Sonic Pipelines at the Seafloor

L. Han
{"title":"Sonic Pipelines at the Seafloor","authors":"L. Han","doi":"10.1525/001C.21392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How did the offshore oil industry develop the means to image the seafloor with photographic precision? What are the stakes of producing images through processes that simultaneously produce carcasses? This essay addresses these questions by charting the ambivalent history of reflection seismology from the 1940s to the present day. In the postwar era, when offshore drilling was just emerging, companies like Union Oil, Shell Oil, Macco Corporation, and affiliated researchers were key actors in the development of offshore prospecting techniques. From wire sounding technologies like the soundfish to modern airgun surveys, the hunt for energy resources paved the way for high-resolution imaging of the ocean floor, despite devastating ecological casualties. Drawing from sound studies scholarship in addition to interviews and oceanographic records, this essay focuses on how petroleum surveys have affected the material space of their interventions. In particular, I theorize the survey as a distinct framework for knowledge that privileges comprehensive and continuous information feeds. I contend that the repeated bias toward frictionless signal in combination with discourses of energy security has obscured and even justified the harmful ecological impacts of reflection seismology on ocean environments. Ultimately, I argue that rather than starting with the visual abstractions of survey maps and seismic images, attention must be returned to the violent sonic “bangs” of surveying—a recurring event that is inseparable from the nonhuman and environmental agencies, casualties, and affects that co-constitute the media-making process.","PeriodicalId":235953,"journal":{"name":"Media+Environment","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media+Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/001C.21392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How did the offshore oil industry develop the means to image the seafloor with photographic precision? What are the stakes of producing images through processes that simultaneously produce carcasses? This essay addresses these questions by charting the ambivalent history of reflection seismology from the 1940s to the present day. In the postwar era, when offshore drilling was just emerging, companies like Union Oil, Shell Oil, Macco Corporation, and affiliated researchers were key actors in the development of offshore prospecting techniques. From wire sounding technologies like the soundfish to modern airgun surveys, the hunt for energy resources paved the way for high-resolution imaging of the ocean floor, despite devastating ecological casualties. Drawing from sound studies scholarship in addition to interviews and oceanographic records, this essay focuses on how petroleum surveys have affected the material space of their interventions. In particular, I theorize the survey as a distinct framework for knowledge that privileges comprehensive and continuous information feeds. I contend that the repeated bias toward frictionless signal in combination with discourses of energy security has obscured and even justified the harmful ecological impacts of reflection seismology on ocean environments. Ultimately, I argue that rather than starting with the visual abstractions of survey maps and seismic images, attention must be returned to the violent sonic “bangs” of surveying—a recurring event that is inseparable from the nonhuman and environmental agencies, casualties, and affects that co-constitute the media-making process.
海底声波管道
海上石油工业是如何发展出具有摄影精度的海底成像手段的?通过同时产生尸体的过程来产生图像的风险是什么?本文通过描绘反射地震学从20世纪40年代至今的矛盾历史来解决这些问题。在战后海上钻探刚刚兴起的时代,联合石油公司、壳牌石油公司、麦考公司等公司及其附属研究人员是海上勘探技术发展的关键参与者。从像声鱼这样的电线探测技术到现代气枪调查,寻找能源资源为海底的高分辨率成像铺平了道路,尽管造成了毁灭性的生态损失。除了访谈和海洋学记录外,本文还借鉴了良好的研究成果,重点关注石油调查如何影响其干预的物质空间。特别地,我将调查理论化为一种独特的知识框架,它赋予了全面和连续的信息馈送特权。我认为,对无摩擦信号的反复偏见与能源安全的话语相结合,掩盖了反射地震学对海洋环境的有害生态影响,甚至证明了这一点。最后,我认为,与其从测量地图和地震图像的视觉抽象开始,我们的注意力必须回到测量过程中剧烈的声音“砰”的一声——这是一个反复出现的事件,与非人类和环境机构、伤亡和影响密不可分,它们共同构成了媒体制作过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信