Three Methods for Optimizing Single-Shortest Path Routing

M. Dzida, M. Zagozdzon, M. Żotkiewicz, M. Pettersson, M. Pióro, M. Duelli, M. Menth
{"title":"Three Methods for Optimizing Single-Shortest Path Routing","authors":"M. Dzida, M. Zagozdzon, M. Żotkiewicz, M. Pettersson, M. Pióro, M. Duelli, M. Menth","doi":"10.1109/NGI.2008.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intra-domain routing in IP networks is based on the shortest path principle by assigning administrative weights (costs) to links. The resulting least-cost paths determine routes between pairs of routers. If several such equal-cost paths exist between a pair of routers, it may not be clear which of them is actually used to route traffic. This makes it difficult to predict the network traffic flow distribution. Therefore, the selected link costs should assure uniqueness of the shortest paths. On top of that, the link costs can be optimized with respect to some traffic objective. The resulting optimization problem, referred to as SSPP, turns out to be NP-hard. SSPP can be formulated as a mixed-integer programming problem and, as such, solved with branch-and- bound (B&B). In this paper, we consider three methods for SSPP. Two of them are exact methods based on B&B, namely branch- and-cut and constraint programming. Since the exact solutions of SSPP may require excessive computation time and may not always be effective when applied to practical networks, we also study a fast heuristic method. Finally, in a numerical study, we compare the effectiveness of the three approaches.","PeriodicalId":182496,"journal":{"name":"2008 Next Generation Internet Networks","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Next Generation Internet Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NGI.2008.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Intra-domain routing in IP networks is based on the shortest path principle by assigning administrative weights (costs) to links. The resulting least-cost paths determine routes between pairs of routers. If several such equal-cost paths exist between a pair of routers, it may not be clear which of them is actually used to route traffic. This makes it difficult to predict the network traffic flow distribution. Therefore, the selected link costs should assure uniqueness of the shortest paths. On top of that, the link costs can be optimized with respect to some traffic objective. The resulting optimization problem, referred to as SSPP, turns out to be NP-hard. SSPP can be formulated as a mixed-integer programming problem and, as such, solved with branch-and- bound (B&B). In this paper, we consider three methods for SSPP. Two of them are exact methods based on B&B, namely branch- and-cut and constraint programming. Since the exact solutions of SSPP may require excessive computation time and may not always be effective when applied to practical networks, we also study a fast heuristic method. Finally, in a numerical study, we compare the effectiveness of the three approaches.
单最短路径路由优化的三种方法
IP网络中的域内路由基于最短路径原则,为链路分配管理权值(cost)。所得的最小代价路径决定了路由器对之间的路由。如果一对路由器之间存在几个这样的等价路径,则可能不清楚其中哪一个实际用于路由流量。这使得预测网络流量分布变得困难。因此,所选择的链路开销必须保证最短路径的唯一性。最重要的是,链接成本可以根据一些流量目标进行优化。由此产生的优化问题(称为SSPP)是np困难的。SSPP可以表述为一个混合整数规划问题,因此可以用分支定界法(B&B)求解。在本文中,我们考虑了三种SSPP方法。其中两种是基于B&B的精确方法,即分支切割和约束规划。由于SSPP的精确解可能需要大量的计算时间,并且在实际网络中并不总是有效的,我们还研究了一种快速的启发式方法。最后,在数值研究中,我们比较了三种方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信