Antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery--current practice in The Netherlands.

The Netherlands journal of surgery Pub Date : 1990-08-01
W S Meijer
{"title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery--current practice in The Netherlands.","authors":"W S Meijer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A questionnaire about the current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery was sent to the chairmen of the departments of surgery of 175 hospitals in The Netherlands. The Dutch hospitals are classified into three categories depending on the type of residency in general surgery. Overall, 80 per cent replied. Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cholecystectomy is given in 76 per cent of the clinics (100/132), and single-dose prophylaxis is employed in 28 per cent of the clinics (28/100). In patients with acute cholecystitis, emergency surgery is the treatment of choice in 108 hospitals (82%). Differences in antibiotic prophylaxis between the three categories of hospitals include the omission of prophylaxis in elective cholecystectomy in 31 per cent of the C-clinics (vs. 10% in A-clinics and 16% in B-clinics), and the use of single-dose prophylaxis in 13 per cent of the B-clinics (vs. 30% of the A-clinics and 31% of the C-clinics). Since prophylaxis for more than 24 hours has no additional effect and peri-operative prophylaxis in acute cholecystitis is mandatory, antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery is inappropriate in at least 31 hospitals in The Netherlands (23%).</p>","PeriodicalId":77640,"journal":{"name":"The Netherlands journal of surgery","volume":"42 4","pages":"96-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Netherlands journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A questionnaire about the current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery was sent to the chairmen of the departments of surgery of 175 hospitals in The Netherlands. The Dutch hospitals are classified into three categories depending on the type of residency in general surgery. Overall, 80 per cent replied. Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cholecystectomy is given in 76 per cent of the clinics (100/132), and single-dose prophylaxis is employed in 28 per cent of the clinics (28/100). In patients with acute cholecystitis, emergency surgery is the treatment of choice in 108 hospitals (82%). Differences in antibiotic prophylaxis between the three categories of hospitals include the omission of prophylaxis in elective cholecystectomy in 31 per cent of the C-clinics (vs. 10% in A-clinics and 16% in B-clinics), and the use of single-dose prophylaxis in 13 per cent of the B-clinics (vs. 30% of the A-clinics and 31% of the C-clinics). Since prophylaxis for more than 24 hours has no additional effect and peri-operative prophylaxis in acute cholecystitis is mandatory, antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery is inappropriate in at least 31 hospitals in The Netherlands (23%).

胆道手术中的抗生素预防——荷兰目前的做法。
向荷兰175家医院的外科主任发送了一份关于目前胆道手术中抗生素预防做法的调查问卷。荷兰医院根据普通外科住院医师的类型分为三类。总的来说,80%的人回答了。76%的诊所(100/132)在选择性胆囊切除术中提供抗生素预防,28%的诊所(28/100)采用单剂量预防。108家医院(82%)的急性胆囊炎患者选择急诊手术治疗。三类医院在抗生素预防方面的差异包括,31%的c类诊所在选择性胆囊切除术中不使用抗生素预防(a类诊所为10%,b类诊所为16%),13%的b类诊所使用单剂量抗生素预防(a类诊所为30%,c类诊所为31%)。由于预防超过24小时没有额外的效果,急性胆囊炎的围手术期预防是强制性的,在荷兰至少31家医院(23%)胆道手术中抗生素预防是不合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信