EMERGENT LIBERAL JUDAISM AND LILY MONTAGU’S PROTO-FEMINIST PROJECT: EXPLORING THE PRECURSIVE AND CONCEPTUAL LINKS WITH SECOND AND THIRD-WAVE JEWISH FEMINIST THEOLOGIES

Luke Devine
{"title":"EMERGENT LIBERAL JUDAISM AND LILY MONTAGU’S PROTO-FEMINIST PROJECT: EXPLORING THE PRECURSIVE AND CONCEPTUAL LINKS WITH SECOND AND THIRD-WAVE JEWISH FEMINIST THEOLOGIES","authors":"Luke Devine","doi":"10.31826/mjj-2013-090102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lily Montagu was the founder of Liberal Judaism in England. Because of Montagu’s groundbreaking proto-feminist efforts women in Liberal Judaism can become rabbis, be called up to read the Torah, they are equal in divorce law, they can study the sacred texts, they can form a minyan, and can assume communal and religious positions of authority over men. Montagu was an author, theologian, and social worker; she was the driving force behind the development of Liberal Judaism. However, this biographical overview does not match up with the extant historiography that has instead preferred to focus on the male leaders of the Liberal movement to the extent that Montagu’s intellectual and theological contribution has been marginalized and even completely ignored. In this paper we will siècle Anglo-Jewry that would otherwise be forgotten; even more, we will see in Montagu’s essays, monographs, and novels some of the English foundations of contemporary Jewish feminist theology. In the process, the biography and memory of Lily Montagu will be restored to its rightful place. Lily Montagu was the founder of Anglo-Liberal Judaism, but the extant scholarship has not been forthcoming in acknowledging the extent of her role in the expansion of the movement. In fact, Montagu’s part in the formation and development of Liberal Judaism into an established denomination, and her contribution to the intellectual, spiritual, and theological underpinnings of the movement, have been marginalized, downplayed, and even ignored, with analyses of her involvement even bordering on the derogatory. However, the historiographical picture does not marry up with the primary sources, including Montagu’s innumerable speeches, lectures, prayers, and services to the Liberal congregation, and her countless monographs, novels, sermons, essays, letters, liturgies, and papers for Liberal Jewish Monthly, the Jewish Quarterly Review, and as part of the Papers for Jewish People series. Instead Anglo-Jewish historiography, with few exceptions, has preferred to focus on Claude years. Importantly, Montagu not only challenged contemporaneous Jewish stereotypes tradition along proto-feminist lines to develop religious praxis, liturgical, and theological discursive that is more resonant of Second-Wave Jewish feminism than it is of earlytwentieth-century, First-Wave feminist discourse.1 This is important as the Montagu corpus * Lecturer at University of Worcester. Email: l.devine@worc.ac.uk 1 By First-Wave feminism I refer to the period of activism between 1792 and 1918 (other scholars will differ) that resulted in women gaining the franchise in 1918 in England. Alternatively, the locus of Second-Wave Jewish 2 MELILAH MANCHESTER JOURNAL OF JEWISH STUDIES reveals an Anglo-Jewish forerunner to the Second and Third-Waves of feminist activism. In this paper we will explore the links between the stages. Indeed, by examining the feminist elements of Montagu’s own understanding of Liberal theology, particularly in the immanent experience of the divine presence, we will draw out some of the spiritual and conceptual links with contemporary Jewish feminist theology. In the process, we will see not only another element to the gendered history of Anglo-Jewish emancipation, acculturation, and religious through the analysis of rarely seen literary works by Lily Montagu, some of the precursory and theoretical foundations of current feminist exposition on the divine.2 Lily Montagu was born December 22, 1873 into the upper-class, Anglo-Jewish Montagu family. Despite the family’s wealth, and their acculturation, Lily’s father, Samuel Montagu, was intent that the household remain strictly Orthodox. But Lily was never convinced; although she enjoyed the observances and the festivals she was concerned that attention to ritual, or ritual for ritual’s sake, was usurping spiritual intention (kavanah). Montagu could not relate any type of spiritual experience with these festivals; they seemed vacuous. Years later, she