Is that food RTE?

E. Derby
{"title":"Is that food RTE?","authors":"E. Derby","doi":"10.47339/ephj.2019.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nBackground: Rates of foodborne illness linked to consumers misinterpreting, or lack of proper cooking instructions on frozen food products continue to rise. With many recalls and outbreaks in the recent years surrounding frozen breaded chicken (FBC) products due to consumers not adequately cooking products and in turn becoming ill. However, it is not just frozen breaded chicken to blame, frozen microwavable entrees have also contributed to this problem. Therefore, the purpose of this project was to determine what was actually being displayed on the packaging of these frozen foods. Identifying whether or not frozen food products have clear, specific and consistent cooking instructions for the consumers is critical in identifying the risk of cooking and eating these foods. Methods: Secondary data was obtained from the British Columbia Centers for Disease Control (BCCDC) of cooking instructions on FBC packaging, and primary data was collected through visiting grocery stores in the Metro Vancouver area by surveying cooking instructions on frozen microwavable entrees packaging. Four categories of data were assessed, 2008 and 2018 raw FBC products, 2018 cooked FBC, and 2019 frozen microwavable entrees. Parameters such as inclusion of internal cooking temperature, thermometer usage, microwave instructions, and additional food safety handling was gathered. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the results with the statistical software NCSS12. Results: Of all categories surveyed 87.1% (n=122) said to cook the product to a minimum of 74°C, and 12.9% (n=18) did not state anything. 2018 raw FBC always stated an internal cooking temperature (100%), whereas 58% of the 2008 raw FBC stated an internal temperature and 89% of both the 2019 frozen entrees and 2018 cooked FBC did. Out of all 140 products surveyed across categories only 8% stated to use a thermometer when cooking to ensure food has reached proper internal temperature. The frequency of categories to display food safety was as follows, the 2018 raw FBC (82%) and the 2008 raw FBC (79%), followed by the 2019 frozen entrees (42%) and the 2018 cooked FBC (21%). For the microwave instructions the frozen entrees almost always stated this (81%), whereas the 2008 and 2018 raw FBC both never stated to use a microwave (0%). There was a significant association between products and the inclusion of the statement of internal cooking temperature and thermometer usage. This was based on the food product category itself, frozen breaded chicken or frozen entrees, or based on manufacturer of the product. Conclusions: It was evident that the major gap lies in the consistency of instructions. Almost every manufacturer had their cooking instructions presented differently, which could in turn confuse the consumer. Instructions also rarely stated to use a thermometer to check the internal temperature, although almost always stated a specific temperature to cook to. A small portion of manufactures are diligent about displaying all necessary information to the consumer such as, Kraft, Conagra foods, and Olymel which adequately met all parameters assessed. In order to fix the gaps of inconsistency of instructions this information can be used as educational tools by the BCCDC to inform customers on what to look for in cooking instructions of frozen \n ","PeriodicalId":433101,"journal":{"name":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47339/ephj.2019.