Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Putusan Verstek pada Perkara Perceraian Nomor 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk

Amsir Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.36746/alj.v4i2.190

Baharudin Baharudin, I. Satria, M. A. Gumilang AS

{"title":"Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Putusan Verstek pada Perkara Perceraian Nomor 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk","authors":"Baharudin Baharudin, I. Satria, M. A. Gumilang AS","doi":"10.36746/alj.v4i2.190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verdict verstek is a decision handed down by a panel of judges without the presence of the Defendant, and his absence is without a valid reason even though he has been summoned officially and properly. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The purpose of this study is to find out the judge’s consideration of the verstek decision in divorce cases in Decision Number 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk and what reasons made the trial judge in Decision Number 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk decides on divorce cases verstek. The results of the judicial review of the judge’s consideration of the verstek decision in the divorce case in Decision Number 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk is the verstek decision in a contested divorce case. Legal considerations from judges in deciding verstek are contained in Article 149 paragraph 1 Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg). In the absence of the defendant to fulfill the summons without a valid reason, in by Article 125 paragraph 1 and Article 126, the judge can decide verstek. This verstek issue cannot be separated from the provisions of Article 12 Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Article 77 Reglement op de Rechtsvordering (Rv) and Article 125 Paragraph 1 HIR, Article 73 Rv and the verstek decision stipulated in Article 125 Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 HIR. The causes of the court judge deciding the verstek divorce case in Decision Number 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk found causal factors, namely that the defendant never attended court even though he had been summoned properly and officially based on the provisions of the applicable laws. As long as the Defendant is not present and is not caused by a reason justified by law—while the Plaintiff’s lawsuit is not against the law—then based on the provisions of Article 149 R.Bg, the Plaintiff’s lawsuit can be granted verstek. \n___ \nReferensi \nBuku dengan penulis: \nFauzan, M. (2005). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syari’ah di Indonesi. Jakarta: Kencana. \nManan, Abdul., dan Fauzan, M. (2002). Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada. \nMukarom, R. (2019). Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Alasan Perceraian pada Putusan Verstek Cerai Gugat Tahun 2017: Studi 12 Putusan di Pengadilan Agama Sumedang. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. \nRasyid, A. Roihan. (2006). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada. \nSoekanto, Soerjono. (1942). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. \nSoemitro, R. H. (1980). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. \nArtikel jurnal: \nAzizah, L. (2012). Analisis Perceraian dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Al-‘Adalah, 10(2), 415-422. \nBasir, A. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga (Derden Verzet) terhadap Putusan Verstek Sengketa Hak Milik Atas Tanah. Pledoi Law Jurnal, 1(1), 1-9. \nDarmawati, D., dan Zainuddin, A. (2015). Penerapan Keputusan Verstek di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Mizan (e-Journal), 11(1), 90-101. \nMafruh, M. H., Fasa, M. I., dan Ja’far, A. K. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 4(2), 542-556. \nMaswandi, S. H. (2017). Putusan Verstek dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Mercatoria, 10(2), 160-179. \nNurdin, M. (2018). Kajian Yuridis Penetapan Sanksi Di Bawah Sanksi Minimum Dalam Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(2), 270-285. \nPrasetya, U. (2020). Analisis Asas Audi Et Alteram Partem dalam Proses Persidangan Perkara Perdata (Perkara Nomor 20/Pdt. G/2019/PN Pwr). Amnesti Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 57-75. \nSitorus, S. (2018). Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali dan Derden Verzet). Hikmah, 15(1), 63-71. \nTompo, J., Nurhalifah, N., dan Arsyad, Y. M. (2022). Putusan Verstek terhadap Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Sungguminasa Kelas 1 B. Al-Tafaqquh: Journal of Islamic Law, 3(2), 98-107.","PeriodicalId":202883,"journal":{"name":"Amsir Law Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amsir Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v4i2.190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Verdict verstek is a decision handed down by a panel of judges without the presence of the Defendant, and his absence is without a valid reason even though he has been summoned officially and properly. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The purpose of this study is to find out the judge’s consideration of the verstek decision in divorce cases in Decision Number 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk and what reasons made the trial judge in Decision Number 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk decides on divorce cases verstek. The results of the judicial review of the judge’s consideration of the verstek decision in the divorce case in Decision Number 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk is the verstek decision in a contested divorce case. Legal considerations from judges in deciding verstek are contained in Article 149 paragraph 1 Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg). In the absence of the defendant to fulfill the summons without a valid reason, in by Article 125 paragraph 1 and Article 126, the judge can decide verstek. This verstek issue cannot be separated from the provisions of Article 12 Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Article 77 Reglement op de Rechtsvordering (Rv) and Article 125 Paragraph 1 HIR, Article 73 Rv and the verstek decision stipulated in Article 125 Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 HIR. The causes of the court judge deciding the verstek divorce case in Decision Number 1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tnk found causal factors, namely that the defendant never attended court even though he had been summoned properly and officially based on the provisions of the applicable laws. As long as the Defendant is not present and is not caused by a reason justified by law—while the Plaintiff’s lawsuit is not against the law—then based on the provisions of Article 149 R.Bg, the Plaintiff’s lawsuit can be granted verstek. ___ Referensi Buku dengan penulis: Fauzan, M. (2005). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syari’ah di Indonesi. Jakarta: Kencana. Manan, Abdul., dan Fauzan, M. (2002). Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada. Mukarom, R. (2019). Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Alasan Perceraian pada Putusan Verstek Cerai Gugat Tahun 2017: Studi 12 Putusan di Pengadilan Agama Sumedang. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. Rasyid, A. Roihan. (2006). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada. Soekanto, Soerjono. (1942). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Soemitro, R. H. (1980). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Artikel jurnal: Azizah, L. (2012). Analisis Perceraian dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Al-‘Adalah, 10(2), 415-422. Basir, A. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga (Derden Verzet) terhadap Putusan Verstek Sengketa Hak Milik Atas Tanah. Pledoi Law Jurnal, 1(1), 1-9. Darmawati, D., dan Zainuddin, A. (2015). Penerapan Keputusan Verstek di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Mizan (e-Journal), 11(1), 90-101. Mafruh, M. H., Fasa, M. I., dan Ja’far, A. K. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 4(2), 542-556. Maswandi, S. H. (2017). Putusan Verstek dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Mercatoria, 10(2), 160-179. Nurdin, M. (2018). Kajian Yuridis Penetapan Sanksi Di Bawah Sanksi Minimum Dalam Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(2), 270-285. Prasetya, U. (2020). Analisis Asas Audi Et Alteram Partem dalam Proses Persidangan Perkara Perdata (Perkara Nomor 20/Pdt. G/2019/PN Pwr). Amnesti Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 57-75. Sitorus, S. (2018). Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali dan Derden Verzet). Hikmah, 15(1), 63-71. Tompo, J., Nurhalifah, N., dan Arsyad, Y. M. (2022). Putusan Verstek terhadap Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Sungguminasa Kelas 1 B. Al-Tafaqquh: Journal of Islamic Law, 3(2), 98-107.