confessed in retrospect: I was not conscious of any personal spiritual experience stimulated by the Sabbaths and festivals, but I could become very enthusiastic over the symbols, and if asked, should have unhesitatingly said that their preservation was required by God. . . . experiences connected with Passover . . . I remember rushing up to my eldest brother . . . and expostulating. “I feel ashamed,” I said, “at the behavior of many of the people. How dare they think they are praying? If that is religion, I hate it.”3 But this is not to say that Montagu did not appreciate the importance of rituals and observances; she would later recall: “I adhered to my Liberal Jewish point of view that ceremonials which are aids to holiness, which, in fact, assist ordinary people to render which, alas, has usurped the place of life-giving religion, I felt to be acceptable.”4 Montagu complained that the Orthodox services were inadequate as the prayers were in Hebrew and incomprehensible and she felt peripheral as a woman being sequestered to the gallery, feminism was in the United States and began in the 1970s. The multi-denominational emphasis of the loosely Conservative movement. Jewish feminists were seeking women’s equal access to all aspects of Jewish communal and inequality in family halakhot (laws), the removal of the mechitza curtain that separates the sexes in the synagogue, and the inclusion of women in the all male minyan (prayer group). Reform feminists complained that women were not being called up to read the Torah, while Orthodox feminists questioned the exclusion of women from the study of the sacred texts as well as the legal restrictions on women initiating divorce. With regard to theology, the Reconstructionist movement was integral, and continues to be, particularly in its rejection of classical theology, halakhah (law), hierarchy, and Jewish particularity, and in its humanism (Luke Devine, Second-Wave Jewish Feminism, 1971–1991: Foundational Theology and Sacral Discourse (Piscataway: Gorgias Press, 2011), 19–20). In general, the Second-Wave was a drive for gender inclusionism, in one way or another, across the Jewish denominations. 2 See Luke Devine, From Anglo-First-Wave Towards American Second-Wave Jewish Feminism: Negotiating with Jewish Feminist Theology and its Communities in the Writing of Amy Levy (Piscataway: Gorgias Press, 2010) and Ann Heilmann, New Woman Fiction: Women Writing First Wave Feminism . 3 Lily Montagu, The Faith of a Jewish Woman (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1943), 8–9. 4 Lily Montagu, My Club and I: The Story of the West Central Jewish Club (London: Herbert Joseph Limited, 1941), 43. EMERGENT LIBERAL JUDAISM AND LILY MONTAGU’S PROJECT (LUKE DEVINE) 3 among other discriminatory gender differentiations. Believing that Orthodoxy was denying both her intellectual self-expression and the development of her inner-spirituality, Montagu the authority of her father and his uncompromising Orthodoxy and the restrictions on her personal liberty.5 As a young adult, Montagu was troubled by her family’s unthinking acceptance of halakhah: “We did not rebel. We believed that we were acting as Jews must, and there was no court of appeal against the strict laws. There was no question of degree. All the regulations were part of the fence, built up to defend the Divine laws as given to Moses, and we accepted them.”6 It was the Reverend Simeon Singer, the Minister of the New West End Synagogue, who Montagu credited with awakening her to the Hebrew prophets and to the importance of religion.7 Singer encouraged her to ask questions that would not have been countenanced by her father. According to Montagu they discussed the prophets at length and she gradually became infused with prophetic concerns for social justice. Nellie Levy describes the sense of moral mission that became central to Montagu’s life: A young girl dreamed and behold a vision appeared and she saw her sisters, and they lacked much that had been bestowed on her, some needed guidance and friendship, some to be lighted out of squalor and shown the light; some seemed mere children forced to become breadwinners; some ran to and fro to snatch at pleasures that were transitory and left bitterness and disillusionment; some cried “Give us opportunities denied us, we too need light, space, knowledge”; others sat and waited to enter the world of literature and art, and again, others feared to tread, for the