Application possibilities of survival analysis for time-to-event data in animal science

B. Bárdos, Ildikó Benedek, O. Kodak, Nagy István
{"title":"Application possibilities of survival analysis for time-to-event data in animal science","authors":"B. Bárdos, Ildikó Benedek, O. Kodak, Nagy István","doi":"10.31914/aak.2837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application efficiency of several statistical methods was tested based on an open field behavior test of mice. The examined trait was the duration time until the animals approached the experimenter’s hand. The available time was fixed in 300 seconds. There were monitored 80 mice belonging to two different species of the Mus genus in equal proportion. Besides, male and female and young and adult animals have also represented the evaluated groups in equal proportions. The data of the examined trait was analyzed with Generalized Linear Models, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and with Cox Proportional hazard model. The applied statistical procedure provided completely discordant results. According to the GLM results none of the examined factors (species, sex, and age) had significant effects on the examined variable. On the contrary, all factors proved to be significant using a procedure based on the survival analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated a higher proportion of individuals successfully approaching the experimenter’s hand in all of the compared groups representing different species sexes and ages, respectively. The estimated Cox regression coefficients were significant indicating the significant effects of the species, sex, and age on the investigated trait. Based on the estimated Hazard ratios the probability that in the next time unit a successful approach of the experimenter’s hand would occur is three times more likely for one species than the other, twice as much for males and the juveniles than for the females and for the adults. Based on the present study it could be concluded that the successful approach of the experimenter’s hand by the mice is clearly “time to event data” thus it is suitable to be analyzed with survival analysis procedures. It could be concluded that applying conventional GLM was not adequate because due to the lack of the successful approach and approach times the censored data should not be used and thus the sample size would largely be reduced.","PeriodicalId":403816,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.2837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application efficiency of several statistical methods was tested based on an open field behavior test of mice. The examined trait was the duration time until the animals approached the experimenter’s hand. The available time was fixed in 300 seconds. There were monitored 80 mice belonging to two different species of the Mus genus in equal proportion. Besides, male and female and young and adult animals have also represented the evaluated groups in equal proportions. The data of the examined trait was analyzed with Generalized Linear Models, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and with Cox Proportional hazard model. The applied statistical procedure provided completely discordant results. According to the GLM results none of the examined factors (species, sex, and age) had significant effects on the examined variable. On the contrary, all factors proved to be significant using a procedure based on the survival analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated a higher proportion of individuals successfully approaching the experimenter’s hand in all of the compared groups representing different species sexes and ages, respectively. The estimated Cox regression coefficients were significant indicating the significant effects of the species, sex, and age on the investigated trait. Based on the estimated Hazard ratios the probability that in the next time unit a successful approach of the experimenter’s hand would occur is three times more likely for one species than the other, twice as much for males and the juveniles than for the females and for the adults. Based on the present study it could be concluded that the successful approach of the experimenter’s hand by the mice is clearly “time to event data” thus it is suitable to be analyzed with survival analysis procedures. It could be concluded that applying conventional GLM was not adequate because due to the lack of the successful approach and approach times the censored data should not be used and thus the sample size would largely be reduced.
生存分析对事件时间数据在动物科学中的应用可能性
在野外小鼠行为学实验的基础上,对几种统计方法的应用效率进行了检验。测试的特征是动物接近实验者的手的持续时间。可用时间固定为300秒。监测鼠属两种鼠各80只,各占相同比例。此外,雄性和雌性、幼年和成年动物也以相同的比例代表了被评估的群体。采用广义线性模型(Generalized Linear Models)、Kaplan-Meier生存曲线(Kaplan-Meier survival curves)和Cox比例风险模型(Cox Proportional hazard model)对各性状进行分析。应用的统计程序提供了完全不一致的结果。根据GLM的结果,没有一个被检查的因素(物种、性别和年龄)对被检查的变量有显著的影响。相反,使用基于生存分析的程序证明所有因素都是显著的。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,在代表不同物种、性别和年龄的所有比较组中,成功接近实验者手的个体比例更高。估计的Cox回归系数显著,表明物种、性别和年龄对所研究性状有显著影响。根据估计的危险比,在下一个时间单位内,一个物种成功接近实验者的可能性是另一个物种的三倍,雄性和幼崽是雌性和成年的两倍。根据目前的研究可以得出结论,小鼠成功接近实验者的手明显是“事件时间数据”,因此适合用生存分析程序进行分析。可以得出结论,应用传统的GLM是不够的,因为由于缺乏成功的方法和方法时间,不应该使用经过审查的数据,因此样本量将大大减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信