Prospect of Threads in Contrast to Twitter as an Online Social Network Tool for Conflict Resolution

A. Afolaranmi
{"title":"Prospect of Threads in Contrast to Twitter as an Online Social Network Tool for Conflict Resolution","authors":"A. Afolaranmi","doi":"10.37745/bjmas.2022.0250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new online social network service – Threads – was recently created and launched by Mark Zuckerberg to compete with Twitter. The rate at which people throughout the world accepted and created accounts on this new social network within hours of its creation and launching was prodigious. Conflicts have been inevitable in the world. As one of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations (SDGs) (Goal 16) has to do with peaceful coexistence by the year 2030, this paper aims at comparing the features of Twitter that can be used for conflict resolution to the emerging features of Threads. The paper gives the origin and acceptance of Threads. The discussion in the paper is based on the review of some selected literature, Public Sphere as a Theory of social media, an empirical review of a previous study, and comparisons of some features of Twitter with those of Threads. The paper concluded by giving a recommendation that while Twitter as a social network should not be jettisoned especially in resolving conflicts, the new social network – Threads – should be studied more to discover how it can be used better to resolve conflicts and promote peaceful coexistence in society thereby achieving Goal 16 of the SDGs by the year 2030.","PeriodicalId":421703,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies","volume":"174 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A new online social network service – Threads – was recently created and launched by Mark Zuckerberg to compete with Twitter. The rate at which people throughout the world accepted and created accounts on this new social network within hours of its creation and launching was prodigious. Conflicts have been inevitable in the world. As one of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations (SDGs) (Goal 16) has to do with peaceful coexistence by the year 2030, this paper aims at comparing the features of Twitter that can be used for conflict resolution to the emerging features of Threads. The paper gives the origin and acceptance of Threads. The discussion in the paper is based on the review of some selected literature, Public Sphere as a Theory of social media, an empirical review of a previous study, and comparisons of some features of Twitter with those of Threads. The paper concluded by giving a recommendation that while Twitter as a social network should not be jettisoned especially in resolving conflicts, the new social network – Threads – should be studied more to discover how it can be used better to resolve conflicts and promote peaceful coexistence in society thereby achieving Goal 16 of the SDGs by the year 2030.
与Twitter相比,线程作为解决冲突的在线社交网络工具的前景
马克·扎克伯格最近创建并推出了一个新的在线社交网络服务——Threads,以与Twitter竞争。在这个新的社交网络创建和发布的几个小时内,世界各地的人们接受和创建账户的速度惊人。世界上冲突是不可避免的。由于联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)之一(目标16)与2030年的和平共处有关,本文旨在比较Twitter可用于解决冲突的功能与Threads的新兴功能。本文介绍了线程的起源和接受情况。本文的讨论是基于对一些选定文献的回顾,公共领域作为社交媒体的理论,对先前研究的实证回顾,以及Twitter和Threads的一些特征的比较。论文最后给出了一个建议,虽然Twitter作为一个社交网络不应该被抛弃,特别是在解决冲突方面,新的社交网络-线程-应该更多地研究,以发现如何更好地利用它来解决冲突,促进社会和平共处,从而在2030年实现可持续发展目标的第16个目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信