Experimental Comparison between WASP and LSASF in Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir Cores Bearing Heavy Oil

Hasan N. Al-Saedi, Yifu Long, U. Alameedy, W. Al-Bazzaz, R. Flori
{"title":"Experimental Comparison between WASP and LSASF in Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir Cores Bearing Heavy Oil","authors":"Hasan N. Al-Saedi, Yifu Long, U. Alameedy, W. Al-Bazzaz, R. Flori","doi":"10.2118/193731-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Low salinity (LS) water flooding is a promising EOR method which has been examined by many experimental studies and field pilots for a variety of reservoirs and oils. This paper investigates applying LS flooding to a heavy oil. Increasing the LS water temperature improves heavy oil recovery by achieving higher sweep efficiency and improving oil mobility by lowering its viscosity. Steam flooding projects have reported many problems such as steam gravity override, but override can be lessened if the steam is is alternated with hot LS water. In this study, a series of reservoir sandstone cores were obtained from Bartlesville Sandstone (in Eastern Kansas) and aged with heavy crude oil (from the same reservoir) at 95°C for 45 days. Five reservoir cores were used in this study, and five treatments were performed. They were flooded with (a) steam; (b) formation hot water (FHW); (c) low salinity hot water (LSHW; (d) steam + FHW; and (e) steam + LSHW (so-called LSASF). The laboratory experiments showed that basic water flooding using FW recovered approximately 50% of OOIP. After that initial flood, upon switching to the various steam, FHW, LSHW, steam + FHW, and steam + LSHW treatments, the incremental oil recoveries were 5, 3.1, 6.3, 7.5, and 12% OOIP, respectively. The contact angle measurements showed that injecting steam + LSHW alters the wettability considerably more than using steam + FHW. The results of this work show that water flooding using LSHW in reservoir cores could improve oil recovery significantly because it both reduces oil viscosity and alters the rock wettability towards more water-wet. The results also showed using LSHW alternated with steam is more beneficial than using steam only or alternated with regular water due to the combined benefits of reducing gravity override and altering the wettability. Using LSHW water is more economical than using steam and gives significantly improved oil recovery, and using LSHW is more beneficial than ambient temperature LS water.","PeriodicalId":137875,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, December 12, 2018","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, December 12, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193731-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Low salinity (LS) water flooding is a promising EOR method which has been examined by many experimental studies and field pilots for a variety of reservoirs and oils. This paper investigates applying LS flooding to a heavy oil. Increasing the LS water temperature improves heavy oil recovery by achieving higher sweep efficiency and improving oil mobility by lowering its viscosity. Steam flooding projects have reported many problems such as steam gravity override, but override can be lessened if the steam is is alternated with hot LS water. In this study, a series of reservoir sandstone cores were obtained from Bartlesville Sandstone (in Eastern Kansas) and aged with heavy crude oil (from the same reservoir) at 95°C for 45 days. Five reservoir cores were used in this study, and five treatments were performed. They were flooded with (a) steam; (b) formation hot water (FHW); (c) low salinity hot water (LSHW; (d) steam + FHW; and (e) steam + LSHW (so-called LSASF). The laboratory experiments showed that basic water flooding using FW recovered approximately 50% of OOIP. After that initial flood, upon switching to the various steam, FHW, LSHW, steam + FHW, and steam + LSHW treatments, the incremental oil recoveries were 5, 3.1, 6.3, 7.5, and 12% OOIP, respectively. The contact angle measurements showed that injecting steam + LSHW alters the wettability considerably more than using steam + FHW. The results of this work show that water flooding using LSHW in reservoir cores could improve oil recovery significantly because it both reduces oil viscosity and alters the rock wettability towards more water-wet. The results also showed using LSHW alternated with steam is more beneficial than using steam only or alternated with regular water due to the combined benefits of reducing gravity override and altering the wettability. Using LSHW water is more economical than using steam and gives significantly improved oil recovery, and using LSHW is more beneficial than ambient temperature LS water.
WASP与LSASF在Bartlesville砂岩储层稠油岩心中的实验比较
低矿化度(LS)水驱是一种很有前途的提高采收率方法,已经经过了许多实验研究和现场试验,适用于各种油藏和油类。研究了LS驱油在稠油中的应用。提高LS水温可以通过提高波及效率提高稠油采收率,并通过降低粘度改善油的流动性。蒸汽驱项目报告了许多问题,例如蒸汽重力覆盖,但如果蒸汽与热水交替使用,覆盖可以减少。在这项研究中,从Bartlesville砂岩(位于堪萨斯州东部)获得了一系列油藏砂岩岩心,并使用来自同一油藏的重质原油在95°C下进行了45天的老化。本研究使用了5个储层岩心,进行了5次处理。他们被蒸汽淹没了;(b)地层热水(FHW);(c)低盐度热水;(d)蒸汽+ FHW;(e)蒸汽+ LSHW(所谓LSASF)。室内实验表明,使用FW进行基础水驱可回收约50%的OOIP。在初始驱油后,切换到蒸汽、FHW、LSHW、蒸汽+ FHW和蒸汽+ LSHW处理后,原油采收率分别增加了5%、3.1%、6.3、7.5和12%。接触角测量结果表明,注入蒸汽+ LSHW对润湿性的影响明显大于蒸汽+ FHW。这项工作的结果表明,在储层岩心中使用LSHW进行水驱可以显著提高采收率,因为它既降低了油的粘度,又改变了岩石的润湿性,使其更亲水。结果还表明,由于减少重力覆盖和改变润湿性的综合效益,LSHW与蒸汽交替使用比仅使用蒸汽或与普通水交替使用更有益。使用LSHW水比使用蒸汽更经济,并且显著提高了采收率,使用LSHW水比使用常温LS水更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信