Photovoltaics and battery storage—Python-based optimisation for innovation tenders

Philipp Schreiber, Mathias Hofmann, Marco Wieland
{"title":"Photovoltaics and battery storage—Python-based optimisation for innovation tenders","authors":"Philipp Schreiber, Mathias Hofmann, Marco Wieland","doi":"10.2991/ahe.k.220301.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main concerns in extending variable renewable energy (VRE) is the electric grid stability due to the sources’ volatility. Germany is introducing a new auction mechanism within the German Renewable Energy Sources Act called “Innovationsausschreibung” (innovation tender) to gridand system-supporting VRE-plants operation. The participating hybrid power systems (HPS) must be able to provide one-quarter of their installed power as positive automatic frequency restoration reserve (aFRR). This paper reflects on the optimal operation and design focusing on sizing an HPS consisting of ground-mounted large-scale photovoltaic (PV) and battery energy storage systems (BESS). An optimisation model is developed in Python. It is solved using the Gurobi framework with generation as well as market data for the German spot and balancing market. The optimisation maximises the HPS’s revenue under consideration of the BESS costs for the applications energy arbitrage (EA) and aFRR. A case study for a ground-mounted PV reference project verifies the effectiveness of the model. Ultimately, a sensitivity analysis with long-term market prices and BESS costs along with different bit strategies is conducted. The total revenues less annual BESS costs vary from -3.5% for EA to +10.1% for the sequential combination of EA and participation in the aFRR-market compared to a stand-alone PV system. Considering actual BESS costs and market data, a minimum BESS design is the most economical from today’s perspective. Due to decreasing BESS costs and increasing market volatility, this is expected to change within the next five years. Keywords—Battery storage, Photovoltaics, Optimisation, Operation, Sizing, Innovation tender, Energy arbitrage, Balancing market NOMENCLATURE","PeriodicalId":177278,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis Highlights in Engineering","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis Highlights in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ahe.k.220301.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main concerns in extending variable renewable energy (VRE) is the electric grid stability due to the sources’ volatility. Germany is introducing a new auction mechanism within the German Renewable Energy Sources Act called “Innovationsausschreibung” (innovation tender) to gridand system-supporting VRE-plants operation. The participating hybrid power systems (HPS) must be able to provide one-quarter of their installed power as positive automatic frequency restoration reserve (aFRR). This paper reflects on the optimal operation and design focusing on sizing an HPS consisting of ground-mounted large-scale photovoltaic (PV) and battery energy storage systems (BESS). An optimisation model is developed in Python. It is solved using the Gurobi framework with generation as well as market data for the German spot and balancing market. The optimisation maximises the HPS’s revenue under consideration of the BESS costs for the applications energy arbitrage (EA) and aFRR. A case study for a ground-mounted PV reference project verifies the effectiveness of the model. Ultimately, a sensitivity analysis with long-term market prices and BESS costs along with different bit strategies is conducted. The total revenues less annual BESS costs vary from -3.5% for EA to +10.1% for the sequential combination of EA and participation in the aFRR-market compared to a stand-alone PV system. Considering actual BESS costs and market data, a minimum BESS design is the most economical from today’s perspective. Due to decreasing BESS costs and increasing market volatility, this is expected to change within the next five years. Keywords—Battery storage, Photovoltaics, Optimisation, Operation, Sizing, Innovation tender, Energy arbitrage, Balancing market NOMENCLATURE
光伏和电池存储-基于python的创新招标优化
推广可变可再生能源(VRE)的主要问题之一是由于能源的波动性而导致的电网稳定性。德国正在根据《德国可再生能源法》引入一种新的拍卖机制,称为“创新招标”(Innovationsausschreibung),以支持电网和系统的vre电厂运营。参与的混合动力系统(HPS)必须能够提供其装机功率的四分之一作为积极的自动频率恢复储备(aFRR)。以大型地面光伏(PV)和电池储能系统(BESS)组成的HPS为研究对象,对其优化运行和设计进行了思考。在Python中开发了一个优化模型。该问题的解决使用了德国现货和平衡市场的发电和市场数据的Gurobi框架。在考虑应用能源套利(EA)和aFRR的BESS成本的情况下,优化使HPS的收益最大化。以某地面光伏参考工程为例,验证了该模型的有效性。最后,对长期市场价格和BESS成本以及不同的比特策略进行了敏感性分析。与独立光伏系统相比,总收益减去年度BESS成本从EA的-3.5%到EA和参与afr市场的连续组合的+10.1%不等。考虑到实际的BESS成本和市场数据,从今天的角度来看,最小的BESS设计是最经济的。由于BESS成本的降低和市场波动性的增加,这种情况预计将在未来五年内发生变化。关键词:电池储能,光伏,优化,运行,规模,创新招标,能源套利,平衡市场术语
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信