Staging Memorialization

Charlotte Heath-Kelly
{"title":"Staging Memorialization","authors":"Charlotte Heath-Kelly","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190863456.013.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the staging of memory in public architecture, emphasizing the spatial and temporal dynamics of commemorative performance. While we are familiar with post-terrorist space being redesigned to perform resilient nationalism, other affected terrain is “off-staged” by recovery planners into the realm of economic regeneration. The chapter reflects upon the spatial staging of 9/11 recovery in Manhattan which splits urban terrain into symbolic and economic zones, ‘off-staging’ the city’s prioritization of business interests during disaster management. Beyond these spatial divisions in the staging of terrorism memory, memorials also conceive of audiences in radically distinct temporal zones. Design teams are presented with briefs that identify their audiences in the contemporary moment but also 100, 150, and even 250 years into the future. The memorial is expected to perform the disaster event, to educate an audience of whom we have no knowledge. The chapter deconstructs this temporal leap, showing that memorializing for the future does not only serve an educational purpose but performatively mitigates anxieties about the erasure of the present from the world stage. By addressing a future audience, the terrorism memorial performatively stages a concern for us from future beings. The chapter analyzes this ritualized address to the future as transferring from burial necrogeography. The terrorism memorial– and its particular staging practices – respond to anxieties about the erasure of traditional foundations for political authority during globalization, which has led to an increased reliance on performative architectural objects.","PeriodicalId":107426,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Politics and Performance","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Politics and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190863456.013.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the staging of memory in public architecture, emphasizing the spatial and temporal dynamics of commemorative performance. While we are familiar with post-terrorist space being redesigned to perform resilient nationalism, other affected terrain is “off-staged” by recovery planners into the realm of economic regeneration. The chapter reflects upon the spatial staging of 9/11 recovery in Manhattan which splits urban terrain into symbolic and economic zones, ‘off-staging’ the city’s prioritization of business interests during disaster management. Beyond these spatial divisions in the staging of terrorism memory, memorials also conceive of audiences in radically distinct temporal zones. Design teams are presented with briefs that identify their audiences in the contemporary moment but also 100, 150, and even 250 years into the future. The memorial is expected to perform the disaster event, to educate an audience of whom we have no knowledge. The chapter deconstructs this temporal leap, showing that memorializing for the future does not only serve an educational purpose but performatively mitigates anxieties about the erasure of the present from the world stage. By addressing a future audience, the terrorism memorial performatively stages a concern for us from future beings. The chapter analyzes this ritualized address to the future as transferring from burial necrogeography. The terrorism memorial– and its particular staging practices – respond to anxieties about the erasure of traditional foundations for political authority during globalization, which has led to an increased reliance on performative architectural objects.
分段Memorialization
这一章探讨了公共建筑中记忆的分期,强调纪念表演的空间和时间动态。当我们熟悉后恐怖主义空间被重新设计以执行有弹性的民族主义时,其他受影响的领域被复苏规划者“脱离舞台”进入经济再生领域。这一章反映了曼哈顿9/11恢复的空间分期,将城市地形划分为象征性和经济区,“脱离”了城市在灾难管理期间优先考虑商业利益的阶段。除了恐怖主义记忆的这些空间划分之外,纪念馆还将观众设想为截然不同的时间区域。设计团队会收到一份简报,以确定他们在当代的受众,以及未来100年、150年甚至250年的受众。纪念馆将表演灾难事件,教育我们不了解的观众。这一章解构了这种时间上的飞跃,表明为未来而纪念不仅具有教育目的,而且在表演上减轻了人们对从世界舞台上抹去现在的焦虑。通过向未来的观众致辞,恐怖主义纪念馆表现出了未来人类对我们的关注。本章分析了这种仪式化的对未来的称呼是从墓葬墓地地理学转移过来的。恐怖主义纪念馆及其特殊的舞台实践回应了人们对全球化过程中政治权威的传统基础被抹去的焦虑,这导致人们越来越依赖于表现性建筑对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信