Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social Relationships

David Jurgens, Agrima Seth, Jack E. Sargent, Athena Aghighi, Michael Geraci
{"title":"Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social Relationships","authors":"David Jurgens, Agrima Seth, Jack E. Sargent, Athena Aghighi, Michael Geraci","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2307.02763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding interpersonal communication requires, in part, understanding the social context and norms in which a message is said. However, current methods for identifying offensive content in such communication largely operate independent of context, with only a few approaches considering community norms or prior conversation as context. Here, we introduce a new approach to identifying inappropriate communication by explicitly modeling the social relationship between the individuals. We introduce a new dataset of contextually-situated judgments of appropriateness and show that large language models can readily incorporate relationship information to accurately identify appropriateness in a given context. Using data from online conversations and movie dialogues, we provide insight into how the relationships themselves function as implicit norms and quantify the degree to which context-sensitivity is needed in different conversation settings. Further, we also demonstrate that contextual-appropriateness judgments are predictive of other social factors expressed in language such as condescension and politeness.","PeriodicalId":352845,"journal":{"name":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","volume":"335 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.02763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding interpersonal communication requires, in part, understanding the social context and norms in which a message is said. However, current methods for identifying offensive content in such communication largely operate independent of context, with only a few approaches considering community norms or prior conversation as context. Here, we introduce a new approach to identifying inappropriate communication by explicitly modeling the social relationship between the individuals. We introduce a new dataset of contextually-situated judgments of appropriateness and show that large language models can readily incorporate relationship information to accurately identify appropriateness in a given context. Using data from online conversations and movie dialogues, we provide insight into how the relationships themselves function as implicit norms and quantify the degree to which context-sensitivity is needed in different conversation settings. Further, we also demonstrate that contextual-appropriateness judgments are predictive of other social factors expressed in language such as condescension and politeness.
你的配偶需要专业帮助:通过模拟社会关系来确定信息的语境适当性
理解人际沟通在一定程度上需要理解信息传递的社会背景和规范。然而,目前识别此类交流中冒犯性内容的方法在很大程度上独立于语境,只有少数方法将社区规范或先前的对话视为语境。在这里,我们引入了一种新的方法,通过明确地模拟个体之间的社会关系来识别不适当的沟通。我们引入了一个新的语境语境判断数据集,并表明大型语言模型可以很容易地结合关系信息,以准确地识别给定语境中的适当性。利用在线对话和电影对话的数据,我们深入了解了关系本身是如何作为隐性规范发挥作用的,并量化了在不同的对话设置中需要上下文敏感性的程度。此外,我们还证明了语境恰当性判断可以预测语言中表达的其他社会因素,如屈尊和礼貌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信