Volcanic ASH events: When the role of decision maker is assigned to a pilot

Ružica Vujasinović
{"title":"Volcanic ASH events: When the role of decision maker is assigned to a pilot","authors":"Ružica Vujasinović","doi":"10.1109/ICNSURV.2012.6218437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The volcanic eruption that occurred in Iceland in April 2010 (the Eyjafjallajökull eruption) had an adversely impact on aviation in Europe. This event then spurred aviation key actors into action, so leading experts gathered up to, firstly, define issues that had to be solved and, secondly, to try to prepare aviation for the eventual volcanic ash event in future. The progress was already noticeable just a year later (in May 2011), when another volcanic eruption occurred in Iceland (the Grimsvötn eruption). At that time the impact on aviation was already much lower than in 2010. These days, we witness the development process in information exchange area and regulations area in Europe. EUROCONTROL established a new tool called EVITA which provides a better data exchange process in a volcanic ash event and civil aviation authorities among Europe developed a new regulation approach providing the possibility for airlines to be the part of the decision making process concerning the question whether to fly or not in the contaminated airspace. But is there a possibility to have an improvement in other areas, too? Can we progress towards the process of forecasting movements of an ash-cloud more precisely and using that information the improvement of operational efficiency while maintaining safety in a crisis period? What are the tools that we need for this purpose? Institute of Flight Guidance (DLR - German Aerospace Center) is currently working on a development of a new volcanic ash event concept in order to try to answer those questions. This concept is called “pilot in-charge” and connote that the role of the decision maker whether to fly or not should be assigned to a pilot. Development of this concept is at the end of its first phase (the objective and assessment of technical possibilities to achieve it are established). The final phase should be a development of FMS (back-up support system for pilots when there is a presence of an ash-cloud in the air) that is going to be able of proposing, planning and optimizing a flight path in-flight.","PeriodicalId":126055,"journal":{"name":"2012 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2012.6218437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The volcanic eruption that occurred in Iceland in April 2010 (the Eyjafjallajökull eruption) had an adversely impact on aviation in Europe. This event then spurred aviation key actors into action, so leading experts gathered up to, firstly, define issues that had to be solved and, secondly, to try to prepare aviation for the eventual volcanic ash event in future. The progress was already noticeable just a year later (in May 2011), when another volcanic eruption occurred in Iceland (the Grimsvötn eruption). At that time the impact on aviation was already much lower than in 2010. These days, we witness the development process in information exchange area and regulations area in Europe. EUROCONTROL established a new tool called EVITA which provides a better data exchange process in a volcanic ash event and civil aviation authorities among Europe developed a new regulation approach providing the possibility for airlines to be the part of the decision making process concerning the question whether to fly or not in the contaminated airspace. But is there a possibility to have an improvement in other areas, too? Can we progress towards the process of forecasting movements of an ash-cloud more precisely and using that information the improvement of operational efficiency while maintaining safety in a crisis period? What are the tools that we need for this purpose? Institute of Flight Guidance (DLR - German Aerospace Center) is currently working on a development of a new volcanic ash event concept in order to try to answer those questions. This concept is called “pilot in-charge” and connote that the role of the decision maker whether to fly or not should be assigned to a pilot. Development of this concept is at the end of its first phase (the objective and assessment of technical possibilities to achieve it are established). The final phase should be a development of FMS (back-up support system for pilots when there is a presence of an ash-cloud in the air) that is going to be able of proposing, planning and optimizing a flight path in-flight.
火山灰事件:当决策者的角色被分配给飞行员时
2010年4月发生在冰岛的火山喷发(Eyjafjallajökull火山喷发)对欧洲的航空产生了不利影响。这一事件促使航空业的主要参与者采取行动,因此主要专家聚集在一起,首先确定必须解决的问题,其次,试图为未来最终的火山灰事件做好航空业的准备。仅仅一年后(2011年5月),冰岛又发生了一次火山喷发(Grimsvötn火山喷发),这一进展就已经显而易见了。当时对航空业的影响已经远远低于2010年。这些天来,我们见证了欧洲在信息交换领域和法规领域的发展过程。EUROCONTROL建立了一种名为EVITA的新工具,该工具在火山灰事件中提供了更好的数据交换过程,欧洲民航当局制定了一种新的监管方法,使航空公司有可能参与有关是否在受污染空域飞行的决策过程。但是在其他方面是否也有可能有所改善呢?我们能否更精确地预测火山灰云的运动,并利用这些信息提高业务效率,同时在危机时期保持安全?我们需要哪些工具来达到这个目的?飞行制导研究所(DLR -德国航空航天中心)目前正致力于开发一种新的火山灰事件概念,以试图回答这些问题。这个概念被称为“飞行员负责”,意味着是否飞行的决策者角色应该分配给飞行员。这一概念的发展正处于第一阶段的末尾(确定了实现这一概念的技术可能性的目标和评估)。最后一个阶段应该是开发FMS(空中有火山灰云时飞行员的后备支持系统),该系统将能够在飞行中提出、规划和优化飞行路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信