Iterative Design and Evaluation of Regulatory Network Visualisation at Scale

S. Smith, J. Hogan, Xin-Yi Chua, M. Brereton, Daniel M. Johnson, Markus Rittenbruch
{"title":"Iterative Design and Evaluation of Regulatory Network Visualisation at Scale","authors":"S. Smith, J. Hogan, Xin-Yi Chua, M. Brereton, Daniel M. Johnson, Markus Rittenbruch","doi":"10.1109/eScience.2017.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, the development of a range of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has led to an enormous increase in the size of the data sets available in molecular biology. The scale of these data presents new challenges for researchers, and visualisation is widely regarded as an essential tool for exploration and detailed analysis of candidate relationships. Inevitably, there are cognitive and technical limits on the information which may usefully be displayed on a particular device, and there may be some tension between the analytical utility of a representation and its coverage of the relationships available within the data. Careful attention must be given to the overall design of the visualisation, and to the channels selected, and these tasks are further complicated if the intent is to support interactive exploration by a number of collocated researchers or inclusion within a collaborative workflow. This paper is concerned with the design of a visualisation for regulatory interactions in bacteria, the complex relationships that exist between a set of proteins and the much larger set of genes whose action they control. Modelling these interactions yields equally complex network diagrams, and even classical hairball representations when visualised. In this work we explore the iterative refinement of an alternative visualisation for data of this kind, moving away from the traditional hairball to a 'field' of smaller structures, the intent being to support effective comparison across many dozens of strains and species rather than the exhaustive documentation of a full set of interactions for the one organism. While the study did not directly compare insights obtained using TRNDiff with those obtained using other tools, formal evaluations have allowed us to settle on an effective set of representations and visual channels, and interactive features to support analysis. Our approach has produced a far more effective visualisation of these important data sets, and offers useful lessons for tool developers and insights into the utility of touch devices and larger displays for visual analytics and generation of insight at scale.","PeriodicalId":137652,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2017.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade, the development of a range of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has led to an enormous increase in the size of the data sets available in molecular biology. The scale of these data presents new challenges for researchers, and visualisation is widely regarded as an essential tool for exploration and detailed analysis of candidate relationships. Inevitably, there are cognitive and technical limits on the information which may usefully be displayed on a particular device, and there may be some tension between the analytical utility of a representation and its coverage of the relationships available within the data. Careful attention must be given to the overall design of the visualisation, and to the channels selected, and these tasks are further complicated if the intent is to support interactive exploration by a number of collocated researchers or inclusion within a collaborative workflow. This paper is concerned with the design of a visualisation for regulatory interactions in bacteria, the complex relationships that exist between a set of proteins and the much larger set of genes whose action they control. Modelling these interactions yields equally complex network diagrams, and even classical hairball representations when visualised. In this work we explore the iterative refinement of an alternative visualisation for data of this kind, moving away from the traditional hairball to a 'field' of smaller structures, the intent being to support effective comparison across many dozens of strains and species rather than the exhaustive documentation of a full set of interactions for the one organism. While the study did not directly compare insights obtained using TRNDiff with those obtained using other tools, formal evaluations have allowed us to settle on an effective set of representations and visual channels, and interactive features to support analysis. Our approach has produced a far more effective visualisation of these important data sets, and offers useful lessons for tool developers and insights into the utility of touch devices and larger displays for visual analytics and generation of insight at scale.
大规模监管网络可视化的迭代设计和评估
在过去的十年中,一系列下一代测序(NGS)技术的发展导致了分子生物学中可用数据集规模的巨大增加。这些数据的规模为研究人员提出了新的挑战,可视化被广泛认为是探索和详细分析候选关系的重要工具。不可避免地,在特定设备上有效显示的信息存在认知和技术限制,并且在表示的分析效用与其对数据中可用关系的覆盖之间可能存在一些紧张关系。必须仔细注意可视化的整体设计和选择的通道,如果目的是支持许多协同研究人员的交互式探索或包含在协作工作流程中,则这些任务将进一步复杂化。本文关注的是细菌中调节相互作用的可视化设计,一组蛋白质和它们控制作用的更大的一组基因之间存在复杂的关系。对这些相互作用的建模产生同样复杂的网络图,甚至在可视化时产生经典的毛球表示。在这项工作中,我们探索了这类数据的替代可视化的迭代改进,从传统的毛球转移到更小结构的“场”,目的是支持在许多菌株和物种之间进行有效比较,而不是对一种生物的一整套相互作用进行详尽的记录。虽然这项研究没有直接比较使用TRNDiff获得的见解与使用其他工具获得的见解,但正式的评估使我们能够确定一套有效的表示和视觉通道,以及支持分析的交互功能。我们的方法为这些重要数据集提供了更有效的可视化,并为工具开发人员提供了有用的经验教训,并深入了解了触摸设备和更大显示器的实用功能,以进行大规模的可视化分析和生成洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信