Living Well Together: On Happiness, Social Goods and Genuinely Progressive Sociology

N. Thin
{"title":"Living Well Together: On Happiness, Social Goods and Genuinely Progressive Sociology","authors":"N. Thin","doi":"10.46692/9781529206159.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sociologists, planners, and activists are prone to treating society as if it were an enemy of wellbeing. This ‘disapproval addiction’ seriously inhibits our ability to understand and foster the social goods that make happiness possible. Instead of focusing mainly on social pathologies, we could instead cultivate more deliberately appreciative and aspirational approaches to social qualities. Appreciation and positive promotion of happiness and social goods could then become our core concern. This chapter proposes the deliberate and explicit adoption of a ‘happiness lens’ in social scholarship and planning so as to emphasise positivity, empathy, and integrative linkages between life domains through the life course. This lens is used to explore different kinds of claim to foster ‘social progress’: remedial; preventive; provisional; and ultimately genuine moral progress. It is proposed that this could make our social learning strategies more appreciative and our social plans more aspirational and uplifting. Conversely, and more provocatively, it is argued that we cannot claim to be ‘ethical’, or ‘progressive’, or even ‘politically engaged’ if we don’t make happiness an explicit and central concern in social research and social planning. Overall, these arguments are intended to highlight the ‘disruptive’ potential of a happiness lens.","PeriodicalId":311525,"journal":{"name":"Researching Happiness","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Researching Happiness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529206159.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sociologists, planners, and activists are prone to treating society as if it were an enemy of wellbeing. This ‘disapproval addiction’ seriously inhibits our ability to understand and foster the social goods that make happiness possible. Instead of focusing mainly on social pathologies, we could instead cultivate more deliberately appreciative and aspirational approaches to social qualities. Appreciation and positive promotion of happiness and social goods could then become our core concern. This chapter proposes the deliberate and explicit adoption of a ‘happiness lens’ in social scholarship and planning so as to emphasise positivity, empathy, and integrative linkages between life domains through the life course. This lens is used to explore different kinds of claim to foster ‘social progress’: remedial; preventive; provisional; and ultimately genuine moral progress. It is proposed that this could make our social learning strategies more appreciative and our social plans more aspirational and uplifting. Conversely, and more provocatively, it is argued that we cannot claim to be ‘ethical’, or ‘progressive’, or even ‘politically engaged’ if we don’t make happiness an explicit and central concern in social research and social planning. Overall, these arguments are intended to highlight the ‘disruptive’ potential of a happiness lens.
共同生活:论幸福、社会产品和真正进步的社会学
社会学家、计划者和活动家倾向于将社会视为幸福的敌人。这种“不赞成成瘾”严重抑制了我们理解和培养使幸福成为可能的社会利益的能力。与其把注意力主要集中在社会病态上,我们不如培养更有意识地欣赏和追求社会品质的方法。欣赏和积极促进幸福和社会产品可能成为我们的核心关注。本章建议在社会学术和规划中刻意和明确地采用“幸福镜头”,以强调生命历程中生活领域之间的积极性、同理心和综合联系。这个镜头被用来探索促进“社会进步”的不同类型的主张:补救;预防;临时的;以及最终真正的道德进步。有人提出,这可以使我们的社会学习策略更有价值,我们的社会计划更有抱负和令人振奋。相反,更具有挑衅性的是,有人认为,如果我们不把幸福作为社会研究和社会规划的明确和核心关注,我们就不能声称自己是“道德的”、“进步的”,甚至是“政治参与的”。总的来说,这些论点旨在强调幸福镜头的“破坏性”潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信