PCA vs low resolution images in face verification

C. Conde, Antonio Ruiz, E. Cabello
{"title":"PCA vs low resolution images in face verification","authors":"C. Conde, Antonio Ruiz, E. Cabello","doi":"10.1109/ICIAP.2003.1234026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Principal components analysis (PCA) has been one of the most applied methods for face verification using only 2D information, in fact, PCA is practically the method of choice for face verification applications in the real-world. An alternative method to reduce the problem dimension is working with low resolution images. In our experiments, three classifiers have been considered to compare the results achieved using PCA versus the results obtained using low resolution images. An initial set of located faces has been used for PCA matrix computation and for training all classifiers. The images belonging to the testing set were chosen to be different from the training ones. Classifiers considered are k-nearest neighbours (KNN), radial basis function (RBF) artificial neural networks, and support vector machine (SVM). Results show that SVM always achieves better results than the other classifiers. With SVM, correct verification difference between PCA and low resolution processing is only 0.13% (99.52% against 99.39%).","PeriodicalId":218076,"journal":{"name":"12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, 2003.Proceedings.","volume":"53 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, 2003.Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAP.2003.1234026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Principal components analysis (PCA) has been one of the most applied methods for face verification using only 2D information, in fact, PCA is practically the method of choice for face verification applications in the real-world. An alternative method to reduce the problem dimension is working with low resolution images. In our experiments, three classifiers have been considered to compare the results achieved using PCA versus the results obtained using low resolution images. An initial set of located faces has been used for PCA matrix computation and for training all classifiers. The images belonging to the testing set were chosen to be different from the training ones. Classifiers considered are k-nearest neighbours (KNN), radial basis function (RBF) artificial neural networks, and support vector machine (SVM). Results show that SVM always achieves better results than the other classifiers. With SVM, correct verification difference between PCA and low resolution processing is only 0.13% (99.52% against 99.39%).
PCA与低分辨率图像的人脸验证
主成分分析(PCA)一直是应用最广泛的二维信息人脸验证方法之一,实际上,主成分分析是现实世界中人脸验证应用的首选方法。降低问题维数的另一种方法是处理低分辨率图像。在我们的实验中,考虑了三种分类器来比较使用PCA获得的结果与使用低分辨率图像获得的结果。一组初始的定位面被用于主成分分析矩阵计算和训练所有分类器。选择属于测试集的图像与训练集的图像不同。考虑的分类器有k近邻(KNN)、径向基函数(RBF)人工神经网络和支持向量机(SVM)。结果表明,支持向量机的分类效果优于其他分类器。使用SVM时,PCA与低分辨率处理的验证正确率差值仅为0.13%(99.52%对99.39%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信