Revisiting overlap invariance in medical image alignment

N. Cahill, J. Schnabel, J. Noble, D. Hawkes
{"title":"Revisiting overlap invariance in medical image alignment","authors":"N. Cahill, J. Schnabel, J. Noble, D. Hawkes","doi":"10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Studholme et al. introduced normalized mutual information (NMI) as an overlap invariant generalization of mutual information (MI). Even though Studholme showed how NMI could be used effectively in multimodal medical image alignment, the overlap invariance was only established empirically on a few simple examples. In this paper, we illustrate a simple example in which NMI fails to be invariant to changes in overlap size, as do other standard similarity measures including MI, cross correlation (CCorr), correlation coefficient (CCoeff), correlation ratio (CR), and entropy correlation coefficient (ECC). We then derive modified forms of all of these similarity measures that are proven to be invariant to changes in overlap size. This is done by making certain assumptions about background statistics. Experiments on multimodal rigid registration of brain images show that 1) most of the modified similarity measures outperform their standard forms, and 2) the modified version of MI exhibits superior performance over any of the other similarity measures for both CT/MR and PET/MR registration.","PeriodicalId":102206,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops","volume":"119 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

In Studholme et al. introduced normalized mutual information (NMI) as an overlap invariant generalization of mutual information (MI). Even though Studholme showed how NMI could be used effectively in multimodal medical image alignment, the overlap invariance was only established empirically on a few simple examples. In this paper, we illustrate a simple example in which NMI fails to be invariant to changes in overlap size, as do other standard similarity measures including MI, cross correlation (CCorr), correlation coefficient (CCoeff), correlation ratio (CR), and entropy correlation coefficient (ECC). We then derive modified forms of all of these similarity measures that are proven to be invariant to changes in overlap size. This is done by making certain assumptions about background statistics. Experiments on multimodal rigid registration of brain images show that 1) most of the modified similarity measures outperform their standard forms, and 2) the modified version of MI exhibits superior performance over any of the other similarity measures for both CT/MR and PET/MR registration.
重述医学图像对齐中的重叠不变性
在Studholme等人引入了归一化互信息(NMI)作为互信息(MI)的重叠不变泛化。尽管Studholme展示了NMI如何有效地用于多模态医学图像对齐,但重叠不变性仅在几个简单的例子上建立了经验。在本文中,我们举例说明了一个简单的例子,其中NMI不能对重叠大小的变化保持不变,其他标准的相似性度量包括MI、相互关系(CCorr)、相关系数(CCoeff)、相关比率(CR)和熵相关系数(ECC)。然后,我们推导出所有这些相似性度量的修改形式,这些相似性度量被证明对重叠大小的变化是不变的。这是通过对背景统计数据做出某些假设来实现的。脑图像的多模态刚性配准实验表明:1)大多数改进的相似度度量优于其标准形式;2)改进的MI在CT/MR和PET/MR配准方面都优于其他任何相似度度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信