Pressure Build-Up in Closed Wells During Kick Migration and Fluid Compressibility Effects

M. Agonafir, J. Petersen, K. Fjelde
{"title":"Pressure Build-Up in Closed Wells During Kick Migration and Fluid Compressibility Effects","authors":"M. Agonafir, J. Petersen, K. Fjelde","doi":"10.1115/omae2022-79700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n If a kick is migrating in a closed well, this will lead to pressures building up in the well. It has earlier been shown that for Non-Newtonian fluids, suspension effects will make it impossible to deduce a unique gas velocity from the pressure build-up behavior.\n In this work, it will be shown that also for Newtonian fluids, the pressure build-up will depend on both kick size and well volumes. Both very small kicks sizes typically seen in MPD operations and larger kick sizes handled in conventional well control operations will be considered. It will be demonstrated that both the shape of the pressure build-up and the final pressure levels achieved will vary significantly. It is especially when considering very small kick sizes that one starts to see large changes in the profile of the pressure build-up. The main reason for the differences is related to the fact that the liquid phase is compressible and this will again have consequences for how much a gas kick can expand and what pressures it can bring to surface.\n An analytical model will be developed that shows directly which parameters have impact on the pressure build-up behavior. Simple closure laws for gas density, fluid density and gas slip will be chosen. The model will be verified against two transient models which are based on the Drift-Flux formulation. It is demonstrated that the pressure build-up and final pressure level will depend on initial kick volume, initial fluid volume, liquid compressibility and fluid density. The effect of numerical diffusion when comparing the two transient models will also briefly be discussed.\n The purpose of the paper is to increase fundamental knowledge about two phase flow dynamics and show that an analytical model for the situation considered here can give results that are comparable with the results achieved with more complex transient flow models.","PeriodicalId":363084,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Petroleum Technology","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Petroleum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2022-79700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If a kick is migrating in a closed well, this will lead to pressures building up in the well. It has earlier been shown that for Non-Newtonian fluids, suspension effects will make it impossible to deduce a unique gas velocity from the pressure build-up behavior. In this work, it will be shown that also for Newtonian fluids, the pressure build-up will depend on both kick size and well volumes. Both very small kicks sizes typically seen in MPD operations and larger kick sizes handled in conventional well control operations will be considered. It will be demonstrated that both the shape of the pressure build-up and the final pressure levels achieved will vary significantly. It is especially when considering very small kick sizes that one starts to see large changes in the profile of the pressure build-up. The main reason for the differences is related to the fact that the liquid phase is compressible and this will again have consequences for how much a gas kick can expand and what pressures it can bring to surface. An analytical model will be developed that shows directly which parameters have impact on the pressure build-up behavior. Simple closure laws for gas density, fluid density and gas slip will be chosen. The model will be verified against two transient models which are based on the Drift-Flux formulation. It is demonstrated that the pressure build-up and final pressure level will depend on initial kick volume, initial fluid volume, liquid compressibility and fluid density. The effect of numerical diffusion when comparing the two transient models will also briefly be discussed. The purpose of the paper is to increase fundamental knowledge about two phase flow dynamics and show that an analytical model for the situation considered here can give results that are comparable with the results achieved with more complex transient flow models.
井涌运移过程中闭井压力累积及流体压缩性影响
如果井涌在封闭井中移动,将导致井内压力增加。先前已经证明,对于非牛顿流体,悬浮效应将使从压力积聚行为中推断出独特的气体速度成为不可能。在这项工作中,我们将证明,对于牛顿流体,压力的积累也取决于井涌规模和井体积。MPD作业中常见的小井涌尺寸和常规井控作业中处理的大井涌尺寸都将被考虑在内。这将证明,压力积聚的形状和最终达到的压力水平将有很大的不同。特别是当考虑很小的井涌尺寸时,人们开始看到压力积累剖面的巨大变化。造成差异的主要原因与液相是可压缩的这一事实有关,这将再次影响气涌可以膨胀的程度以及它可以给表面带来的压力。将开发一个分析模型,直接显示哪些参数对压力积聚行为有影响。将选择气体密度、流体密度和气体滑移的简单闭合律。该模型将与基于漂移通量公式的两个瞬态模型进行验证。结果表明,压力累积和最终压力水平取决于初始井涌体积、初始流体体积、液体压缩性和流体密度。在比较两种暂态模型时,还将简要讨论数值扩散的影响。本文的目的是增加关于两相流动力学的基本知识,并表明这里所考虑的情况的分析模型可以给出与更复杂的瞬态流动模型所获得的结果相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信