The Polish Deal’s changes to the tax system versus the compatibility of fiscal policy goals

Beata Guziejewska, I. Witczak
{"title":"The Polish Deal’s changes to the tax system versus the compatibility of fiscal policy goals","authors":"Beata Guziejewska, I. Witczak","doi":"10.15290/oes.2022.02.108.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – An evaluation of changes in the Polish tax system resulting from the governmental prog-ramme called the Polish Deal and an analysis of their consequences for taxpayers with respect to the objectives of a rational and coherent tax system. Research method – A critical analysis of the pertinent literature and tax laws. Conclusions are formu-lated using a deductive method drawing on the achievements of tax theory and the analysis of tax laws. Results – The tax system changes contained in the Polish Deal do not constitute a full-scale reform of the tax system. They were hastily introduced without a thorough analysis of their economic, finan-cial and social consequences. It is disputable whether they will make the tax system fairer as intended and their effects will only be known in the future. Also, they do not ensure compatibility between direct and indirect taxes and do not support the stability of the tax system. Originality/value/implications/recommendations – Tax system changes that are ill-conceived and disre-gard the redistributive function of taxes may have consequences other than expected. The main out-come of a tax system revision should be the compatibility between all fiscal policy goals rather than between some of its elements and the stability and transparency of tax laws.","PeriodicalId":373923,"journal":{"name":"Optimum. Economic Studies","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimum. Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/oes.2022.02.108.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose – An evaluation of changes in the Polish tax system resulting from the governmental prog-ramme called the Polish Deal and an analysis of their consequences for taxpayers with respect to the objectives of a rational and coherent tax system. Research method – A critical analysis of the pertinent literature and tax laws. Conclusions are formu-lated using a deductive method drawing on the achievements of tax theory and the analysis of tax laws. Results – The tax system changes contained in the Polish Deal do not constitute a full-scale reform of the tax system. They were hastily introduced without a thorough analysis of their economic, finan-cial and social consequences. It is disputable whether they will make the tax system fairer as intended and their effects will only be known in the future. Also, they do not ensure compatibility between direct and indirect taxes and do not support the stability of the tax system. Originality/value/implications/recommendations – Tax system changes that are ill-conceived and disre-gard the redistributive function of taxes may have consequences other than expected. The main out-come of a tax system revision should be the compatibility between all fiscal policy goals rather than between some of its elements and the stability and transparency of tax laws.
波兰协议对税收制度的改变与财政政策目标的兼容性
目的-对波兰税收制度的变化进行评估,这些变化是由波兰政府计划引起的,并分析其对纳税人的影响,以实现合理和连贯的税收制度的目标。研究方法-对相关文献和税法进行批判性分析。结论是利用税收理论成果和税法分析的演绎法制定的。结果-波兰协议中所载的税制变化并不构成税制的全面改革。它们是在没有对其经济、金融和社会后果进行彻底分析的情况下匆忙推出的。它们是否会像预期的那样使税收系统更加公平,这是有争议的,它们的影响只有在未来才能知道。此外,它们不能确保直接税和间接税之间的兼容性,也不支持税收制度的稳定性。独创性/价值/影响/建议-考虑不周的税制改革和忽视税收的再分配功能可能会产生超出预期的后果。税收制度修订的主要结果应该是所有财政政策目标之间的兼容性,而不是其某些要素与税法的稳定性和透明度之间的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信