This One Simple Trick Disrupts Digital Communities

Philip G. Feldman, Aaron Dant, W. Lutters
{"title":"This One Simple Trick Disrupts Digital Communities","authors":"Philip G. Feldman, Aaron Dant, W. Lutters","doi":"10.1109/SASO.2018.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an agent based simulation used to model human actions in belief space, a high-dimensional subset of information space associated with opinions. Using insights from animal collective behavior, we are able to simulate and identify behavior patterns that are similar to nomadic, flocking and stampeding patterns of animal groups. These behaviors have analogous manifestations in human interaction, emerging as solitary explorers, the fashion-conscious, and echo chambers, whose members are only aware of each other. We demonstrate that a small portion of nomadic agents that widely traverse belief space can disrupt a larger population of stampeding agents. We then model the concept of Adversarial Herding, where trolls, adversaries or other bad actors can exploit properties of technologically mediated communication to artificially create self sustaining runaway polarization. We call this condition the Pishkin Effect as it recalls the large scale buffalo stampedes that could be created by native Americans hunters. We then discuss opportunities for system design that could leverage the ability to recognize these negative patterns, and discuss affordances that may disrupt the formation of natural and deliberate echo chambers.","PeriodicalId":405522,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO)","volume":"518 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SASO.2018.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper describes an agent based simulation used to model human actions in belief space, a high-dimensional subset of information space associated with opinions. Using insights from animal collective behavior, we are able to simulate and identify behavior patterns that are similar to nomadic, flocking and stampeding patterns of animal groups. These behaviors have analogous manifestations in human interaction, emerging as solitary explorers, the fashion-conscious, and echo chambers, whose members are only aware of each other. We demonstrate that a small portion of nomadic agents that widely traverse belief space can disrupt a larger population of stampeding agents. We then model the concept of Adversarial Herding, where trolls, adversaries or other bad actors can exploit properties of technologically mediated communication to artificially create self sustaining runaway polarization. We call this condition the Pishkin Effect as it recalls the large scale buffalo stampedes that could be created by native Americans hunters. We then discuss opportunities for system design that could leverage the ability to recognize these negative patterns, and discuss affordances that may disrupt the formation of natural and deliberate echo chambers.
这个简单的技巧破坏了数字社区
本文描述了一种基于智能体的仿真方法,用于在信念空间(与意见相关的信息空间的高维子集)中对人类行为进行建模。利用对动物集体行为的洞察,我们能够模拟和识别类似于动物群体的游牧、群集和踩踏模式的行为模式。这些行为在人类交往中也有类似的表现,出现在孤独的探险家、时尚意识和回声室中,这些回声室的成员只知道彼此。我们证明了一小部分广泛穿越信念空间的游牧主体可以扰乱更大的踩踏主体群体。然后,我们建立了对抗性羊群的概念模型,在这个概念中,喷子、对手或其他不良行为者可以利用技术媒介传播的特性,人为地创造自我维持的失控极化。我们称这种情况为“皮什金效应”,因为它让人想起美国土著猎人可能造成的大规模水牛踩踏事件。然后,我们讨论了系统设计的机会,可以利用识别这些消极模式的能力,并讨论了可能破坏自然和故意回声室形成的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信