Critical Analysis of The Policy of Mediation Time in The Employment Disputes Settlement

Ilham Aji Pangestu, Fitri Fitri
{"title":"Critical Analysis of The Policy of Mediation Time in The Employment Disputes Settlement","authors":"Ilham Aji Pangestu, Fitri Fitri","doi":"10.35724/mularev.v4i2.4132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relationship among stakeholders in an industrial environment does not always run well. The conflicts within an industrial relationship are common, and they are known as industrial relation disputes. However, the disputes must be settled such as by mediation. This study aimed to analyze and investigate the 30 (thirty) day mediation period specified by Article 15 of the PPHI Law for the settlement of industrial relation disputes by the mediator. This study is a normative legal study utilizing a statutory approach and a case approach in which legal materials were gained through literature review. It was found that the settlement period must be completed by the mediator was ideally considering two aspects: the number of cases and the number of mediators. The researchers suggested that the provisions of Article 15 of the PPHI Law cannot be implemented equally; due to each region have the different number of cases and the number of mediators. In addition, the non-ideal number of functional mediators was taking into account the aspect of the number of cases received, so currently the service and technical implementation of the settlements do not run optimally. Based on the results of the study, the researcher suggests the stakeholders: first, to revise Article 15 of the PPHI Law, which is related to the period of time for the mediator in completing the duties. Second, to increase the number of functional mediators by considering the number of cases received.","PeriodicalId":403227,"journal":{"name":"Musamus Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musamus Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35724/mularev.v4i2.4132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relationship among stakeholders in an industrial environment does not always run well. The conflicts within an industrial relationship are common, and they are known as industrial relation disputes. However, the disputes must be settled such as by mediation. This study aimed to analyze and investigate the 30 (thirty) day mediation period specified by Article 15 of the PPHI Law for the settlement of industrial relation disputes by the mediator. This study is a normative legal study utilizing a statutory approach and a case approach in which legal materials were gained through literature review. It was found that the settlement period must be completed by the mediator was ideally considering two aspects: the number of cases and the number of mediators. The researchers suggested that the provisions of Article 15 of the PPHI Law cannot be implemented equally; due to each region have the different number of cases and the number of mediators. In addition, the non-ideal number of functional mediators was taking into account the aspect of the number of cases received, so currently the service and technical implementation of the settlements do not run optimally. Based on the results of the study, the researcher suggests the stakeholders: first, to revise Article 15 of the PPHI Law, which is related to the period of time for the mediator in completing the duties. Second, to increase the number of functional mediators by considering the number of cases received.
劳动争议调解中调解时间政策的批判性分析
在工业环境中,利益相关者之间的关系并不总是运行良好。劳资关系中的冲突是常见的,它们被称为劳资关系纠纷。但是,纠纷必须通过调解等方式解决。本研究旨在分析与探讨《劳资关系法》第15条规定的劳资关系纠纷调解员调解30天的期限。本研究是一项规范的法律研究,采用成文法方法和案例方法,通过文献回顾获得法律材料。人们发现,解决期间必须由调解员完成的理想情况是考虑两个方面:案件数量和调解员数量。研究者认为,《个人医疗信息保护法》第15条的规定不能平等执行;由于每个地区的案件数量和调解员数量不同。此外,考虑到所收到的案件数量方面,功能性调解员的人数并不理想,因此目前解决方案的服务和技术执行没有达到最佳状态。基于研究结果,研究者建议利益相关方:首先,修改与调解员履行职责的时间有关的PPHI法第15条。第二,考虑到收到的案件数量,增加功能调解员的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信