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  Background: Rates of foodborne illness linked to consumers misinterpreting, or lack of proper cooking instructions on frozen food products continue to rise. With many recalls and outbreaks in the recent years surrounding frozen breaded chicken (FBC) products due to consumers not adequately cooking products and in turn becoming ill. However, it is not just frozen breaded chicken to blame, frozen microwavable entrees have also contributed to this problem. Therefore, the purpose of this project was to determine what was actually being displayed on the packaging of these frozen foods. Identifying whether or not frozen food products have clear, specific and consistent cooking instructions for the consumers is critical in identifying the risk of cooking and eating these foods. Methods: Secondary data was obtained from the British Columbia Centers for Disease Control (BCCDC) of cooking instructions on FBC packaging, and primary data was collected through visiting grocery stores in the Metro Vancouver area by surveying cooking instructions on frozen microwavable entrees packaging. Four categories of data were assessed, 2008 and 2018 raw FBC products, 2018 cooked FBC, and 2019 frozen microwavable entrees. Parameters such as inclusion of internal cooking temperature, thermometer usage, microwave instructions, and additional food safety handling was gathered. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the results with the statistical software NCSS12. Results: Of all categories surveyed 87.1% (n=122) said to cook the product to a minimum of 74°C, and 12.9% (n=18) did not state anything. 2018 raw FBC always stated an internal cooking temperature (100%), whereas 58% of the 2008 raw FBC stated an internal temperature and 89% of both the 2019 frozen entrees and 2018 cooked FBC did. Out of all 140 products surveyed across categories only 8% stated to use a thermometer when cooking to ensure food has reached proper internal temperature. The frequency of categories to display food safety was as follows, the 2018 raw FBC (82%) and the 2008 raw FBC (79%), followed by the 2019 frozen entrees (42%) and the 2018 cooked FBC (21%). For the microwave instructions the frozen entrees almost always stated this (81%), whereas the 2008 and 2018 raw FBC both never stated to use a microwave (0%). There was a significant association between products and the inclusion of the statement of internal cooking temperature and thermometer usage. This was based on the food product category itself, frozen breaded chicken or frozen entrees, or based on manufacturer of the product. Conclusions: It was evident that the major gap lies in the consistency of instructions. Almost every manufacturer had their cooking instructions presented differently, which could in turn confuse the consumer. Instructions also rarely stated to use a thermometer to check the internal temperature, although almost always stated a specific temperature to cook to. A small portion of manufactures are diligent about displaying all necessary information to the consumer such as, Kraft, Conagra foods, and Olymel which adequately met all parameters assessed. In order to fix the gaps of inconsistency of instructions this information can be used as educational tools by the BCCDC to inform customers on what to look for in cooking instructions of frozen  
那是食物RTE吗?
背景:食源性疾病的发生率与消费者误解或缺乏适当的冷冻食品烹饪说明有关。近年来,由于消费者没有充分烹饪产品而导致生病,冷冻面包屑鸡(FBC)产品多次召回和爆发。然而,这不仅仅是冷冻面包屑鸡的问题,冷冻的微波主菜也造成了这个问题。因此,这个项目的目的是确定这些冷冻食品的包装上实际显示的是什么。确定冷冻食品是否为消费者提供了清晰、具体和一致的烹饪说明,对于确定烹饪和食用这些食品的风险至关重要。方法:从不列颠哥伦比亚省疾病控制中心(BCCDC)获得FBC包装上的烹饪说明的二次资料,并通过访问大温哥华地区的杂货店调查冷冻微波主菜包装上的烹饪说明收集第一手资料。评估了四类数据:2008年和2018年的生FBC产品、2018年的熟FBC和2019年的冷冻微波主菜。收集了内部烹饪温度、温度计使用、微波说明和其他食品安全处理等参数。采用统计软件NCSS12进行卡方检验。结果:在所有被调查的类别中,87.1% (n=122)表示将产品烹饪至至少74°C, 12.9% (n=18)没有说明任何事情。2018年的生FBC总是表示内部烹饪温度(100%),而2008年的生FBC中有58%表示内部温度,2019年的冷冻主菜和2018年的熟FBC中有89%表示内部温度。在调查的140种产品中,只有8%的产品表示在烹饪时使用温度计以确保食物达到适当的内部温度。显示食品安全的类别频率如下,2018年生的FBC(82%)和2008年生的FBC(79%),其次是2019年的冷冻主菜(42%)和2018年煮熟的FBC(21%)。对于微波炉的使用说明,冷冻主菜几乎总是这样说的(81%),而2008年和2018年的生FBC都从未说过要使用微波炉(0%)。产品与包含内部烹饪温度和温度计使用的声明之间存在显着关联。这是基于食品类别本身,冷冻面包屑鸡或冷冻主菜,或基于产品的制造商。结论:明显的差距主要在于说明书的一致性。几乎每个制造商的烹饪说明都不一样,这反过来又会让消费者感到困惑。说明书上也很少说要用温度计来检查内部温度,尽管几乎总是说要达到一个特定的烹饪温度。有一小部分的制造商很努力地向消费者展示所有必要的信息,如卡夫、康尼格拉食品和奥利梅尔,它们充分满足了所有评估的参数。为了解决说明不一致的问题,BCCDC可以将这些信息作为教育工具,告知客户在冷冻食品的烹饪说明中需要注意什么
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信