Book Review: Globalizing Automobilism: Exuberance and the Emergence of Layered Mobility, 1900–1980 by Mom Gijs

P. Merriman
{"title":"Book Review: Globalizing Automobilism: Exuberance and the Emergence of Layered Mobility, 1900–1980 by Mom Gijs","authors":"P. Merriman","doi":"10.1177/00225266211042230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Americans and Japanese immigrants, to illustrate how spatial divisions between the two groups reinforced notions of racial difference. The third chapter considers housing campaigns and debates over immigration policy that represented ethnic Mexicans as both permanent settlers and “birds of passage” that would naturally return to Mexico after each harvest. These contradictory discourses eased the tensions between local agriculturalists’ labor needs and federal concerns over immigration in the 1920s. The fourth chapter turns to Mexican immigrant and Mexican American automotive practices, employing a cultural studies lens to reveal how the policing of Latino drivers during the Depression contributed to the perception of driving as a white, middle-class activity despite widespread automobile use by Mexican farmworkers. The fifth chapter addresses a paradox in the suburbs of Los Angeles in the mid-twentieth century. While Latinos and African Americans were able to achieve a degree of social mobility through residential mobility, the expansion of prisons in the region enforced the immobility of surplus workers of color. The final chapter shows how Route 66, a popular tourist highway and regional heritage project, operated in the 1990s as a racial project through the manufacture of nostalgia for mid-twentieth White migration and the erasure of the region’s multiracial residents. To support its argument, the book engages with a broad range of sources, including maps, photographs, song lyrics, radio shows, oral histories, municipal legal codes, local newspapers, and Congressional hearings. These sources contribute new perspectives on the history of mobility in the United States. In contrast to previous research in this area, which has largely elided analyses of race in relation to mobility, Carpio introduces readers to the cultural history of bicycle and automobile use among Asians and Latinos. The author, moreover, includes the racialization of Anglo Americans in their analysis, contributing valuable insight into the relationship between mobility and whiteness in the United States. Despite the centrality of mobility to constructions of the United States as a nation, the insights in Collisions at the Crossroads may indeed be applied to other contexts where the mobility of one social group is advanced at the expense of the mobility of other groups. Carpio’s attention to people’s everyday negotiations with the structures that govern mobility will be of interest to historians of colonial and postcolonial mobility, to cultural historians of bicycles, automobiles, and highways, and to historians of migration, space, and place.","PeriodicalId":336494,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Transport History","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Transport History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266211042230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Americans and Japanese immigrants, to illustrate how spatial divisions between the two groups reinforced notions of racial difference. The third chapter considers housing campaigns and debates over immigration policy that represented ethnic Mexicans as both permanent settlers and “birds of passage” that would naturally return to Mexico after each harvest. These contradictory discourses eased the tensions between local agriculturalists’ labor needs and federal concerns over immigration in the 1920s. The fourth chapter turns to Mexican immigrant and Mexican American automotive practices, employing a cultural studies lens to reveal how the policing of Latino drivers during the Depression contributed to the perception of driving as a white, middle-class activity despite widespread automobile use by Mexican farmworkers. The fifth chapter addresses a paradox in the suburbs of Los Angeles in the mid-twentieth century. While Latinos and African Americans were able to achieve a degree of social mobility through residential mobility, the expansion of prisons in the region enforced the immobility of surplus workers of color. The final chapter shows how Route 66, a popular tourist highway and regional heritage project, operated in the 1990s as a racial project through the manufacture of nostalgia for mid-twentieth White migration and the erasure of the region’s multiracial residents. To support its argument, the book engages with a broad range of sources, including maps, photographs, song lyrics, radio shows, oral histories, municipal legal codes, local newspapers, and Congressional hearings. These sources contribute new perspectives on the history of mobility in the United States. In contrast to previous research in this area, which has largely elided analyses of race in relation to mobility, Carpio introduces readers to the cultural history of bicycle and automobile use among Asians and Latinos. The author, moreover, includes the racialization of Anglo Americans in their analysis, contributing valuable insight into the relationship between mobility and whiteness in the United States. Despite the centrality of mobility to constructions of the United States as a nation, the insights in Collisions at the Crossroads may indeed be applied to other contexts where the mobility of one social group is advanced at the expense of the mobility of other groups. Carpio’s attention to people’s everyday negotiations with the structures that govern mobility will be of interest to historians of colonial and postcolonial mobility, to cultural historians of bicycles, automobiles, and highways, and to historians of migration, space, and place.
书评:《全球化的汽车主义:繁荣和分层交通的出现,1900-1980》,作者:妈妈·吉斯
美国和日本移民,以说明两个群体之间的空间划分如何强化了种族差异的概念。第三章考虑了住房运动和关于移民政策的辩论,这些政策代表了墨西哥人既是永久定居者,也是每次收获后自然会返回墨西哥的“候鸟”。这些相互矛盾的话语缓和了20世纪20年代当地农民的劳动力需求与联邦政府对移民的担忧之间的紧张关系。第四章转向墨西哥移民和墨西哥裔美国人的汽车实践,采用文化研究的视角来揭示大萧条时期对拉丁裔司机的监管如何导致人们认为驾驶是白人中产阶级的活动,尽管墨西哥农场工人广泛使用汽车。第五章论述了二十世纪中期洛杉矶郊区的一个悖论。虽然拉美裔和非裔美国人能够通过居住流动实现一定程度的社会流动,但该地区监狱的扩张迫使有色人种剩余工人无法流动。最后一章展示了66号公路,一个受欢迎的旅游公路和地区遗产项目,如何在20世纪90年代作为一个种族项目运作,通过制造对20世纪中期白人移民的怀旧情绪和该地区多种族居民的抹去。为了支持自己的观点,这本书采用了广泛的资料来源,包括地图、照片、歌词、广播节目、口述历史、市政法律法规、地方报纸和国会听证会。这些资料为研究美国人口流动的历史提供了新的视角。这一领域之前的研究在很大程度上忽略了与流动性相关的种族分析,与此相反,卡皮奥向读者介绍了亚洲人和拉丁美洲人使用自行车和汽车的文化史。此外,作者还将盎格鲁裔美国人的种族化纳入了分析,对美国的流动性与白人之间的关系提供了有价值的见解。尽管流动性在美国作为一个国家的建设中处于中心地位,但《十字路口的碰撞》中的见解确实可以应用于其他背景,在这些背景中,一个社会群体的流动性是以牺牲其他群体的流动性为代价的。卡皮奥关注的是人们与控制流动性的结构之间的日常谈判,这对于研究殖民和后殖民流动性的历史学家,研究自行车、汽车和高速公路的文化历史学家,以及研究移民、空间和地点的历史学家来说,都是很有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信