Malaysia’s Investment Malaise: What Happened and Can It Be Fixed?

Jayant Menon
{"title":"Malaysia’s Investment Malaise: What Happened and Can It Be Fixed?","authors":"Jayant Menon","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2122184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Private investment in Malaysia has never fully recovered from the impact of the Asian financial crisis (AFC). Both domestic and foreign investment have remained lackluster post-AFC; while foreigners continue to shun Malaysia, it seems even domestic investors are fleeing as well, with Malaysia having become a net exporter of capital since 2005. The crucial questions are: what happened and can it be fixed? We argue that the investment malaise can be attributed to two interrelated factors: (i) distortions introduced by the New Economic Policy (NEP) and its reincarnates, and (ii) the widespread presence and overbearing influence of government-linked corporations (GLCs) that deter new investment. While the impacts of both factors may have been masked during the heady days leading up to the AFC, this is no longer the case in the current competitive environment where residency options for both capital and skilled labor are much greater. Fixing the problem requires addressing the distortions of the NEP and curtailing the influence of the GLCs. Although there have been a few recent moves to dilute the NEP, some of these measures have already been reversed. Similarly, while there has been an active program of divestment from GLCs, there have also been GLC acquisitions in new sectors, making it more of a diversification than a divestment program. Malaysia’s investment malaise can be fixed, but not in this way.","PeriodicalId":214141,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Emerging Asian Markets (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Emerging Asian Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2122184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Private investment in Malaysia has never fully recovered from the impact of the Asian financial crisis (AFC). Both domestic and foreign investment have remained lackluster post-AFC; while foreigners continue to shun Malaysia, it seems even domestic investors are fleeing as well, with Malaysia having become a net exporter of capital since 2005. The crucial questions are: what happened and can it be fixed? We argue that the investment malaise can be attributed to two interrelated factors: (i) distortions introduced by the New Economic Policy (NEP) and its reincarnates, and (ii) the widespread presence and overbearing influence of government-linked corporations (GLCs) that deter new investment. While the impacts of both factors may have been masked during the heady days leading up to the AFC, this is no longer the case in the current competitive environment where residency options for both capital and skilled labor are much greater. Fixing the problem requires addressing the distortions of the NEP and curtailing the influence of the GLCs. Although there have been a few recent moves to dilute the NEP, some of these measures have already been reversed. Similarly, while there has been an active program of divestment from GLCs, there have also been GLC acquisitions in new sectors, making it more of a diversification than a divestment program. Malaysia’s investment malaise can be fixed, but not in this way.
马来西亚的投资问题:发生了什么,能解决吗?
马来西亚的私人投资从未从亚洲金融危机(AFC)的影响中完全恢复。亚足联之后,无论是国内投资还是外国投资都乏善可陈;在外国人继续避开马来西亚的同时,似乎连国内投资者也在逃离。自2005年以来,马来西亚已成为资本净出口国。关键的问题是:发生了什么?它能被修复吗?我们认为,投资萎靡可归因于两个相互关联的因素:(i)新经济政策(NEP)及其化身带来的扭曲,以及(ii)与政府有关联的公司(glc)的广泛存在和霸道影响阻碍了新投资。虽然这两个因素的影响可能在亚足联之前的令人兴奋的日子里被掩盖了,但在当前竞争激烈的环境中,这种情况已经不复存在,资本和熟练劳动力的居住选择都要大得多。要解决这个问题,就需要解决新经济政策的扭曲问题,并削弱全球政府间指标的影响。尽管最近有一些削弱新经济政策的举措,但其中一些措施已经被撤销。同样地,虽然有一个积极的从GLC撤资的计划,但也有GLC在新行业的收购,使其更像是一种多元化而不是撤资计划。马来西亚的投资萎靡可以得到解决,但不是通过这种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信