Social Conditions оf the Criminalization of Collaborative Activities іn Ukraine

A. Sorokin
{"title":"Social Conditions оf the Criminalization of Collaborative Activities іn Ukraine","authors":"A. Sorokin","doi":"10.21564/2225-6555.2022.2.267651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of criminal law measures or criminal liability for violation of legal norms is an exclusive and particularly strict measure of state coercion, therefore the question of the feasibility and correctness of introducing a new article into the criminal law is extremely urgent. The purpose of the article is to clarify the essence and grounds of criminalization of collaborative activities in Ukraine. The methodology consists of terminological, system-structural methods, the method of analysis and synthesis, and logical-deductive. It is noted that social conditionality is the state’s response to society’s need to introduce a new level and quality of guarantees of legality. The main task of social conditionality is the study of the circumstances that affect the creation of norms and institutions of criminal legislation and their effectiveness. It has been proven that the criminalization of collaborative activity is conditioned by a number of reasons (the existence of socially dangerous behavior that requires a criminal law prohibition, the relative prevalence of socially dangerous acts, a change in ideas about the nature and degree of social danger of an act, a change in the generally recognized moral assessment of the relevant act, the insufficiency of available means, other than criminal law, to effectively counteract these acts, the need for a criminal law guarantee of rights and freedoms), which are objective in nature and in together, they determine the need to introduce criminal liability for such an act. Prospects for the author’s future research are the study of the practices of foreign states regarding the criminalization of collaborative activities.","PeriodicalId":285666,"journal":{"name":"Theory and practice of jurisprudence","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and practice of jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2022.2.267651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of criminal law measures or criminal liability for violation of legal norms is an exclusive and particularly strict measure of state coercion, therefore the question of the feasibility and correctness of introducing a new article into the criminal law is extremely urgent. The purpose of the article is to clarify the essence and grounds of criminalization of collaborative activities in Ukraine. The methodology consists of terminological, system-structural methods, the method of analysis and synthesis, and logical-deductive. It is noted that social conditionality is the state’s response to society’s need to introduce a new level and quality of guarantees of legality. The main task of social conditionality is the study of the circumstances that affect the creation of norms and institutions of criminal legislation and their effectiveness. It has been proven that the criminalization of collaborative activity is conditioned by a number of reasons (the existence of socially dangerous behavior that requires a criminal law prohibition, the relative prevalence of socially dangerous acts, a change in ideas about the nature and degree of social danger of an act, a change in the generally recognized moral assessment of the relevant act, the insufficiency of available means, other than criminal law, to effectively counteract these acts, the need for a criminal law guarantee of rights and freedoms), which are objective in nature and in together, they determine the need to introduce criminal liability for such an act. Prospects for the author’s future research are the study of the practices of foreign states regarding the criminalization of collaborative activities.
乌克兰协作活动刑事定罪的社会条件
刑法措施的适用或违反法律规范的刑事责任是国家强制的一种排他性的、特别严格的措施,因此,在刑法中引入新条款的可行性和正确性问题迫在眉睫。本文的目的是澄清在乌克兰将合作活动定为刑事犯罪的本质和理由。方法论包括术语法、系统结构法、分析综合法和逻辑演绎法。人们注意到,社会条件性是国家对社会需要提出新的法律保障水平和质量的反应。社会条件性的主要任务是研究影响刑事立法规范和机构的建立及其效力的各种情况。事实证明,合作活动的犯罪化是由许多原因决定的(社会危险行为的存在需要刑法禁止,社会危险行为的相对流行,对行为的社会危险性质和程度的看法发生变化,对相关行为的普遍公认的道德评估发生变化,除了刑法之外,有效对抗这些行为的可用手段不足,需要一项保障权利和自由的刑法,这些权利和自由在本质上是客观的,它们一起决定了需要对这种行为实行刑事责任。作者未来研究的前景是研究外国对合作活动的刑事定罪的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信