Evaluation of feature extraction methods for motor imagery-based bcis in terms of robustness to slight changes of electrode locations

Han-Jeong Hwang, C. Im, Sun-Ae Park
{"title":"Evaluation of feature extraction methods for motor imagery-based bcis in terms of robustness to slight changes of electrode locations","authors":"Han-Jeong Hwang, C. Im, Sun-Ae Park","doi":"10.1109/IWW-BCI.2013.6506636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, various feature extraction methods for motor-imagery-based BCI were evaluated in terms of robustness to slight changes in electrode locations. EEG signals were recorded from three reference electrodes (Fz, C3, and C4) and from six additional electrodes located close to the reference electrodes. The performance of four different feature extraction methods [power spectral density (PSD), phase locking value (PLV), a combination of PSD and PLV, and cross-correlation (CC)] were evaluated in terms of robustness to electrode location changes as well as regarding absolute classification accuracy. The quantitative evaluation results demonstrated that the use of either PSD- or CC-based features led to higher classification accuracy than the use of PLV-based features, whereas PSD-based features showed much higher sensitivity to changes in EEG electrode location than CC- or PLV-based features. There results suggest that CC can be a promising feature extraction method in motor-imagery-based BCI studies as it provides high classification accuracy along with being little affected by slight changes in the EEG electrode locations.","PeriodicalId":129758,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Winter Workshop on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Winter Workshop on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWW-BCI.2013.6506636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, various feature extraction methods for motor-imagery-based BCI were evaluated in terms of robustness to slight changes in electrode locations. EEG signals were recorded from three reference electrodes (Fz, C3, and C4) and from six additional electrodes located close to the reference electrodes. The performance of four different feature extraction methods [power spectral density (PSD), phase locking value (PLV), a combination of PSD and PLV, and cross-correlation (CC)] were evaluated in terms of robustness to electrode location changes as well as regarding absolute classification accuracy. The quantitative evaluation results demonstrated that the use of either PSD- or CC-based features led to higher classification accuracy than the use of PLV-based features, whereas PSD-based features showed much higher sensitivity to changes in EEG electrode location than CC- or PLV-based features. There results suggest that CC can be a promising feature extraction method in motor-imagery-based BCI studies as it provides high classification accuracy along with being little affected by slight changes in the EEG electrode locations.
基于运动图像的bcis特征提取方法对电极位置细微变化的鲁棒性评价
在这项研究中,基于运动图像的脑机接口的各种特征提取方法在电极位置轻微变化的鲁棒性方面进行了评估。从三个参考电极(Fz, C3和C4)和靠近参考电极的六个附加电极记录EEG信号。四种不同的特征提取方法[功率谱密度(PSD),锁相值(PLV), PSD和PLV的组合,以及互相关(CC)]的性能在电极位置变化的鲁棒性和绝对分类精度方面进行了评估。定量评价结果表明,基于PSD和CC的特征分类准确率均高于基于plv的特征,而基于PSD的特征对脑电电极位置变化的敏感性远高于基于CC和plv的特征。结果表明,CC方法分类精度高,且不受脑电电极位置变化的影响,是一种很有前途的基于运动图像的脑机接口特征提取方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信