查看原文本刊更多论文

法官考虑的是1916年/Pdt G/2022/ pnks离婚案件的判决

verstek判决是由一组法官在被告不在场的情况下作出的决定，即使他被正式和适当地传唤，他的缺席也是没有正当理由的。本研究采用规范性的法律研究方法和成文法研究方法。本研究的目的是了解法官对第1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA号判决书中离婚案件中verstek判决的考虑。在第1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA号决定中，是什么原因使得初审法官。Tnk裁决离婚案件。第1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA号判决书中法官对离婚案中verstek判决的司法审查结果。Tnk是一宗有争议的离婚案中最公正的裁决。法官在决定是否适用法律时的法律考虑载于第149条第1款。被告无正当理由不履行传唤的，依照本法第一百二十五条第一款和第一百二十六条的规定，法官可以裁定无罪。本法本法第12条、第77条、第一百二十五条第一项、第73条之规定，以及本法第一百二十五条第一项、第二项、第三项、第四项之规定，不得与本法第12条之规定分开。法院法官在第1916/Pdt.G/2022/PA号判决书中判决verstek离婚案的原因。Tnk发现了因果因素，即被告从未出庭，即使他已根据适用法律的规定被适当和正式传唤。只要被告不在场，且不是由法律证明的理由引起的，而原告的诉讼并不违法，那么根据第149条r.g g的规定，原告的诉讼可以被准予合法。[参考文献][j] .北京大学学报:自然科学版。Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syari 'ah di indonesia。雅加达:Kencana。Manan,阿卜杜勒。， dan Fauzan, M.(2002)。Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Peradilan Agama。雅加达:Rajagrafindo Persada。Mukarom, R.(2019)。Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Alasan Pertimbangan paada Putusan Verstek Cerai Gugat Tahun 2017:研究12 Putusan di Pengadilan Agama Sumedang。万隆:un Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung。A.罗汉。(2006)。Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama。雅加达:Rajagrafindo Persada。Soekanto Soerjono。(1942)。penantar Penelitian Hukum。雅加达:印度尼西亚大学。索米特罗，r.h.(1980)。[方法学]Penelitian Hukum和Jurimetri。雅加达:印度尼西亚加利亚。学术期刊:Azizah, L.(2012)。分析Perceraian dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam。农业科学，10(2)，415-422。Basir, A.(2023)。分析Yuridis Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga (Derden Verzet)或Putusan Verstek senketa Hak Milik Atas Tanah。法律学刊，1(1)，1-9。Darmawati, D, dan Zainuddin, A.(2015)。penerapapan Keputusan Verstek di Pengadilan Agama。电子学报，11(1)，90-101。马夫鲁，M. H，法萨，M. I，丹·贾法尔，A. K.(2022)。penelesan senketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama pada Masa Covid-19大流行。Al-Kharaj: journal economic, Keuangan & Bisnis ysariah, 4(2)， 542-556。Maswandi, s.h.(2017)。Putusan Verstek dalam Hukum Acara Perdata。医学学报，10(2)，160-179。努尔丁，M.(2018)。Kajian Yuridis Penetapan Sanksi Di Bawah Sanksi Minimum Dalam Penyalahgunaan Narkotika。科学通报，2013(2)，27 - 34。Prasetya, U.(2020)。分析和分析，以及奥迪Et Alteram Partem dalam Proses Persidangan Perkara Perdata (Perkara Nomor 20/Pdt)。G / 2019 / PN压水式反应堆)。国际医学杂志，2(2)，57-75。西托鲁斯，S.(2018)。Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali dan Derden Verzet)。Hikmah, 15(1)， 63-71。Tompo, J.， Nurhalifah, N.， dan Arsyad, Y. M.(2022)。[3]刘建军，刘建军。伊斯兰教法研究与发展[j] .伊斯兰教法研究，2015(2):98-107。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Amsir Law Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量