Analysis of factors That Influence Buying Decisions in The Covid-19 Pandemi Era

Sarbullah, Yovita Mumpuni Hartarini, Tri Cahyadi
{"title":"Analysis of factors That Influence Buying Decisions in The Covid-19 Pandemi Era","authors":"Sarbullah, Yovita Mumpuni Hartarini, Tri Cahyadi","doi":"10.56799/jceki.v2i1.1195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine Analysis of Factors That Influence Buying Decisions in The Covid-19 Pandemi Era (Case Study in Bear Brand Drinking Milk Beverage Products). This type of research was s quantitative correlation with a cross-sectional approach. Data collection techniques using questionnaires. The analysis technique used was multiple regression analysis. The independent variables were product quality, price, promotion, and testimonials and the dependent variable was buying decisions. Methods of data analysis using multiple linear regression with the SPSS 25.0 program. Based on the data analysis shows that: (1) It was found that the Product Quality variable (X1) in buying decisions (Y). It was known that the Sig value for the effect (X1) on (Y) was 0.211 > 0.05 and the tcount value was 1.262 < t table 2.000, so it can be concluded that H1 was rejected which means there was no effect (X1) on (Y). (2) Price (X2) on buying decisions (Y) It was known that the Sig value for the effect (X2) on (Y) was 0.913 > 0.05 and the tcount is-0.110 < t table 2.000, so it can be concluded that H1 was rejected which means there was no effect (X2) against (Y). (3) It was known that the Sig value for the effect (X3) on (Y) was 0.043 <0.05 and the tcount was 2.061 > t table 2.000, so it can be concluded that H1 was accepted which means there was an effect (X3) on (Y). (4) It was known that the Sig value for the effect (X4) on (Y) was 0.478 > 0.05 and the tcount was 0.714 < t table 2.000, so it can be concluded that H1 was rejected which means there was no effect (X4) on (Y). Product quality was needed to increase consumer attractiveness. The importance of optimizing affordable prices to be able to compete in the trade market. Attractive promotions can lure customers to always use the same product. Testimonials in an interesting manner by conveying relevant.","PeriodicalId":123520,"journal":{"name":"J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v2i1.1195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine Analysis of Factors That Influence Buying Decisions in The Covid-19 Pandemi Era (Case Study in Bear Brand Drinking Milk Beverage Products). This type of research was s quantitative correlation with a cross-sectional approach. Data collection techniques using questionnaires. The analysis technique used was multiple regression analysis. The independent variables were product quality, price, promotion, and testimonials and the dependent variable was buying decisions. Methods of data analysis using multiple linear regression with the SPSS 25.0 program. Based on the data analysis shows that: (1) It was found that the Product Quality variable (X1) in buying decisions (Y). It was known that the Sig value for the effect (X1) on (Y) was 0.211 > 0.05 and the tcount value was 1.262 < t table 2.000, so it can be concluded that H1 was rejected which means there was no effect (X1) on (Y). (2) Price (X2) on buying decisions (Y) It was known that the Sig value for the effect (X2) on (Y) was 0.913 > 0.05 and the tcount is-0.110 < t table 2.000, so it can be concluded that H1 was rejected which means there was no effect (X2) against (Y). (3) It was known that the Sig value for the effect (X3) on (Y) was 0.043 <0.05 and the tcount was 2.061 > t table 2.000, so it can be concluded that H1 was accepted which means there was an effect (X3) on (Y). (4) It was known that the Sig value for the effect (X4) on (Y) was 0.478 > 0.05 and the tcount was 0.714 < t table 2.000, so it can be concluded that H1 was rejected which means there was no effect (X4) on (Y). Product quality was needed to increase consumer attractiveness. The importance of optimizing affordable prices to be able to compete in the trade market. Attractive promotions can lure customers to always use the same product. Testimonials in an interesting manner by conveying relevant.
Covid-19大流行时代影响购买决策的因素分析
本研究旨在确定Covid-19大流行时代影响购买决策的因素分析(以贝尔斯登品牌饮用乳饮料产品为例)。这类研究采用横断面方法进行定量相关。使用问卷的数据收集技术。分析方法为多元回归分析。自变量是产品质量、价格、促销和推荐,因变量是购买决策。数据分析方法采用SPSS 25.0程序进行多元线性回归。根据数据分析表明:(1)发现产品质量变量(Y) (X1)购买决策。它是知道的Sig值效应(X1) (Y) 0.211 > 0.05, tcount值为1.262 < t表2.000,所以可以得出结论,H1拒绝这意味着没有影响(X1) (Y)。(2)对购买决定(Y)的价格(X2),这是众所周知的Sig值效应(X2) (Y)为0.913 > 0.05,tcount - 0.110 < t表2.000,因此可以得出结论,H1拒绝这意味着没有影响(X2)反对(Y)。(3),这是众所周知的Sig值效应(X3) (Y)为0.043 t表2.000,因此可以认为H1接受了这意味着有一个效应(X3) (Y)。(4),这是众所周知的Sig值效应(X4) (Y)是0.478 > 0.05,tcount 0.714 < t表2.000,因此可以得出结论,H1被拒绝,这意味着(X4)对(Y)没有影响。需要产品质量来增加消费者的吸引力。优化可承受价格的重要性,以便能够在贸易市场上竞争。有吸引力的促销可以吸引顾客总是使用同一种产品。推荐书以有趣的方式传达相关内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信