Tax Dispute Analysis of Incorrect VAT Payment on Offshore Royalty viewed from the Ease of Administration Principle (Case Study of PT X)

I. Santoso, Mikha Ningrum, M. Setyowati
{"title":"Tax Dispute Analysis of Incorrect VAT Payment on Offshore Royalty viewed from the Ease of Administration Principle (Case Study of PT X)","authors":"I. Santoso, Mikha Ningrum, M. Setyowati","doi":"10.4108/eai.5-8-2020.2301223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The occurrence of selling and buying transactions cause every companies to do their VAT obligations. Tax reported by PT X which appear to be wrong can be subdued by overbooking, therefore PT X had to bear administrative sanctions. The purpose of this research is to analyze basic considerations from Directorate General of Taxes in making regulations regarding the incorrect transfer of Taxable Services from outside the custom territory which cannot be overbook and analyze whether the administrative sanctions given to taxpayer are appropriate, with Ease of Administration principle in deliberation. This research used a qualitative approach with in-depth interview and literature study for data collection. The result of this research concludes that the primary consideration Directorate General of Taxes made regulations concerning the incorrect transfer of Taxable Services from outside the customs territory is because Intangible Taxable Goods and Taxable Services from outside the customs territory are susceptible to being used by Taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax and the Government’s control are not fully reliable. Because the regulations do not allow to do the overbook, alternative ways taken by PT X to resolve the incorrect transfer of tax is restitution, which causes administrative sanctions. With that being said, administrative sanctions that occur as a result of wrong transfer of tax do not fulfill the Ease of Administration principle.","PeriodicalId":331092,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Business, Accounting and Economics, ICBAE 2020, 5 - 6 August 2020, Purwokerto, Indonesia","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Business, Accounting and Economics, ICBAE 2020, 5 - 6 August 2020, Purwokerto, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.5-8-2020.2301223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The occurrence of selling and buying transactions cause every companies to do their VAT obligations. Tax reported by PT X which appear to be wrong can be subdued by overbooking, therefore PT X had to bear administrative sanctions. The purpose of this research is to analyze basic considerations from Directorate General of Taxes in making regulations regarding the incorrect transfer of Taxable Services from outside the custom territory which cannot be overbook and analyze whether the administrative sanctions given to taxpayer are appropriate, with Ease of Administration principle in deliberation. This research used a qualitative approach with in-depth interview and literature study for data collection. The result of this research concludes that the primary consideration Directorate General of Taxes made regulations concerning the incorrect transfer of Taxable Services from outside the customs territory is because Intangible Taxable Goods and Taxable Services from outside the customs territory are susceptible to being used by Taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax and the Government’s control are not fully reliable. Because the regulations do not allow to do the overbook, alternative ways taken by PT X to resolve the incorrect transfer of tax is restitution, which causes administrative sanctions. With that being said, administrative sanctions that occur as a result of wrong transfer of tax do not fulfill the Ease of Administration principle.
从便于管理原则看离岸特许权使用费不正确缴纳增值税的税务争议分析(以PT X为例)
买卖交易的发生使每个公司都要履行增值税义务。PT X申报的税务出现错误,可以通过超售来掩盖,因此PT X不得不承担行政处罚。本研究的目的是分析税务总局在制定法规时的基本考虑因素,这些法规是关于从关税区域外不正确地转移应税服务而不能超计的,并分析对纳税人的行政制裁是否适当,并考虑便于管理的原则。本研究采用深度访谈和文献研究相结合的定性方法进行数据收集。本文的研究结果表明,税务总局对税区外应税劳务不正确转移的主要考虑因素是,税区外的无形应税货物和应税劳务容易被纳税人用于避税目的,政府的控制不完全可靠。由于规定不允许做超账,PT X解决不正确的转税的替代方法是退还,这将导致行政处罚。尽管如此,由于错误的税收转移而产生的行政制裁并不符合行政便利性原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信