Ontological causality as the demarcation criterion of scientific & philosophical fields: things and objects vs. criteria vs. processes

K. Papageorgiou, Demetrios E. Lekkas
{"title":"Ontological causality as the demarcation criterion of scientific & philosophical fields: things and objects vs. criteria vs. processes","authors":"K. Papageorgiou, Demetrios E. Lekkas","doi":"10.12681/eml.31033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper follows an interdisciplinary approach through at least three disciplines, i.e. logic, ontology and sociology (of expertise). Its aim is to provide a useful tool for the fields related to the study of expertise to demarcate the various scientific fields. In the process several issues are also addressed; issues such as causation and negation that are equally important for this discussion but current literature does not and maybe cannot cover.","PeriodicalId":127692,"journal":{"name":"Epistēmēs Metron Logos","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistēmēs Metron Logos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/eml.31033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper follows an interdisciplinary approach through at least three disciplines, i.e. logic, ontology and sociology (of expertise). Its aim is to provide a useful tool for the fields related to the study of expertise to demarcate the various scientific fields. In the process several issues are also addressed; issues such as causation and negation that are equally important for this discussion but current literature does not and maybe cannot cover.
本体论的因果关系作为科学和哲学领域的划分标准:事物和对象vs标准vs过程
本文遵循跨学科的方法,通过至少三个学科,即逻辑学,本体论和社会学(专业知识)。它的目的是为与专业知识研究相关的领域提供一个有用的工具来划分不同的科学领域。在此过程中,还讨论了几个问题;诸如因果关系和否定的问题,对这个讨论同样重要,但目前的文献没有,也可能无法涵盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信