An empirical study on simplification of business process modeling languages

Eric Umuhoza, M. Brambilla, Davide Ripamonti, Jordi Cabot
{"title":"An empirical study on simplification of business process modeling languages","authors":"Eric Umuhoza, M. Brambilla, Davide Ripamonti, Jordi Cabot","doi":"10.1145/2814251.2814254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adaptation, specially by means of a simplification process, of modeling languages is a common practice due to the overwhelming complexity of most standard languages (like UML or BPMN), not needed for typical usage scenarios while at the same time companies don't want to go to the extremes of defining a brand new domain specific language. Unfortunately, there is a lack of examples of such simplification experiences that can be used as a reference for future projects. In this paper we report on a field study aimed at the simplification of a business process modeling language (namely, BPMN) for making it suitable to end users. Our simplification process relies on a set of steps that encompass the selection of the language elements to simplify, generation of a set of language variants for them, measurement of effectiveness of the variants through user modeling sessions and extraction of quantitative and qualitative data for guiding the selection of the best language refinement. We describe the experimental setting, the output of the various steps of the analysis, and the results we obtained from users. Finally, we conclude with an outlook towards the generalization of the approach and consolidation of a language simplification method.","PeriodicalId":354784,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2814251.2814254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The adaptation, specially by means of a simplification process, of modeling languages is a common practice due to the overwhelming complexity of most standard languages (like UML or BPMN), not needed for typical usage scenarios while at the same time companies don't want to go to the extremes of defining a brand new domain specific language. Unfortunately, there is a lack of examples of such simplification experiences that can be used as a reference for future projects. In this paper we report on a field study aimed at the simplification of a business process modeling language (namely, BPMN) for making it suitable to end users. Our simplification process relies on a set of steps that encompass the selection of the language elements to simplify, generation of a set of language variants for them, measurement of effectiveness of the variants through user modeling sessions and extraction of quantitative and qualitative data for guiding the selection of the best language refinement. We describe the experimental setting, the output of the various steps of the analysis, and the results we obtained from users. Finally, we conclude with an outlook towards the generalization of the approach and consolidation of a language simplification method.
业务流程建模语言简化的实证研究
由于大多数标准语言(如UML或BPMN)的压倒性复杂性,对建模语言的适应(特别是通过简化过程)是一种常见的做法,对于典型的使用场景不需要,同时公司不想走到极端,定义一个全新的特定于领域的语言。不幸的是,缺乏这种简化经验的例子,可以用作未来项目的参考。在本文中,我们报告了一项旨在简化业务流程建模语言(即BPMN)以使其适合最终用户的实地研究。我们的简化过程依赖于一组步骤,这些步骤包括要简化的语言元素的选择,为它们生成一组语言变体,通过用户建模会话测量变体的有效性,以及提取定量和定性数据以指导选择最佳语言细化。我们描述了实验设置,分析的各个步骤的输出,以及我们从用户那里获得的结果。最后,对该方法的推广和语言简化方法的巩固进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信