path seemed strewn with giants, who could be overcome only by strength which they lacked, and still others groped towards those frailer than themselves and longed to hold out a helping hand but knew not how. . . . “To this vision I [Montagu] consecrate myself, and its fruition I will labor unceasingly. I will break down barriers, establish friendships and give opportunities. I will share, bind up those who are broken, and I will set before them light and good through a Faith in Judaism, so that they have strength wherewith to live.”8 religion. She became convinced that her role was to bring social “amelioration”; she was determined to help those less fortunate than herself, particularly in London’s socially disadvantaged East End Jewish community.9 For Montagu, it was God’s will that social justice would prevail over inequality: I was deeply shocked by the inequalities which prevailed in large cities, the terrible injustice which allowed me to have such an easy, happy, protected girlhood while there was, in some districts, a monotony of misery. But I felt convinced that God did not desire such injustice to continue. My faith in His righteousness was never affected, but I was worried by the apparent inability of God to stem the tide of injustice. I was convinced that man, with God’s help, could set things right if he wished to, but how was he to be made to realise his obligations?10 5 Eric Conrad, Lily H. Montagu: Prophet of A Living Judaism (New York: National Federation of Temple Sisterhoods, 1953), 35–36. Se","PeriodicalId":305040,"journal":{"name":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2013-090102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lily Montagu was the founder of Liberal Judaism in England. Because of Montagu’s groundbreaking proto-feminist efforts women in Liberal Judaism can become rabbis, be called up to read the Torah, they are equal in divorce law, they can study the sacred texts, they can form a minyan, and can assume communal and religious positions of authority over men. Montagu was an author, theologian, and social worker; she was the driving force behind the development of Liberal Judaism. However, this biographical overview does not match up with the extant historiography that has instead preferred to focus on the male leaders of the Liberal movement to the extent that Montagu’s intellectual and theological contribution has been marginalized and even completely ignored. In this paper we will siècle Anglo-Jewry that would otherwise be forgotten; even more, we will see in Montagu’s essays, monographs, and novels some of the English foundations of contemporary Jewish feminist theology. In the process, the biography and memory of Lily Montagu will be restored to its rightful place. Lily Montagu was the founder of Anglo-Liberal Judaism, but the extant scholarship has not been forthcoming in acknowledging the extent of her role in the expansion of the movement. In fact, Montagu’s part in the formation and development of Liberal Judaism into an established denomination, and her contribution to the intellectual, spiritual, and theological underpinnings of the movement, have been marginalized, downplayed, and even ignored, with analyses of her involvement even bordering on the derogatory. However, the historiographical picture does not marry up with the primary sources, including Montagu’s innumerable speeches, lectures, prayers, and services to the Liberal congregation, and her countless monographs, novels, sermons, essays, letters, liturgies, and papers for Liberal Jewish Monthly, the Jewish Quarterly Review, and as part of the Papers for Jewish People series. Instead Anglo-Jewish historiography, with few exceptions, has preferred to focus on Claude years. Importantly, Montagu not only challenged contemporaneous Jewish stereotypes tradition along proto-feminist lines to develop religious praxis, liturgical, and theological discursive that is more resonant of Second-Wave Jewish feminism than it is of earlytwentieth-century, First-Wave feminist discourse.1 This is important as the Montagu corpus * Lecturer at University of Worcester. Email: l.devine@worc.ac.uk 1 By First-Wave feminism I refer to the period of activism between 1792 and 1918 (other scholars will differ) that resulted in women gaining the franchise in 1918 in England. Alternatively, the locus of Second-Wave Jewish 2 MELILAH MANCHESTER JOURNAL OF JEWISH STUDIES reveals an Anglo-Jewish forerunner