{"title":"\"It's a Fake!\": Early and Late Incredulous Viewers, Trick Effects, and CGI","authors":"Lisa Bode","doi":"10.2979/FILMHISTORY.30.4.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This paper offers a historical inquiry into industry worries about incredulous viewers, prompted by the persistence of claims by prominent contemporary film industry figures that computer-generated imagery (CGI) is intrinsically detrimental to cinematic realism and is eroding viewer immersion in screen fiction. Examining a range of fan and trade magazines from the 1910s and 1920s, I find evidence of an earlier anxiety in the film industry about incredulous viewers. This anxiety, however, was blamed not on the intrinsic unreality of cinematic tricks but a broader film culture, including fake actuality films and journalistic revelations of filmmaking secrets. I show that the industry made a concerted effort to manage such viewership by cultivating uncertainty about the reality or artifice of what appeared on the screen. Finally, moving back to the present, I argue that CGI is not inherently less real. Rather, a broader viewing culture of incredulity has reemerged due to a combination of production publicity, cult viewing of bad cinema, online forums, editorial photoshopping, and image hoaxes.","PeriodicalId":426632,"journal":{"name":"Film History: An International Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film History: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/FILMHISTORY.30.4.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
ABSTRACT:This paper offers a historical inquiry into industry worries about incredulous viewers, prompted by the persistence of claims by prominent contemporary film industry figures that computer-generated imagery (CGI) is intrinsically detrimental to cinematic realism and is eroding viewer immersion in screen fiction. Examining a range of fan and trade magazines from the 1910s and 1920s, I find evidence of an earlier anxiety in the film industry about incredulous viewers. This anxiety, however, was blamed not on the intrinsic unreality of cinematic tricks but a broader film culture, including fake actuality films and journalistic revelations of filmmaking secrets. I show that the industry made a concerted effort to manage such viewership by cultivating uncertainty about the reality or artifice of what appeared on the screen. Finally, moving back to the present, I argue that CGI is not inherently less real. Rather, a broader viewing culture of incredulity has reemerged due to a combination of production publicity, cult viewing of bad cinema, online forums, editorial photoshopping, and image hoaxes.