":"Pankhuri Agarwal","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3704696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (“TPP”) was concluded in New Zealand on February 3, 2016 by twelve countries, namely, Australia, Brunei, Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States of America and Vietnam. The TPP chapter on intellectual property, among other things, required the parties to provide protection for well-known trademarks. In wake of this there's a need to examine if the current protection for well-known trademarks in Malaysia is consistent with that mandated by TPP. Part II of this paper discusses the rationale behind providing special protection to trademarks that are well-known. Part III sets forth the standard of protection mandated by Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (“Paris Convention”) and the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (“TRIPS”) and then examine if Malaysia’s law on well-known marks in Malaysia fully complies with this standard and suggest amendments required if any. Part IV describes the level of protection required by TPP, examines if the current protection that Malaysia provides is consistent with these requirements and suggests changes in the law to resolve inconsistencies if any. In the process of assessing Malaysia’s compliance with these international conventions with respect to the protection of well-known marks, the law of other countries like Singapore and U.K. have been looked into. Also, the recommendations have been made keeping in mind the consideration that other traders in Malaysia are not unduly disadvantaged.","PeriodicalId":362846,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic)","volume":"144 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3704696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (“TPP”) was concluded in New Zealand on February 3, 2016 by twelve countries, namely, Australia, Brunei, Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States of America and Vietnam. The TPP chapter on intellectual property, among other things, required the parties to provide protection for well-known trademarks. In wake of this there's a need to examine if the current protection for well-known trademarks in Malaysia is consistent with that mandated by TPP. Part II of this paper discusses the rationale behind providing special protection to trademarks that are well-known. Part III sets forth the standard of protection mandated by Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (“Paris Convention”) and the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (“TRIPS”) and then examine if Malaysia’s law on well-known marks in Malaysia fully complies with this standard and suggest amendments required if any. Part IV describes the level of protection required by TPP, examines if the current protection that Malaysia provides is consistent with these requirements and suggests changes in the law to resolve inconsistencies if any. In the process of assessing Malaysia’s compliance with these international conventions with respect to the protection of well-known marks, the law of other countries like Singapore and U.K. have been looked into. Also, the recommendations have been made keeping in mind the consideration that other traders in Malaysia are not unduly disadvantaged.
马来西亚驰名商标的保护:是否符合巴黎公约、TRIPS和TPP?
《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(TPP)于2016年2月3日在新西兰由12个国家签署,即澳大利亚、文莱、达鲁萨兰国、加拿大、智利、日本、马来西亚、墨西哥、新西兰、秘鲁、新加坡、美国和越南。除其他事项外,TPP关于知识产权的章节要求各缔约方对驰名商标提供保护。在此之后,有必要审查马来西亚目前对驰名商标的保护是否与TPP规定的一致。本文第二部分论述了对驰名商标提供特殊保护的基本原理。第三部分阐述了《保护工业产权巴黎公约》(“巴黎公约”)和《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(“TRIPS”)规定的保护标准,然后审查马来西亚关于驰名商标的法律是否完全符合这一标准,并提出必要的修改意见。第四部分描述了TPP所要求的保护水平,检查马来西亚目前提供的保护是否与这些要求一致,并建议修改法律以解决任何不一致之处。在评估马来西亚在保护驰名商标方面是否遵守这些国际公约的过程中,我们还研究了新加坡和英国等其他国家的法律。此外,这些建议是在考虑到马来西亚的其他贸易商并不处于不利地位的情况下提出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信