The use of cluster analysis in clinical chemical diagnosis of liver diseases.

U Folkerts, D Nagel, W Vogt
{"title":"The use of cluster analysis in clinical chemical diagnosis of liver diseases.","authors":"U Folkerts,&nbsp;D Nagel,&nbsp;W Vogt","doi":"10.1515/cclm.1990.28.6.399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic judgement is usually based on recognition of patterns. Unfortunately more than three quantitative data cannot be judged simultaneously without help of mathematical methods. Working on laboratory reports, a clinician usually goes linearly through the columns and reduces quantitative to qualitative data. Therefore the medical decision process should be improved if data reduction is performed with the aid of mathematical methods for pattern recognition. A total of 191 consecutive outpatients with a tentative or proven diagnosis of hepatobiliary disease were examined clinically, clinically chemically and partly histologically. Nineteen clinical chemical parameters were determined. Prior to pattern cognition, a principal component analysis was performed. Using six factors, accounting for 72.4% of total variance, cluster analysis was done, applying a hierarchical algorithm for ascertaining a starting partition, followed by the k-means algorithm. The validity of the solution was scrutinized, and a stable structure was found with nine clusters. Patients with a rejected suspect of liver disease were mainly located in clusters 1, 6 and 7. Cluster 1 also contains patients with compensated cirrhosis without inflammation, idiopathic hyperbilirubinaemia, focal nodular hyperplasia and haemangioma of the liver. In contrast, one third of cirrhoses, all with inflammatory activity were assigned to cluster 5. Patients with primary biliary disease were distributed among clusters 2, 3 and 4. All malignant neoplasias were assigned to cluster 9. More than 50% of fatty livers were classified to cluster 7. Cluster 2 and 8 contain only one patient with primary biliary cirrhosis (cluster 2) and fatty liver hepatitis (cluster 8). The follow-up of 66 patients also showed clinically meaningful changes of cluster assignment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","volume":"28 6","pages":"399-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.6.399","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.6.399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Diagnostic judgement is usually based on recognition of patterns. Unfortunately more than three quantitative data cannot be judged simultaneously without help of mathematical methods. Working on laboratory reports, a clinician usually goes linearly through the columns and reduces quantitative to qualitative data. Therefore the medical decision process should be improved if data reduction is performed with the aid of mathematical methods for pattern recognition. A total of 191 consecutive outpatients with a tentative or proven diagnosis of hepatobiliary disease were examined clinically, clinically chemically and partly histologically. Nineteen clinical chemical parameters were determined. Prior to pattern cognition, a principal component analysis was performed. Using six factors, accounting for 72.4% of total variance, cluster analysis was done, applying a hierarchical algorithm for ascertaining a starting partition, followed by the k-means algorithm. The validity of the solution was scrutinized, and a stable structure was found with nine clusters. Patients with a rejected suspect of liver disease were mainly located in clusters 1, 6 and 7. Cluster 1 also contains patients with compensated cirrhosis without inflammation, idiopathic hyperbilirubinaemia, focal nodular hyperplasia and haemangioma of the liver. In contrast, one third of cirrhoses, all with inflammatory activity were assigned to cluster 5. Patients with primary biliary disease were distributed among clusters 2, 3 and 4. All malignant neoplasias were assigned to cluster 9. More than 50% of fatty livers were classified to cluster 7. Cluster 2 and 8 contain only one patient with primary biliary cirrhosis (cluster 2) and fatty liver hepatitis (cluster 8). The follow-up of 66 patients also showed clinically meaningful changes of cluster assignment.

聚类分析在肝病临床化学诊断中的应用。
诊断判断通常是基于对模式的识别。不幸的是,如果没有数学方法的帮助,不能同时判断三个以上的定量数据。在处理实验室报告时,临床医生通常会线性地浏览各列,并将定量数据简化为定性数据。因此,如果借助模式识别的数学方法进行数据约简,则可以改善医疗决策过程。总共有191例连续的门诊患者,初步或证实诊断为肝胆疾病,进行临床、临床化学和部分组织学检查。测定19项临床化学参数。在模式认知之前,进行主成分分析。采用6个因子,占总方差的72.4%,进行聚类分析,采用分层算法确定起始分区,然后采用k-means算法。该解决方案的有效性进行了审查,并发现一个稳定的结构与九个簇。肝脏疾病疑似排斥患者主要集中在第1、6和7组。第1组还包括无炎症代偿性肝硬化、特发性高胆红素血症、局灶性结节增生和肝血管瘤患者。相比之下,三分之一的肝硬化,所有炎症活动被分配到第5类。原发性胆道疾病患者分布在聚类2、3和4。所有恶性肿瘤归为第9类。50%以上的脂肪肝归为第7类。第2类和第8类仅包含1例原发性胆汁性肝硬化(第2类)和脂肪肝肝炎(第8类)。对66例患者的随访也显示出具有临床意义的聚类分配变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信