M. Lemmon
{"title":"Achieving Ecological Resilience Through Regime Shift Management","authors":"M. Lemmon","doi":"10.1561/2600000021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resilience has come to mean several things in the system sciences. The term is used to describe systems whose function is robust with respect to external disturbances. It is used to describe systems that tolerate faults in some internal component. It is also used to describe systems that have the capacity to recover after a complete collapse of system function. This monograph defines resilience in the last sense. This notion of resilience is often called ecological resilience. For a system to be ecologically resilient, one first accepts system collapse as being inevitable and then requires that the resources for subsequent system recovery be buried in the wreckage of that collapse. The ecological concept of a regime shift plays an important role in describing abrupt shifts in ecosystem behavior. In particular, the collapse of system function may be seen as an instance of a regime shift. Restoring a collapsed ecosystem often involves walking the system through a sequence of alternative states before full recovery can be achieved. The transitions between these alternative states are also regime shifts. But in this case, these regime shifts are purposefully M. D. Lemmon (2020), “Achieving Ecological Resilience Through Regime Shift Management”, Foundations and Trends © in Systems and Control: Vol. 7, No. 4, pp 384–499. DOI: 10.1561/2600000021. Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2600000021","PeriodicalId":306000,"journal":{"name":"Found. Trends Syst. Control.","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Found. Trends Syst. Control.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/2600000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
通过制度转换管理实现生态弹性
在系统科学中,弹性意味着几件事。该术语用于描述其功能相对于外部干扰具有鲁棒性的系统。它用来描述在某些内部组件中可以容忍故障的系统。它也用于描述在系统功能完全崩溃后具有恢复能力的系统。这本专著从最后一个意义上定义了弹性。这种弹性的概念通常被称为生态弹性。为了使一个系统具有生态弹性,人们首先接受系统崩溃是不可避免的,然后要求将随后系统恢复的资源埋在崩溃的残骸中。制度转移的生态概念在描述生态系统行为的突变方面起着重要作用。特别是,系统功能的崩溃可能被视为政权转移的一个实例。在完全恢复之前,恢复崩溃的生态系统通常需要让系统经历一系列不同的状态。这些可选状态之间的转换也是制度转换。但在这种情况下,这些政权转移是有目的的m.d.莱蒙(2020),“通过政权转移管理实现生态弹性”,基础和趋势©在系统和控制:第7卷,第4期,第384-499页。DOI: 10.1561 / 2600000021。全文可在:http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2600000021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。