Input Indivisibility and the Measurement Error

Dipankar Das
{"title":"Input Indivisibility and the Measurement Error","authors":"Dipankar Das","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3906650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The neoclassical theory of production supports the identity i.e. the Output-Labor ratio equals wage-labor ratio plus profit labor ratio. Here profit is treated as capital. The variables wage to labor ratio and capital to labor ratio are considered real variables in the neoclassical theory; so that the identity can be differentiated by these two variables in mathematical calculations of the growth of the output per unit of labor. The paper shows that these variables are not the real variables at all times. Hence, the derived measurement of this identity is not true. The paper tries to explain the topological behavior of these variables and explains the possible conditions to be the real numbers.","PeriodicalId":299310,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The neoclassical theory of production supports the identity i.e. the Output-Labor ratio equals wage-labor ratio plus profit labor ratio. Here profit is treated as capital. The variables wage to labor ratio and capital to labor ratio are considered real variables in the neoclassical theory; so that the identity can be differentiated by these two variables in mathematical calculations of the growth of the output per unit of labor. The paper shows that these variables are not the real variables at all times. Hence, the derived measurement of this identity is not true. The paper tries to explain the topological behavior of these variables and explains the possible conditions to be the real numbers.
输入不可分性与测量误差
新古典生产理论支持同一性,即产出劳动比等于工资劳动比加上利润劳动比。在这里利润被视为资本。在新古典主义理论中,工资劳动比和资本劳动比被认为是实变量;这样恒等式就可以在数学计算单位劳动产出增长时用这两个变量来区分。本文证明了这些变量在任何时候都不是实变量。因此,这个恒等式的推导度量是不正确的。本文试图解释这些变量的拓扑行为,并解释其为实数的可能条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信