Effect of Low-Amplitude Oscillation Applied to the Control Device of a Tracking Operation

H. Mukae, A. Yasukouchi
{"title":"Effect of Low-Amplitude Oscillation Applied to the Control Device of a Tracking Operation","authors":"H. Mukae, A. Yasukouchi","doi":"10.54941/ahfe100781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to find a stimulus that improves tracking operation accuracy, low-amplitude oscillation was applied to two types of control device (a grip type and a steering wheel) in a tracking simulation. The tracking operation was as follows: The target cursor moves side to side at a fixed velocity. Subjects control the device with the aim of making the control cursor follow the target cursor. The velocity of the target cursor was set at either a low or a high velocity. The separation between the target cursor and the control cursor (the tracking error) was used to evaluate the task performance. Three oscillation stimuli were used: sin waves of 10, 20, and 40 Hz, each at three different amplitude levels. A no-stimulus experiment was used as a control. In the slow cursor, the tracking error was significantly reduced with the 20 Hz oscillation compared to the control (p\n < 0.05). In the fast cursor, no stimulus improved the accuracy of the tracking operation. On the other hand, the tracking error was significantly increased with the 10 Hz oscillation in comparison to the control (p\n < 0.01). These results suggest that an oscillation of 20 Hz could improve the accuracy of tracking in the slow target. The oscillation of 20 Hz could affect the protagonistic muscles of the operation, and could improve sensitivity of the muscle spindles by stochastic resonance phenomenon. As a result, the devices were operated more accurately and the tracking errors were decreased.\n","PeriodicalId":389707,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Ergonomics In Design, Usability and Special Populations: Part I","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Ergonomics In Design, Usability and Special Populations: Part I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to find a stimulus that improves tracking operation accuracy, low-amplitude oscillation was applied to two types of control device (a grip type and a steering wheel) in a tracking simulation. The tracking operation was as follows: The target cursor moves side to side at a fixed velocity. Subjects control the device with the aim of making the control cursor follow the target cursor. The velocity of the target cursor was set at either a low or a high velocity. The separation between the target cursor and the control cursor (the tracking error) was used to evaluate the task performance. Three oscillation stimuli were used: sin waves of 10, 20, and 40 Hz, each at three different amplitude levels. A no-stimulus experiment was used as a control. In the slow cursor, the tracking error was significantly reduced with the 20 Hz oscillation compared to the control (p < 0.05). In the fast cursor, no stimulus improved the accuracy of the tracking operation. On the other hand, the tracking error was significantly increased with the 10 Hz oscillation in comparison to the control (p < 0.01). These results suggest that an oscillation of 20 Hz could improve the accuracy of tracking in the slow target. The oscillation of 20 Hz could affect the protagonistic muscles of the operation, and could improve sensitivity of the muscle spindles by stochastic resonance phenomenon. As a result, the devices were operated more accurately and the tracking errors were decreased.
低幅振荡对跟踪操作控制装置的影响
为了寻找提高跟踪操作精度的刺激,在跟踪仿真中对两种控制装置(握把式和方向盘)施加了低幅振荡。跟踪操作如下:目标光标以固定速度左右移动。受试者控制设备的目的是使控制光标跟随目标光标。目标光标的速度设置为低速度或高速度。目标游标与控制游标之间的分离度(跟踪误差)被用来评价任务性能。使用了三种振荡刺激:10、20和40赫兹的正弦波,每一个都有三个不同的振幅水平。无刺激实验作为对照。在慢速游标中,与对照组相比,振荡频率为20 Hz的跟踪误差显著减小(p < 0.05)。在快速光标中,无刺激提高了跟踪操作的准确性。另一方面,与对照组相比,当振荡频率为10 Hz时,跟踪误差显著增加(p < 0.01)。这些结果表明,在慢速目标中,20 Hz的振荡可以提高跟踪精度。20 Hz的振荡可以影响到手术的主要肌肉,并且可以通过随机共振现象提高肌肉纺锤体的灵敏度。从而提高了设备的操作精度,减小了跟踪误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信