Biomechanical Study. The Role of Osteoporotic or Osteoarthritic Bone in Determining the Fixation Achieved Within the Femoral Head by the Lag Screw Elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade

F. O’Neill, T. McGloughlin, B. Lenehan, F. Condon, J. Coffey, M. Walsh
{"title":"Biomechanical Study. The Role of Osteoporotic or Osteoarthritic Bone in Determining the Fixation Achieved Within the Femoral Head by the Lag Screw Elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade","authors":"F. O’Neill, T. McGloughlin, B. Lenehan, F. Condon, J. Coffey, M. Walsh","doi":"10.5580/2c51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study was conducted to investigate the fixation that the lag screw elements of two different implants used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures achieve within osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral heads, as a practical means of comparing the mechanical properties of osteoporotic bone against those of osteoarthritic bone. Methods The lag screw elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade were the two lag screws that were chosen to conduct this study with. “Pushout” tests were performed as the means to investigate the fixation that each lag screw achieved within the femoral heads, as the most common mode of failure with these devices is ‘cut-out’ Results The results demonstrate that the difference in mechanical properties between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone in cadaveric femoral heads mean that the devices used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures achieve a much greater fixation within osteoarthritic bone. The results also demonstrate that the overall failure patterns were similar for each device within both the osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone apart from the large difference in forces achieved. Conclusion The results demonstrate, that as expected when the density of the bone increases, in general the implants achieve better fixation within it. However this study also demonstrates that it is the implant that dictates the pattern of failure and not the bone.","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2c51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study was conducted to investigate the fixation that the lag screw elements of two different implants used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures achieve within osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral heads, as a practical means of comparing the mechanical properties of osteoporotic bone against those of osteoarthritic bone. Methods The lag screw elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade were the two lag screws that were chosen to conduct this study with. “Pushout” tests were performed as the means to investigate the fixation that each lag screw achieved within the femoral heads, as the most common mode of failure with these devices is ‘cut-out’ Results The results demonstrate that the difference in mechanical properties between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone in cadaveric femoral heads mean that the devices used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures achieve a much greater fixation within osteoarthritic bone. The results also demonstrate that the overall failure patterns were similar for each device within both the osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone apart from the large difference in forces achieved. Conclusion The results demonstrate, that as expected when the density of the bone increases, in general the implants achieve better fixation within it. However this study also demonstrates that it is the implant that dictates the pattern of failure and not the bone.
生物力学研究。骨质疏松或骨关节炎的骨在确定动力髋螺钉(DHS)和DHS刀片的拉力螺钉元件在股骨头内固定的作用
目的研究两种不同植入物的拉力螺钉在骨质疏松性和骨关节炎性股骨头内的固定效果,作为比较骨质疏松性骨和骨关节炎性骨力学性能的实用方法。方法选择动力髋螺钉(Dynamic Hip screw, DHS)的拉力螺钉单元和DHS Blade作为拉力螺钉进行研究。“推出”试验是研究每个拉力螺钉在股骨头内的固定效果的方法,因为这些装置最常见的失效模式是“切断”。结果表明,尸体股骨头中骨质疏松和骨关节炎骨头的力学特性差异意味着用于固定转子间骨折的装置在骨关节炎骨头内的固定效果要大得多。结果还表明,除了所获得的力有很大差异外,每种装置在骨质疏松症和骨关节炎骨骼中的总体失效模式相似。结论随着骨密度的增加,种植体在骨内的固定效果较好。然而,这项研究也表明,是种植体决定了失败的模式,而不是骨骼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信