Biomechanical Study. The Role of Osteoporotic or Osteoarthritic Bone in Determining the Fixation Achieved Within the Femoral Head by the Lag Screw Elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade
F. O’Neill, T. McGloughlin, B. Lenehan, F. Condon, J. Coffey, M. Walsh
{"title":"Biomechanical Study. The Role of Osteoporotic or Osteoarthritic Bone in Determining the Fixation Achieved Within the Femoral Head by the Lag Screw Elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade","authors":"F. O’Neill, T. McGloughlin, B. Lenehan, F. Condon, J. Coffey, M. Walsh","doi":"10.5580/2c51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study was conducted to investigate the fixation that the lag screw elements of two different implants used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures achieve within osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral heads, as a practical means of comparing the mechanical properties of osteoporotic bone against those of osteoarthritic bone. Methods The lag screw elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade were the two lag screws that were chosen to conduct this study with. “Pushout” tests were performed as the means to investigate the fixation that each lag screw achieved within the femoral heads, as the most common mode of failure with these devices is ‘cut-out’ Results The results demonstrate that the difference in mechanical properties between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone in cadaveric femoral heads mean that the devices used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures achieve a much greater fixation within osteoarthritic bone. The results also demonstrate that the overall failure patterns were similar for each device within both the osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone apart from the large difference in forces achieved. Conclusion The results demonstrate, that as expected when the density of the bone increases, in general the implants achieve better fixation within it. However this study also demonstrates that it is the implant that dictates the pattern of failure and not the bone.","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2c51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective This study was conducted to investigate the fixation that the lag screw elements of two different implants used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures achieve within osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral heads, as a practical means of comparing the mechanical properties of osteoporotic bone against those of osteoarthritic bone. Methods The lag screw elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade were the two lag screws that were chosen to conduct this study with. “Pushout” tests were performed as the means to investigate the fixation that each lag screw achieved within the femoral heads, as the most common mode of failure with these devices is ‘cut-out’ Results The results demonstrate that the difference in mechanical properties between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone in cadaveric femoral heads mean that the devices used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures achieve a much greater fixation within osteoarthritic bone. The results also demonstrate that the overall failure patterns were similar for each device within both the osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone apart from the large difference in forces achieved. Conclusion The results demonstrate, that as expected when the density of the bone increases, in general the implants achieve better fixation within it. However this study also demonstrates that it is the implant that dictates the pattern of failure and not the bone.
目的研究两种不同植入物的拉力螺钉在骨质疏松性和骨关节炎性股骨头内的固定效果,作为比较骨质疏松性骨和骨关节炎性骨力学性能的实用方法。方法选择动力髋螺钉(Dynamic Hip screw, DHS)的拉力螺钉单元和DHS Blade作为拉力螺钉进行研究。“推出”试验是研究每个拉力螺钉在股骨头内的固定效果的方法,因为这些装置最常见的失效模式是“切断”。结果表明,尸体股骨头中骨质疏松和骨关节炎骨头的力学特性差异意味着用于固定转子间骨折的装置在骨关节炎骨头内的固定效果要大得多。结果还表明,除了所获得的力有很大差异外,每种装置在骨质疏松症和骨关节炎骨骼中的总体失效模式相似。结论随着骨密度的增加,种植体在骨内的固定效果较好。然而,这项研究也表明,是种植体决定了失败的模式,而不是骨骼。