to the Second and Third-Waves of feminist activism. In this paper we will explore the links between the stages. Indeed, by examining the feminist elements of Montagu’s own understanding of Liberal theology, particularly in the immanent experience of the divine presence, we will draw out some of the spiritual and conceptual links with contemporary Jewish feminist theology. In the process, we will see not only another element to the gendered history of Anglo-Jewish emancipation, acculturation, and religious through the analysis of rarely seen literary works by Lily Montagu, some of the precursory and theoretical foundations of current feminist exposition on the divine.2 Lily Montagu was born December 22, 1873 into the upper-class, Anglo-Jewish Montagu family. Despite the family’s wealth, and their acculturation, Lily’s father, Samuel Montagu, was intent that the household remain strictly Orthodox. But Lily was never convinced; although she enjoyed the observances and the festivals she was concerned that attention to ritual, or ritual for ritual’s sake, was usurping spiritual intention (kavanah). Montagu could not relate any type of spiritual experience with these festivals; they seemed vacuous. Years later, she confessed in retrospect: I was not conscious of any personal spiritual experience stimulated by the Sabbaths and festivals, but I could become very enthusiastic over the symbols, and if asked, should have unhesitatingly said that their preservation was required by God. . . . experiences connected with Passover . . . I remember rushing up to my eldest brother . . . and expostulating. “I feel ashamed,” I said, “at the behavior of many of the people. How dare they think they are praying? If that is religion, I hate it.”3 But this is not to say that Montagu did not appreciate the importance of rituals and observances; she would later recall: “I adhered to my Liberal Jewish point of view that ceremonials which are aids to holiness, which, in fact, assist ordinary people to render which, alas, has usurped the place of life-giving religion, I felt to be acceptable.”4 Montagu complained that the Orthodox services were inadequate as the prayers were in Hebrew and incomprehensible and she felt peripheral as a woman being sequestered to the gallery, feminism was in the United States and began in the 1970s. The multi-denominational emphasis of the loosely Conservative movement. Jewish feminists were seeking women’s equal access to all aspects of Jewish communal and inequality in family halakhot (laws), the removal of the mechitza curtain that separates the sexes in the synagogue, and the inclusion of women in the all male minyan (prayer group). Reform feminists complained that women were not being called up to read the Torah, while Orthodox feminists questioned the exclusion of women from the study of the sacred texts as well as the legal restrictions on women initiating divorce. With regard to theology, the Reconstructionist movement was integral, and continues to be, particularly in its rejection of classical theology, halakhah (law), hierarchy, and Jewish particularity, and in its humanism (Luke Devine, Second-Wave Jewish Feminism, 1971–1991: Foundational Theology and Sacral Discourse (Piscataway: Gorgias Press, 2011), 19–20). In general, the Second-Wave was a drive for gender inclusionism, in one way or another, across the Jewish denominations. 2 See Luke Devine, From Anglo-First-Wave Towards American Second-Wave Jewish Feminism: Negotiating with Jewish Feminist Theology and its Communities in the Writing of Amy Levy (Piscataway: Gorgias Press, 2010) and Ann Heilmann, New Woman Fiction: Women Writing First Wave Feminism . 3 Lily Montagu, The Faith of a Jewish Woman (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1943), 8–9. 4 Lily Montagu, My Club and I: The Story of the West Central Jewish Club (London: Herbert Joseph Limited, 1941), 43. EMERGENT LIBERAL JUDAISM AND LILY MONTAGU’S PROJECT (LUKE DEVINE) 3 among other discriminatory gender differentiations. Believing that Orthodoxy was denying both her intellectual self-expression and the development of her inner-spirituality, Montagu the authority of her father and his uncompromising Orthodoxy and the restrictions on her personal liberty.5 As a young adult, Montagu was troubled by her family’s unthinking acceptance of halakhah: “We did not rebel. We believed that we were acting as Jews must, and there was no court of appeal against the strict