Linear and undulating resistance training programming induce similar outcomes on physical fitness in elderly women

S. Silva, Flávio de Oliveira Pires, Marifran Tomé Batista Junior, Larissa de Lourdes Padilha Serra, Carlos Brendo Ferreira Reis, Leudyenne Pacheco de Abreu, Paula Tâmara Vieira Teixeira Pereira, C. E. Cabido, R. Leite
{"title":"Linear and undulating resistance training programming induce similar outcomes on physical fitness in elderly women","authors":"S. Silva, Flávio de Oliveira Pires, Marifran Tomé Batista Junior, Larissa de Lourdes Padilha Serra, Carlos Brendo Ferreira Reis, Leudyenne Pacheco de Abreu, Paula Tâmara Vieira Teixeira Pereira, C. E. Cabido, R. Leite","doi":"10.1590/1980-0037.2023v25e77528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of two different types of resistance training programming (linear and daily undulating) on submaximal strength and functional capacity in elderly women. Twenty-two participants (64 ± 3 years) were randomly assigned to 2 training groups: linear programming (LP; n=12) and daily undulating programming (DUP; n =10). Functional capacity and submaximal strength (10RM) were analyzed before and after 12 weeks of resistance training. The results demonstrated improvement on strength and functional capacity after the resistance training period (p ≤ 0.05), except for the Bench Press (p = 0.30), for both groups DUP and LP. The Effect Size was, respectively, high for DUP (timed up and go test = -2.07, and timed sit test= 4.69), and high for LP (horizontal leg press = 2.35). For all other results, the effect size was trivial or small. No statistical difference was observed between programming models. The LP and DUP trainnings have similar results in increasing submaximal muscle strength in elderly women inexperienced in RT after 12 weeks of intervention (p ≤ 0,05). However, DUP appears to be more effective in increasing functional capacity. In practice, the professional can use both the LP and the DUP to improve the level of fitness in the early stages of training in this population. However, when the goal of programming is to increase functional capacity, DUP can be prioritized.","PeriodicalId":106840,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2023v25e77528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of two different types of resistance training programming (linear and daily undulating) on submaximal strength and functional capacity in elderly women. Twenty-two participants (64 ± 3 years) were randomly assigned to 2 training groups: linear programming (LP; n=12) and daily undulating programming (DUP; n =10). Functional capacity and submaximal strength (10RM) were analyzed before and after 12 weeks of resistance training. The results demonstrated improvement on strength and functional capacity after the resistance training period (p ≤ 0.05), except for the Bench Press (p = 0.30), for both groups DUP and LP. The Effect Size was, respectively, high for DUP (timed up and go test = -2.07, and timed sit test= 4.69), and high for LP (horizontal leg press = 2.35). For all other results, the effect size was trivial or small. No statistical difference was observed between programming models. The LP and DUP trainnings have similar results in increasing submaximal muscle strength in elderly women inexperienced in RT after 12 weeks of intervention (p ≤ 0,05). However, DUP appears to be more effective in increasing functional capacity. In practice, the professional can use both the LP and the DUP to improve the level of fitness in the early stages of training in this population. However, when the goal of programming is to increase functional capacity, DUP can be prioritized.
线性和波动阻力训练程序对老年妇女的身体健康产生相似的结果
摘要本研究的目的是分析两种不同类型的阻力训练程序(线性和每日波动)对老年妇女亚极限力量和功能能力的影响。22名参与者(64±3岁)随机分为两个训练组:线性规划训练组(LP;n=12)和每日波动规划(DUP;n = 10)。分析12周阻力训练前后的功能能力和次最大力量(10RM)。结果显示,除了卧推(p = 0.30)外,DUP组和LP组的力量和功能能力在阻力训练后均有改善(p≤0.05)。DUP的效应量分别较高(定时起身和走测试= -2.07,定时坐下测试= 4.69),LP的效应量较高(水平腿推= 2.35)。对于所有其他结果,效应大小微不足道或很小。在编程模型之间没有观察到统计学差异。LP训练和DUP训练在12周干预后对没有接受过RT的老年妇女的亚极大肌力量的增加有相似的结果(p≤0.05)。然而,DUP似乎在提高功能能力方面更有效。在实践中,专业人员可以同时使用LP和DUP来提高这一人群在训练早期的健康水平。但是,当编程的目标是增加功能容量时,可以优先考虑DUP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信