Pricing in Ride-Sharing Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach

Siddhartha Banerjee, Ramesh Johari, C. Riquelme
{"title":"Pricing in Ride-Sharing Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach","authors":"Siddhartha Banerjee, Ramesh Johari, C. Riquelme","doi":"10.1145/2764468.2764527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study optimal pricing strategies for ride-sharing platforms, using a queueing-theoretic economic model. Analysis of pricing in such settings is complex: On one hand these platforms are two-sided - this requires economic models that capture the incentives of both drivers and passengers. On the other hand, these platforms support very high temporal-resolution for data collection and pricing - this requires stochastic models that capture the dynamics of drivers and passengers in the system. We focus our attention on the value of dynamic pricing: where prices can react to instantaneous imbalances between available supply and incoming demand. We find two main results: We first show that profit under any dynamic pricing strategy cannot exceed profit under the optimal static pricing policy (i.e., one which is agnostic of stochastic fluctuations in the system load). This result belies the prevalence of dynamic pricing in practice. Our second result explains the apparent paradox: we show that dynamic pricing is much more robust to fluctuations in system parameters compared to static pricing. Moreover, these results hold even if the monopolist maximizes welfare or throughput. Thus dynamic pricing does not necessarily yield higher performance than static pricing - however, it lets platforms realize the benefits of optimal static pricing, even with imperfect knowledge of system parameters.","PeriodicalId":376992,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"231","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2764468.2764527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 231

Abstract

We study optimal pricing strategies for ride-sharing platforms, using a queueing-theoretic economic model. Analysis of pricing in such settings is complex: On one hand these platforms are two-sided - this requires economic models that capture the incentives of both drivers and passengers. On the other hand, these platforms support very high temporal-resolution for data collection and pricing - this requires stochastic models that capture the dynamics of drivers and passengers in the system. We focus our attention on the value of dynamic pricing: where prices can react to instantaneous imbalances between available supply and incoming demand. We find two main results: We first show that profit under any dynamic pricing strategy cannot exceed profit under the optimal static pricing policy (i.e., one which is agnostic of stochastic fluctuations in the system load). This result belies the prevalence of dynamic pricing in practice. Our second result explains the apparent paradox: we show that dynamic pricing is much more robust to fluctuations in system parameters compared to static pricing. Moreover, these results hold even if the monopolist maximizes welfare or throughput. Thus dynamic pricing does not necessarily yield higher performance than static pricing - however, it lets platforms realize the benefits of optimal static pricing, even with imperfect knowledge of system parameters.
拼车平台定价:一种排队理论方法
本文利用排队经济模型研究了拼车平台的最优定价策略。在这种情况下对定价的分析是复杂的:一方面,这些平台是双面的——这需要经济模型能够同时捕捉司机和乘客的动机。另一方面,这些平台在数据收集和定价方面支持非常高的时间分辨率——这需要随机模型来捕捉系统中司机和乘客的动态。我们把注意力集中在动态定价的价值上:价格可以对现有供应和未来需求之间的瞬时失衡做出反应。我们发现了两个主要结果:我们首先证明了任何动态定价策略下的利润都不能超过最优静态定价策略下的利润(即不可知系统负荷随机波动的静态定价策略)。这一结果掩盖了动态定价在实践中的普遍存在。我们的第二个结果解释了明显的悖论:我们表明,与静态定价相比,动态定价对系统参数波动的鲁棒性要强得多。此外,即使垄断者最大化福利或产量,这些结果也成立。因此,动态定价并不一定比静态定价产生更高的性能——然而,它让平台意识到最优静态定价的好处,即使对系统参数的了解并不完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信