laws. There was no question of degree. All the regulations were part of the fence, built up to defend the Divine laws as given to Moses, and we accepted them.”6 It was the Reverend Simeon Singer, the Minister of the New West End Synagogue, who Montagu credited with awakening her to the Hebrew prophets and to the importance of religion.7 Singer encouraged her to ask questions that would not have been countenanced by her father. According to Montagu they discussed the prophets at length and she gradually became infused with prophetic concerns for social justice. Nellie Levy describes the sense of moral mission that became central to Montagu’s life: A young girl dreamed and behold a vision appeared and she saw her sisters, and they lacked much that had been bestowed on her, some needed guidance and friendship, some to be lighted out of squalor and shown the light; some seemed mere children forced to become breadwinners; some ran to and fro to snatch at pleasures that were transitory and left bitterness and disillusionment; some cried “Give us opportunities denied us, we too need light, space, knowledge”; others sat and waited to enter the world of literature and art, and again, others feared to tread, for the path seemed strewn with giants, who could be overcome only by strength which they lacked, and still others groped towards those frailer than themselves and longed to hold out a helping hand but knew not how. . . . “To this vision I [Montagu] consecrate myself, and its fruition I will labor unceasingly. I will break down barriers, establish friendships and give opportunities. I will share, bind up those who are broken, and I will set before them light and good through a Faith in Judaism, so that they have strength wherewith to live.”8 religion. She became convinced that her role was to bring social “amelioration”; she was determined to help those less fortunate than herself, particularly in London’s socially disadvantaged East End Jewish community.9 For Montagu, it was God’s will that social justice would prevail over inequality: I was deeply shocked by the inequalities which prevailed in large cities, the terrible injustice which allowed me to have such an easy, happy, protected girlhood while there was, in some districts, a monotony of misery. But I felt convinced that God did not desire such injustice to continue. My faith in His righteousness was never affected, but I was worried by the apparent inability of God to stem the tide of injustice. I was convinced that man, with God’s help, could set things right if he wished to, but how was he to be made to realise his obligations?10 5 Eric Conrad, Lily H. Montagu: Prophet of A Living Judaism (New York: National Federation of Temple Sisterhoods, 1953), 35–36. Se
新兴的自由犹太教和莉莉·蒙塔古的原始女权主义计划:探索与第二波和第三波犹太女权主义神学的先驱性和概念性联系
莉莉·蒙塔古是英国自由犹太教的创始人。由于蒙塔古开创性的原始女权主义的努力,自由犹太教的女性可以成为拉比,被召唤去读Torah,她们在离婚法上是平等的,她们可以研究神圣的文本,她们可以组成minyan,并且可以承担比男性更权威的公共和宗教职位。蒙塔古是一位作家、神学家和社会工作者;她是自由犹太教发展的推动力量。然而,这种传记式的概述与现存的史学并不相符,后者更倾向于关注自由主义运动的男性领导人,以至于蒙塔古的思想和神学贡献被边缘化,甚至完全被忽视。在本文中,我们将讨论盎格鲁犹太人,否则他们将被遗忘;更重要的是,我们将在蒙塔古的散文,专著和小说中看到当代犹太女性主义神学的一些英国基础。在这个过程中,莉莉·蒙塔古的传记和记忆将恢复到应有的位置。莉莉·蒙塔古(Lily Montagu)是盎格鲁-自由犹太教的创始人,但现存的学术并没有承认她在这场运动的扩张中所起的作用。事实上,蒙塔古在自由犹太教的形成和发展过程中所扮演的角色,以及她对该运动的知识、精神和神学基础的贡献,都被边缘化、低估,甚至被忽视,对她的参与的分析甚至近乎贬损。然而,史学上的描述并没有与原始资料相结合,包括蒙塔古无数的演讲、演讲、祈祷和对自由派会众的服务,以及她无数的专著、小说、布道、散文、信件、礼拜仪式,以及《自由犹太月刊》、《犹太季刊评论》和《犹太人论文》系列的论文。相反,除了少数例外,盎格鲁-犹太史学更倾向于关注克劳德时期。重要的是,蒙塔古不仅挑战了当时犹太人的刻板印象,沿着原始女权主义的路线发展了宗教实践、礼拜仪式和神学话语,这些话语比20世纪早期的第一波女权主义话语更能引起第二波犹太女权主义的共鸣作为伍斯特大学的蒙塔古语料库讲师,这一点很重要。电子邮件:l.devine@worc.ac.uk我所说的第一波女权主义指的是1792年至1918年(其他学者会有不同看法)之间的激进主义时期,这一时期导致1918年英国女性获得了选举权。另一方面,《第二波犹太人》的发源地梅利拉(《曼彻斯特犹太研究杂志》)揭示了盎格鲁犹太人是女权主义运动第二波和第三波的先驱。在本文中,我们将探讨这些阶段之间的联系。事实上,通过考察蒙塔古自己对自由主义神学的理解中的女权主义元素,特别是在神圣存在的内在体验中,我们将得出一些与当代犹太女权主义神学在精神和概念上的联系。在此过程中,我们将通过对莉莉·蒙塔古罕见的文学作品的分析,不仅看到盎格鲁-犹太人的解放、文化适应和宗教性别化历史的另一个因素,也看到当前女性主义对神性的阐述的一些先兆和理论基础莉莉·蒙塔古于1873年12月22日出生在上流社会的盎格鲁犹太人蒙塔古家族。尽管家境富裕,文化也很适应,莉莉的父亲塞缪尔·蒙塔古(Samuel Montagu)还是希望这个家庭保持严格的东正教。但是莉莉从来没有被说服过;虽然她喜欢仪式和节日,但她担心对仪式的关注,或为仪式而仪式,正在篡夺精神意图(kavanah)。蒙塔古无法将任何类型的精神体验与这些节日联系起来;它们看起来很空洞。多年以后,她在回忆中承认:我没有意识到安息日和节日刺激了我的任何个人精神体验,但我可以对这些符号非常热情,如果被问到,我应该毫不犹豫地说,它们的保存是上帝要求的. . . .与逾越节有关的经历…我记得我冲向我的大哥…和劝解。“我为许多人的行为感到羞愧,”我说。他们怎么敢认为自己在祈祷?如果那是宗教,我讨厌它。但这并不是说蒙塔古不欣赏仪式和仪式的重要性;她后来回忆道:“我坚持我的自由主义犹太人的观点,即仪式是神圣的辅助,事实上,它帮助普通人实现,唉,它篡夺了赋予生命的宗教的地位,我觉得这是可以接受的。 我相信,人在上帝的帮助下,只要他愿意,就能把事情纠正过来,但怎样才能使他履行自己的义务呢?10 5埃里克·康拉德,莉莉·h·蒙塔古:活的犹太教的先知(纽约:全国圣殿姐妹会联合会,1953),35-36页。Se
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信