Investigating the Generative Approach for Question Answering in E-Commerce

Kalyani Roy, Vineeth Balapanuru, Tapas Nayak, Pawan Goyal
{"title":"Investigating the Generative Approach for Question Answering in E-Commerce","authors":"Kalyani Roy, Vineeth Balapanuru, Tapas Nayak, Pawan Goyal","doi":"10.18653/v1/2022.ecnlp-1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many e-commerce websites provide Product-related Question Answering (PQA) platform where potential customers can ask questions related to a product, and other consumers can post an answer to that question based on their experience. Recently, there has been a growing interest in providing automated responses to product questions. In this paper, we investigate the suitability of the generative approach for PQA. We use state-of-the-art generative models proposed by Deng et al.(2020) and Lu et al.(2020) for this purpose. On closer examination, we find several drawbacks in this approach: (1) input reviews are not always utilized significantly for answer generation, (2) the performance of the models is abysmal while answering the numerical questions, (3) many of the generated answers contain phrases like “I do not know” which are taken from the reference answer in training data, and these answers do not convey any information to the customer. Although these approaches achieve a high ROUGE score, it does not reflect upon these shortcomings of the generated answers. We hope that our analysis will lead to more rigorous PQA approaches, and future research will focus on addressing these shortcomings in PQA.","PeriodicalId":384006,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The Fifth Workshop on e-Commerce and NLP (ECNLP 5)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The Fifth Workshop on e-Commerce and NLP (ECNLP 5)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.ecnlp-1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many e-commerce websites provide Product-related Question Answering (PQA) platform where potential customers can ask questions related to a product, and other consumers can post an answer to that question based on their experience. Recently, there has been a growing interest in providing automated responses to product questions. In this paper, we investigate the suitability of the generative approach for PQA. We use state-of-the-art generative models proposed by Deng et al.(2020) and Lu et al.(2020) for this purpose. On closer examination, we find several drawbacks in this approach: (1) input reviews are not always utilized significantly for answer generation, (2) the performance of the models is abysmal while answering the numerical questions, (3) many of the generated answers contain phrases like “I do not know” which are taken from the reference answer in training data, and these answers do not convey any information to the customer. Although these approaches achieve a high ROUGE score, it does not reflect upon these shortcomings of the generated answers. We hope that our analysis will lead to more rigorous PQA approaches, and future research will focus on addressing these shortcomings in PQA.
电子商务中生成式问答方法研究
许多电子商务网站提供与产品相关的问题回答(PQA)平台,潜在客户可以提出与产品相关的问题,其他消费者可以根据他们的经验发布该问题的答案。最近,人们对为产品问题提供自动响应越来越感兴趣。在本文中,我们研究了生成方法对PQA的适用性。为此,我们使用了Deng等人(2020)和Lu等人(2020)提出的最先进的生成模型。仔细检查后,我们发现这种方法有几个缺点:(1)输入审查并不总是用于答案生成,(2)模型在回答数值问题时的性能非常糟糕,(3)许多生成的答案包含“我不知道”这样的短语,这些短语取自训练数据中的参考答案,并且这些答案没有向客户传达任何信息。虽然这些方法获得了很高的ROUGE分数,但它并没有反映出生成答案的这些缺点。我们希望我们的分析将导致更严格的PQA方法,未来的研究将集中在解决PQA中的这些缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信